{"title":"Closing the gap in reproductive health for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women: lessons learned from longitudinal perinatal cohort studies.","authors":"Kym Rae, Luciana Fiorella Massi, Salma M Ahmed, Anne-Marie Eades, Rhonda Marriott, Gail Garvey, Sandra Eades, Maree Toombs","doi":"10.1017/S2040174426100567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Longitudinal, Indigenous-led research integrated with community-controlled continuity of care can improve and support perinatal outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families in Australia. Across the past 35 years, seven cohorts have contributed complementary insights from pregnancy through early childhood with varying geographic reach and appropriate Indigenous governance. This paper discusses each of these cohorts and how these studies across pregnancy, birth and some continuing through early childhood, have substantially added to the body of knowledge related to perinatal health needs for women. Early cohorts (e.g., MUSP; Raine) advanced life‑course epidemiology but had low Indigenous representation, limiting perinatal inference for these communities. The Aboriginal Birth Cohort achieved exceptional long‑term retention and partnerships and from the late 2000s, Gomeroi gaaynggal enabled causation analyses using biomarkers. Finally, systems initiatives such as PANDORA and BiOC demonstrate successes with culturally safe pathways and Indigenous‑governed continuity models. Evidence suggests the approaches undertaken in the perinatal period must ensure the voices of Indigenous people are paramount particularly when care and research is being delivered to communities. Lessons learned from these cohorts highlight that Indigenous governance and workforce, co‑design and community‑embedded engagement enhance retention, relevance and translation; registries and continuity models deliver measurable outcome gains. The depth of knowledge identified in life-course research for Indigenous women can significantly add to the standard data collection tools used by state and national services.</p>","PeriodicalId":49167,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease","volume":"17 ","pages":"e23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040174426100567","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Longitudinal, Indigenous-led research integrated with community-controlled continuity of care can improve and support perinatal outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families in Australia. Across the past 35 years, seven cohorts have contributed complementary insights from pregnancy through early childhood with varying geographic reach and appropriate Indigenous governance. This paper discusses each of these cohorts and how these studies across pregnancy, birth and some continuing through early childhood, have substantially added to the body of knowledge related to perinatal health needs for women. Early cohorts (e.g., MUSP; Raine) advanced life‑course epidemiology but had low Indigenous representation, limiting perinatal inference for these communities. The Aboriginal Birth Cohort achieved exceptional long‑term retention and partnerships and from the late 2000s, Gomeroi gaaynggal enabled causation analyses using biomarkers. Finally, systems initiatives such as PANDORA and BiOC demonstrate successes with culturally safe pathways and Indigenous‑governed continuity models. Evidence suggests the approaches undertaken in the perinatal period must ensure the voices of Indigenous people are paramount particularly when care and research is being delivered to communities. Lessons learned from these cohorts highlight that Indigenous governance and workforce, co‑design and community‑embedded engagement enhance retention, relevance and translation; registries and continuity models deliver measurable outcome gains. The depth of knowledge identified in life-course research for Indigenous women can significantly add to the standard data collection tools used by state and national services.
期刊介绍:
JDOHaD publishes leading research in the field of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD). The Journal focuses on the environment during early pre-natal and post-natal animal and human development, interactions between environmental and genetic factors, including environmental toxicants, and their influence on health and disease risk throughout the lifespan. JDOHaD publishes work on developmental programming, fetal and neonatal biology and physiology, early life nutrition, especially during the first 1,000 days of life, human ecology and evolution and Gene-Environment Interactions.
JDOHaD also accepts manuscripts that address the social determinants or education of health and disease risk as they relate to the early life period, as well as the economic and health care costs of a poor start to life. Accordingly, JDOHaD is multi-disciplinary, with contributions from basic scientists working in the fields of physiology, biochemistry and nutrition, endocrinology and metabolism, developmental biology, molecular biology/ epigenetics, human biology/ anthropology, and evolutionary developmental biology. Moreover clinicians, nutritionists, epidemiologists, social scientists, economists, public health specialists and policy makers are very welcome to submit manuscripts.
The journal includes original research articles, short communications and reviews, and has regular themed issues, with guest editors; it is also a platform for conference/workshop reports, and for opinion, comment and interaction.