Sanem Can Sarıoğlu, Buşra Mazooğlu, Furkan Ali Filiz, Ercan Karababa, Mehmet Aslan
{"title":"Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Healthy Individuals: Normative Values for Bone Conduction at Different Frequencies.","authors":"Sanem Can Sarıoğlu, Buşra Mazooğlu, Furkan Ali Filiz, Ercan Karababa, Mehmet Aslan","doi":"10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objectives of this study were to establish normative values for the vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) test in adults and to evaluate test-retest reliability using bone-conducted stimuli at different frequencies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The present study comprised 35 individuals aged 18-40 years. Cervical VEMP and ocular VEMP tests were administered using tone-burst stimuli delivered at 60 dB nHL at frequencies of 250, 500, and 750 Hz with a Radioear B-71 bone vibrator. The initial evaluation was conducted by one clinician, and a subsequent evaluation was performed by a different clinician after a 1-week interval. Wave latencies, interlatencies, amplitudes, and amplitude asymmetry values were analyzed using a test-retest approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cervical VEMP assessments using bone-conducted stimuli, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranged from .23 to .78 at 250 Hz, from .40 to .75 at 500 Hz, and from .29 to .79 at 750 Hz. In ocular VEMP assessments using bone-conducted stimuli, ICC values across evaluation parameters ranged from .13 to .81 at 250 Hz, from .22 to .67 at 500 Hz, and from .24 to .81 at 750 Hz.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cervical and ocular VEMP tests employing bone-conducted stimuli are considered reliable methods for evaluating the functional integrity of the vestibular system.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"973-982"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The objectives of this study were to establish normative values for the vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) test in adults and to evaluate test-retest reliability using bone-conducted stimuli at different frequencies.
Method: The present study comprised 35 individuals aged 18-40 years. Cervical VEMP and ocular VEMP tests were administered using tone-burst stimuli delivered at 60 dB nHL at frequencies of 250, 500, and 750 Hz with a Radioear B-71 bone vibrator. The initial evaluation was conducted by one clinician, and a subsequent evaluation was performed by a different clinician after a 1-week interval. Wave latencies, interlatencies, amplitudes, and amplitude asymmetry values were analyzed using a test-retest approach.
Results: In cervical VEMP assessments using bone-conducted stimuli, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranged from .23 to .78 at 250 Hz, from .40 to .75 at 500 Hz, and from .29 to .79 at 750 Hz. In ocular VEMP assessments using bone-conducted stimuli, ICC values across evaluation parameters ranged from .13 to .81 at 250 Hz, from .22 to .67 at 500 Hz, and from .24 to .81 at 750 Hz.
Conclusion: Cervical and ocular VEMP tests employing bone-conducted stimuli are considered reliable methods for evaluating the functional integrity of the vestibular system.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.