Preferences for hospital in the home for COVID-19: a discrete choice experiment study.

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Mohammad Ehsanikia, Vajihe Ramezani-Doroh, Deborah Street, Leili Tapak, Yadolah Hamidi
{"title":"Preferences for hospital in the home for COVID-19: a discrete choice experiment study.","authors":"Mohammad Ehsanikia, Vajihe Ramezani-Doroh, Deborah Street, Leili Tapak, Yadolah Hamidi","doi":"10.1186/s13561-026-00798-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess Tehran residents' preferences for COVID-19 hospital in the home, using a discrete choice experiment (DCE), to support evidence-based policy-making for future health crises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine hundred twenty-nine Tehran residents aged ≥ 18 years using a multistage sampling approach were surveyed. Data was collected via a structured questionnaire. Attributes (price, physician specialty, emergency contact availability, and caregiver's qualification) and levels were identified through literature review, and consultation with the experts. Data were analyzed by latent class conditional logit model, with class membership examined via a logit model. Marginal willingness-to-pay (MWTP) were calculated, and analyses were performed in Stata version 14 with 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 929 participants (mean age = 36.8, SD = 10.8; 52.7% male) were included. Two latent classes were identified. In Class 1, participants were more price-sensitive (CE = - 0.02, p < 0.001), with a strong preference for emergency contact availability (CE = 5.69, p < 0.001) and combined physician teams (CE = 3.89, p < 0.001). In Class 2, price sensitivity was weaker (CE = - 0.002, p < 0.001), with lower but significant WTP values (111.95 USD for combined physician teams; 56.59 USD for emergency contact). Logistic regression showed that older age (p < 0.01), higher education (OR = 0.32, p < 0.001), very good health status (OR = 0.46, p = 0.001), COVID-19 hospitalization history (OR = 0.47, p < 0.001), and having social security/ health/ other basic insurance (p < 0.05) reduced the likelihood of class 2 membership, whereas larger family size (OR = 1.23, p = 0.003) and low income (p < 0.01) increased it; being married had a borderline significant positive association (OR = 1.52, p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While both groups were price-averse, decisions were mainly driven by emergency support, clinical quality (physician specialty and caregiver's qualification). These findings underscore the need for patient-centered hospital in the home care models that integrate affordability with responsive and high-quality services.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13483721/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-026-00798-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess Tehran residents' preferences for COVID-19 hospital in the home, using a discrete choice experiment (DCE), to support evidence-based policy-making for future health crises.

Methods: Nine hundred twenty-nine Tehran residents aged ≥ 18 years using a multistage sampling approach were surveyed. Data was collected via a structured questionnaire. Attributes (price, physician specialty, emergency contact availability, and caregiver's qualification) and levels were identified through literature review, and consultation with the experts. Data were analyzed by latent class conditional logit model, with class membership examined via a logit model. Marginal willingness-to-pay (MWTP) were calculated, and analyses were performed in Stata version 14 with 95% confidence interval.

Results: A total of 929 participants (mean age = 36.8, SD = 10.8; 52.7% male) were included. Two latent classes were identified. In Class 1, participants were more price-sensitive (CE = - 0.02, p < 0.001), with a strong preference for emergency contact availability (CE = 5.69, p < 0.001) and combined physician teams (CE = 3.89, p < 0.001). In Class 2, price sensitivity was weaker (CE = - 0.002, p < 0.001), with lower but significant WTP values (111.95 USD for combined physician teams; 56.59 USD for emergency contact). Logistic regression showed that older age (p < 0.01), higher education (OR = 0.32, p < 0.001), very good health status (OR = 0.46, p = 0.001), COVID-19 hospitalization history (OR = 0.47, p < 0.001), and having social security/ health/ other basic insurance (p < 0.05) reduced the likelihood of class 2 membership, whereas larger family size (OR = 1.23, p = 0.003) and low income (p < 0.01) increased it; being married had a borderline significant positive association (OR = 1.52, p = 0.05).

Conclusion: While both groups were price-averse, decisions were mainly driven by emergency support, clinical quality (physician specialty and caregiver's qualification). These findings underscore the need for patient-centered hospital in the home care models that integrate affordability with responsive and high-quality services.

COVID-19对家庭医院的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究
目的:本研究旨在通过离散选择实验(DCE)评估德黑兰居民对家中新冠肺炎医院的偏好,为未来健康危机的循证决策提供支持。方法:采用多阶段抽样方法对929名年龄≥18岁的德黑兰居民进行调查。数据通过结构化问卷收集。通过文献回顾和咨询专家,确定了属性(价格、医生专业、急诊联系人可用性和护理人员资格)和水平。数据分析采用潜在类别条件logit模型,通过logit模型检验类别隶属度。计算边际支付意愿(MWTP),并在Stata version 14中进行分析,置信区间为95%。结果:共纳入929例受试者,平均年龄36.8岁,SD = 10.8,男性52.7%。确定了两个潜在类别。在第一类中,参与者对价格更敏感(CE = - 0.02, p)。结论:虽然两组都厌恶价格,但决策主要是由急救支持、临床质量(医生专业和护理人员资格)驱动的。这些发现强调了在家庭护理模式中需要以患者为中心的医院,将可负担性与响应性和高质量的服务结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书