Benchmarking Foundation Potentials against Quantum Chemistry Methods for Predicting Molecular Redox Potentials

IF 7.7
Precision Chemistry Pub Date : 2026-05-25 Epub Date: 2026-01-23 DOI:10.1021/prechem.5c00258
Yicheng Chen, Lixue Cheng, Yan Jing, Peichen Zhong
{"title":"Benchmarking Foundation Potentials against Quantum Chemistry Methods for Predicting Molecular Redox Potentials","authors":"Yicheng Chen,&nbsp;Lixue Cheng,&nbsp;Yan Jing,&nbsp;Peichen Zhong","doi":"10.1021/prechem.5c00258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Computational high-throughput virtual\r\nscreening is essential for\r\nidentifying redox-active molecules for sustainable applications, such\r\nas electrochemical carbon capture. A primary challenge in this approach\r\nis the high computational cost associated with accurate quantum chemistry\r\ncalculations. Machine learning foundation potentials (FPs) trained\r\non extensive density functional theory (DFT) calculations offer a\r\ncomputationally efficient alternative. Here, we benchmark the MACE-OMol-0\r\nand UMA FPs against a hierarchy of DFT functionals for predicting\r\nexperimental molecular redox potentials for both electron transfer\r\n(ET) and proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions. We find\r\nthat these FPs achieve exceptional accuracy for PCET processes, rivaling\r\ntheir target DFT method. However, the performance is diminished for\r\nET reactions, particularly for multielectron transfers involving reactive\r\nions that are underrepresented in the OMol25 training data, revealing\r\na key out-of-distribution limitation. To overcome this, we propose\r\nan optimal hybrid workflow that uses the FPs for efficient geometry\r\noptimization and thermochemical analysis, followed by a crucial single-point\r\nDFT energy refinement and an implicit solvation correction. This pragmatic\r\napproach provides a robust and scalable strategy for accelerating\r\nhigh-throughput virtual screening in sustainable chemistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":29793,"journal":{"name":"Precision Chemistry","volume":"4 5","pages":"612–621"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/prechem.5c00258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational high-throughput virtual screening is essential for identifying redox-active molecules for sustainable applications, such as electrochemical carbon capture. A primary challenge in this approach is the high computational cost associated with accurate quantum chemistry calculations. Machine learning foundation potentials (FPs) trained on extensive density functional theory (DFT) calculations offer a computationally efficient alternative. Here, we benchmark the MACE-OMol-0 and UMA FPs against a hierarchy of DFT functionals for predicting experimental molecular redox potentials for both electron transfer (ET) and proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions. We find that these FPs achieve exceptional accuracy for PCET processes, rivaling their target DFT method. However, the performance is diminished for ET reactions, particularly for multielectron transfers involving reactive ions that are underrepresented in the OMol25 training data, revealing a key out-of-distribution limitation. To overcome this, we propose an optimal hybrid workflow that uses the FPs for efficient geometry optimization and thermochemical analysis, followed by a crucial single-point DFT energy refinement and an implicit solvation correction. This pragmatic approach provides a robust and scalable strategy for accelerating high-throughput virtual screening in sustainable chemistry.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基础电位与量子化学方法预测分子氧化还原电位的对比。
计算高通量虚拟筛选对于识别氧化还原活性分子的可持续应用至关重要,例如电化学碳捕获。这种方法的主要挑战是与精确量子化学计算相关的高计算成本。在广泛密度泛函理论(DFT)计算上训练的机器学习基础电位(FPs)提供了一种计算效率高的替代方案。在这里,我们将MACE-OMol-0和UMA FPs与DFT泛函数进行对比,以预测电子转移(ET)和质子耦合电子转移(PCET)反应的实验分子氧化还原电位。我们发现这些FPs在PCET过程中达到了卓越的精度,与它们的目标DFT方法相媲美。然而,对于ET反应,特别是涉及反应性离子的多电子转移(在OMol25训练数据中代表性不足),性能有所下降,这揭示了一个关键的分布外限制。为了克服这个问题,我们提出了一个最优的混合工作流程,使用FPs进行有效的几何优化和热化学分析,然后进行关键的单点DFT能量细化和隐式溶剂化校正。这种实用的方法为加速可持续化学中的高通量虚拟筛选提供了一种强大且可扩展的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Precision Chemistry
Precision Chemistry 精密化学技术-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Chemical research focused on precision enables more controllable predictable and accurate outcomes which in turn drive innovation in measurement science sustainable materials information materials personalized medicines energy environmental science and countless other fields requiring chemical insights.Precision Chemistry provides a unique and highly focused publishing venue for fundamental applied and interdisciplinary research aiming to achieve precision calculation design synthesis manipulation measurement and manufacturing. It is committed to bringing together researchers from across the chemical sciences and the related scientific areas to showcase original research and critical reviews of exceptional quality significance and interest to the broad chemistry and scientific community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书