Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas, Pedro J Cornejo-Daza, Luis Rodiles-Guerrero, Miguel Sánchez-Moreno, Luis M Alegre, Julián Alcázar, Fernando Pareja-Blanco
{"title":"Mechanical, Neuromuscular, and Hypertrophic Adaptations Through Different Velocity Loss Thresholds With Moderate Loads in Full Squat.","authors":"Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas, Pedro J Cornejo-Daza, Luis Rodiles-Guerrero, Miguel Sánchez-Moreno, Luis M Alegre, Julián Alcázar, Fernando Pareja-Blanco","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of 4 different velocity loss (VL) thresholds (0, 10, 20 and 40%) on hypertrophic, mechanical, and neuromuscular adaptations during a full-squat (SQ) training program, using loads ranging from 55 to 70% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Fifty-one moderately resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to 4 training groups, which differed in the VL threshold achieved within the set (VL0, VL10, VL20, and VL40). Subjects completed 16 SQ sessions (2 per week). Pre- and post-intervention assessments included the following: (a) cross-sectional area (CSA) of the vastus lateralis muscle, (b) countermovement jump, (c) maximal isometric SQ contraction, (d) incremental loading SQ test, and (e) fatigue SQ test. All groups significantly increased muscle CSA ( p < 0.01, group × time interaction p = 0.18; effect size: VL0: 0.19; VL10: 0.22; VL20: 0.19; VL40: 0.47). Significant group × time interactions were observed for 1RM ( p = 0.03) and the velocity attained against heavy loads ( p = 0.02), with VL20 obtaining the greatest gains. Effect sizes in the different strength variables were as follows: VL0: 0.50-1.70; VL10: 0.53-2.34; VL20: 0.81-2.72; VL40: 0.52-0.86. Moderate-load resistance training with moderate VL thresholds elicits the greatest strength gains, whereas higher VL thresholds were associated with greater increases in muscle CSA, despite no significant group × time interaction, and yielded comparatively lower strength improvements, highlighting the need to consider VL when applying velocity-based resistance training.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"1177-1186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: This study aimed to compare the effects of 4 different velocity loss (VL) thresholds (0, 10, 20 and 40%) on hypertrophic, mechanical, and neuromuscular adaptations during a full-squat (SQ) training program, using loads ranging from 55 to 70% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Fifty-one moderately resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to 4 training groups, which differed in the VL threshold achieved within the set (VL0, VL10, VL20, and VL40). Subjects completed 16 SQ sessions (2 per week). Pre- and post-intervention assessments included the following: (a) cross-sectional area (CSA) of the vastus lateralis muscle, (b) countermovement jump, (c) maximal isometric SQ contraction, (d) incremental loading SQ test, and (e) fatigue SQ test. All groups significantly increased muscle CSA ( p < 0.01, group × time interaction p = 0.18; effect size: VL0: 0.19; VL10: 0.22; VL20: 0.19; VL40: 0.47). Significant group × time interactions were observed for 1RM ( p = 0.03) and the velocity attained against heavy loads ( p = 0.02), with VL20 obtaining the greatest gains. Effect sizes in the different strength variables were as follows: VL0: 0.50-1.70; VL10: 0.53-2.34; VL20: 0.81-2.72; VL40: 0.52-0.86. Moderate-load resistance training with moderate VL thresholds elicits the greatest strength gains, whereas higher VL thresholds were associated with greater increases in muscle CSA, despite no significant group × time interaction, and yielded comparatively lower strength improvements, highlighting the need to consider VL when applying velocity-based resistance training.
期刊介绍:
The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.