Mechanical, Neuromuscular, and Hypertrophic Adaptations Through Different Velocity Loss Thresholds With Moderate Loads in Full Squat.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas, Pedro J Cornejo-Daza, Luis Rodiles-Guerrero, Miguel Sánchez-Moreno, Luis M Alegre, Julián Alcázar, Fernando Pareja-Blanco
{"title":"Mechanical, Neuromuscular, and Hypertrophic Adaptations Through Different Velocity Loss Thresholds With Moderate Loads in Full Squat.","authors":"Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas, Pedro J Cornejo-Daza, Luis Rodiles-Guerrero, Miguel Sánchez-Moreno, Luis M Alegre, Julián Alcázar, Fernando Pareja-Blanco","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of 4 different velocity loss (VL) thresholds (0, 10, 20 and 40%) on hypertrophic, mechanical, and neuromuscular adaptations during a full-squat (SQ) training program, using loads ranging from 55 to 70% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Fifty-one moderately resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to 4 training groups, which differed in the VL threshold achieved within the set (VL0, VL10, VL20, and VL40). Subjects completed 16 SQ sessions (2 per week). Pre- and post-intervention assessments included the following: (a) cross-sectional area (CSA) of the vastus lateralis muscle, (b) countermovement jump, (c) maximal isometric SQ contraction, (d) incremental loading SQ test, and (e) fatigue SQ test. All groups significantly increased muscle CSA ( p < 0.01, group × time interaction p = 0.18; effect size: VL0: 0.19; VL10: 0.22; VL20: 0.19; VL40: 0.47). Significant group × time interactions were observed for 1RM ( p = 0.03) and the velocity attained against heavy loads ( p = 0.02), with VL20 obtaining the greatest gains. Effect sizes in the different strength variables were as follows: VL0: 0.50-1.70; VL10: 0.53-2.34; VL20: 0.81-2.72; VL40: 0.52-0.86. Moderate-load resistance training with moderate VL thresholds elicits the greatest strength gains, whereas higher VL thresholds were associated with greater increases in muscle CSA, despite no significant group × time interaction, and yielded comparatively lower strength improvements, highlighting the need to consider VL when applying velocity-based resistance training.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"1177-1186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to compare the effects of 4 different velocity loss (VL) thresholds (0, 10, 20 and 40%) on hypertrophic, mechanical, and neuromuscular adaptations during a full-squat (SQ) training program, using loads ranging from 55 to 70% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Fifty-one moderately resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to 4 training groups, which differed in the VL threshold achieved within the set (VL0, VL10, VL20, and VL40). Subjects completed 16 SQ sessions (2 per week). Pre- and post-intervention assessments included the following: (a) cross-sectional area (CSA) of the vastus lateralis muscle, (b) countermovement jump, (c) maximal isometric SQ contraction, (d) incremental loading SQ test, and (e) fatigue SQ test. All groups significantly increased muscle CSA ( p < 0.01, group × time interaction p = 0.18; effect size: VL0: 0.19; VL10: 0.22; VL20: 0.19; VL40: 0.47). Significant group × time interactions were observed for 1RM ( p = 0.03) and the velocity attained against heavy loads ( p = 0.02), with VL20 obtaining the greatest gains. Effect sizes in the different strength variables were as follows: VL0: 0.50-1.70; VL10: 0.53-2.34; VL20: 0.81-2.72; VL40: 0.52-0.86. Moderate-load resistance training with moderate VL thresholds elicits the greatest strength gains, whereas higher VL thresholds were associated with greater increases in muscle CSA, despite no significant group × time interaction, and yielded comparatively lower strength improvements, highlighting the need to consider VL when applying velocity-based resistance training.

机械、神经肌肉和肥厚的适应性,通过不同的速度损失阈值和中等负荷的全深蹲。
摘要:Sánchez-Valdepeñas, J, Cornejo-Daza, PJ, Rodiles-Guerrero, L, Sánchez-Moreno, M, Alegre, LM, Alcázar, J,和Pareja-Blanco, F.通过不同速度损失阈值的机械、神经肌肉和肥厚适应性。本研究旨在比较4种不同的速度损失(VL)阈值(0,10,20和40%)在全深蹲(SQ)训练计划中对肥厚、机械和神经肌肉适应的影响,使用的负荷范围为1次重复最大值(1RM)的55 - 70%。51名适度阻力训练的男性被随机分配到4个训练组,各组所达到的VL阈值(VL0、VL10、VL20和VL40)不同。受试者完成16次SQ会话(每周2次)。干预前和干预后的评估包括:(a)股外侧肌横截面积(CSA), (b)反向跳跃,(c)最大等距SQ收缩,(d)增量负荷SQ测试,(e)疲劳SQ测试。各组肌肉CSA均显著升高(p < 0.01,组×时间交互作用p = 0.18,效应量VL0: 0.19, VL10: 0.22, VL20: 0.19, VL40: 0.47)。对于1RM (p = 0.03)和重载时获得的速度(p = 0.02),观察到显著的组×时间相互作用,VL20获得最大增益。不同强度变量的效应量为:VL0: 0.50-1.70;VL10: 0.53 - -2.34;VL20: 0.81 - -2.72;VL40: 0.52 - -0.86。中等负荷阻力训练与中等VL阈值可以获得最大的力量增益,而较高的VL阈值与肌肉CSA的较大增加相关,尽管没有显著的组间交互作用,并且产生相对较低的力量改善,强调在应用基于速度的阻力训练时需要考虑VL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书