Blood Pressure Trajectories and Cardiovascular Risk in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Dual-Cohort Analysis.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Sleep Research Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-31 DOI:10.1111/jsr.70366
Jianhong Liao, Yunhan Shi, Bowen Zhang, Mengshuang Lv, Yanru Li, Demin Han
{"title":"Blood Pressure Trajectories and Cardiovascular Risk in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Dual-Cohort Analysis.","authors":"Jianhong Liao, Yunhan Shi, Bowen Zhang, Mengshuang Lv, Yanru Li, Demin Han","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study primarily examined longitudinal systolic blood pressure trajectories in untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and their association with cardiovascular risk. A complementary analysis in the independent trial evaluated longitudinal blood pressure change after CPAP treatment. Data were obtained from the observational Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) and the interventional Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES). Participants with OSA who were not receiving antihypertensive treatment were included. Group-based trajectory modelling was used to identify SBP patterns over time, cardiovascular risk was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses, and CPAP-related SBP changes were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models. During a 10-year follow-up of 624 untreated patients with OSA, three SBP trajectories were identified: stable (87.0%), falling (5.9%), and rising (7.1%). Compared with the stable trajectory, the rising SBP group had a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.13-3.78; p < 0.001). CPAP therapy was associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular events (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.84; p = 0.002). Supplementary adherence analyses suggested more sustained SBP reduction with higher nightly CPAP use, and restricted cubic spline analysis indicated a steeper decline above 5.59 h/night. These findings suggest that rising SBP trajectories identify patients with OSA at highest cardiovascular risk, while CPAP use was associated with lower cardiovascular event risk in the observational SHHS comparison and modest SBP reduction in the complementary APPLES analysis. Trial Registration: SHHS (NCT00005275) and APPLES (NCT00051363).</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70366"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study primarily examined longitudinal systolic blood pressure trajectories in untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and their association with cardiovascular risk. A complementary analysis in the independent trial evaluated longitudinal blood pressure change after CPAP treatment. Data were obtained from the observational Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) and the interventional Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES). Participants with OSA who were not receiving antihypertensive treatment were included. Group-based trajectory modelling was used to identify SBP patterns over time, cardiovascular risk was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses, and CPAP-related SBP changes were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models. During a 10-year follow-up of 624 untreated patients with OSA, three SBP trajectories were identified: stable (87.0%), falling (5.9%), and rising (7.1%). Compared with the stable trajectory, the rising SBP group had a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.13-3.78; p < 0.001). CPAP therapy was associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular events (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.84; p = 0.002). Supplementary adherence analyses suggested more sustained SBP reduction with higher nightly CPAP use, and restricted cubic spline analysis indicated a steeper decline above 5.59 h/night. These findings suggest that rising SBP trajectories identify patients with OSA at highest cardiovascular risk, while CPAP use was associated with lower cardiovascular event risk in the observational SHHS comparison and modest SBP reduction in the complementary APPLES analysis. Trial Registration: SHHS (NCT00005275) and APPLES (NCT00051363).

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的血压轨迹和心血管风险:双队列分析。
本研究主要检查了未经治疗的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的纵向收缩压轨迹及其与心血管风险的关系。独立试验中的补充分析评估了CPAP治疗后的纵向血压变化。数据来自观察性睡眠心脏健康研究(SHHS)和介入性呼吸暂停正压长期疗效研究(apple)。未接受抗高血压治疗的OSA患者被纳入研究。使用基于组的轨迹模型来确定随时间变化的收缩压模式,使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险分析评估心血管风险,使用线性混合效应模型评估cpap相关的收缩压变化。在对624名未经治疗的OSA患者的10年随访中,确定了三种收缩压轨迹:稳定(87.0%),下降(5.9%)和上升(7.1%)。与稳定的轨迹相比,收缩压升高组的心血管事件风险明显更高(调整风险比[HR] 2.84, 95%可信区间[CI] 2.13-3.78
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书