{"title":"Quantitative Synthetic MRI in Body Imaging: Technical Basis, Current Applications, and Future Directions.","authors":"Javkhlan Maikhuu, Akifumi Hagiwara, Katsuhiro Sano, Shohei Fujita, Andica Christina, Junko Kikuta, Hideo Kawasaki, Koji Kamagata","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative synthetic MRI (SyMRI) enables simultaneous acquisition of quantitative T1, T2, and proton density maps and retrospective generation of multiple contrast-weighted images from a single acquisition. By moving beyond conventional qualitative MRI, SyMRI may improve workflow efficiency while providing objective tissue biomarkers. Although most extensively studied in neuroimaging, its application to body MRI has expanded rapidly. This narrative review summarizes the technical basis of body SyMRI, focusing on the predominant 2-dimensional QRAPMASTER/multidynamic multiecho (MDME) framework and the newer 3-dimensional quantification using an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition sequence with T2 preparation pulse (QALAS) approach, and discusses current evidence across breast, prostate, gynecologic, rectal, head and neck, and musculoskeletal imaging. Available studies indicate that SyMRI is technically feasible across these applications and shows promise for lesion characterization, tumor grading, prognostic assessment, treatment-response evaluation, and quantitative analysis of normal and diseased tissues. In several settings, SyMRI-derived parameters provide additional value when combined with diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, clinicopathologic variables, histogram analysis, radiomics, and predictive modeling. However, current evidence remains limited by small, single-center, and methodologically heterogeneous studies, and most body applications still rely on two-dimensional implementations. Future progress will depend on multicenter prospective validation, standardization of quantitative workflows, and broader evaluation of newer three-dimensional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001297","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Quantitative synthetic MRI (SyMRI) enables simultaneous acquisition of quantitative T1, T2, and proton density maps and retrospective generation of multiple contrast-weighted images from a single acquisition. By moving beyond conventional qualitative MRI, SyMRI may improve workflow efficiency while providing objective tissue biomarkers. Although most extensively studied in neuroimaging, its application to body MRI has expanded rapidly. This narrative review summarizes the technical basis of body SyMRI, focusing on the predominant 2-dimensional QRAPMASTER/multidynamic multiecho (MDME) framework and the newer 3-dimensional quantification using an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition sequence with T2 preparation pulse (QALAS) approach, and discusses current evidence across breast, prostate, gynecologic, rectal, head and neck, and musculoskeletal imaging. Available studies indicate that SyMRI is technically feasible across these applications and shows promise for lesion characterization, tumor grading, prognostic assessment, treatment-response evaluation, and quantitative analysis of normal and diseased tissues. In several settings, SyMRI-derived parameters provide additional value when combined with diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, clinicopathologic variables, histogram analysis, radiomics, and predictive modeling. However, current evidence remains limited by small, single-center, and methodologically heterogeneous studies, and most body applications still rely on two-dimensional implementations. Future progress will depend on multicenter prospective validation, standardization of quantitative workflows, and broader evaluation of newer three-dimensional methods.
期刊介绍:
Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.