{"title":"LCN2 and TIMP1 as senescence-associated biomarkers in sepsis-induced AKI and their relationship with immune infiltration.","authors":"Aijing Huo, Xue Yang","doi":"10.1080/17520363.2026.2671010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune cells are key drivers of acute kidney injury (AKI) due to the complex interaction between immune cells, senescence and AKI.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Three AKI-related datasets were sourced from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, encompassing experimental data and gene expression arrays. TIMP1 and LCN2 were used to construct the AKI diagnostic model, and the resulting nomogram and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves exhibited significant diagnostic efficacy. Within the framework of AKI patients, the increased protein expression of LCN2 and TIMP1 was corroborated through Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The precision of the risk predictive model's classification based on signature ARGs, was validated by ROC curves, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9596 in the training cohort; the optimized LCN2/TIMP1 dual-gene diagnostic model showed an AUC of 0.997 in the training set. Utilizing the CIBERSORT algorithm, it was observed that sepsis-induced AKI models exhibited elevated levels of Macrophages M1, T cells follicular helper and so on, and sepsis-induced AKI models had lower levels of dendritic cells resting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The management of AKI emphasizes the senescence-association of LCN2 and TIMP1 genes with immune cells. As a pilot study with a small sample size, more prospective approaches could be considered to demonstrate this argument.</p>","PeriodicalId":9182,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"339-354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13240945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17520363.2026.2671010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Immune cells are key drivers of acute kidney injury (AKI) due to the complex interaction between immune cells, senescence and AKI.
Material and methods: Three AKI-related datasets were sourced from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, encompassing experimental data and gene expression arrays. TIMP1 and LCN2 were used to construct the AKI diagnostic model, and the resulting nomogram and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves exhibited significant diagnostic efficacy. Within the framework of AKI patients, the increased protein expression of LCN2 and TIMP1 was corroborated through Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA).
Results: The precision of the risk predictive model's classification based on signature ARGs, was validated by ROC curves, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9596 in the training cohort; the optimized LCN2/TIMP1 dual-gene diagnostic model showed an AUC of 0.997 in the training set. Utilizing the CIBERSORT algorithm, it was observed that sepsis-induced AKI models exhibited elevated levels of Macrophages M1, T cells follicular helper and so on, and sepsis-induced AKI models had lower levels of dendritic cells resting.
Conclusions: The management of AKI emphasizes the senescence-association of LCN2 and TIMP1 genes with immune cells. As a pilot study with a small sample size, more prospective approaches could be considered to demonstrate this argument.
期刊介绍:
Biomarkers are physical, functional or biochemical indicators of physiological or disease processes. These key indicators can provide vital information in determining disease prognosis, in predicting of response to therapies, adverse events and drug interactions, and in establishing baseline risk. The explosion of interest in biomarker research is driving the development of new predictive, diagnostic and prognostic products in modern medical practice, and biomarkers are also playing an increasingly important role in the discovery and development of new drugs. For the full utility of biomarkers to be realized, we require greater understanding of disease mechanisms, and the interplay between disease mechanisms, therapeutic interventions and the proposed biomarkers. However, in attempting to evaluate the pros and cons of biomarkers systematically, we are moving into new, challenging territory.
Biomarkers in Medicine (ISSN 1752-0363) is a peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal delivering commentary and analysis on the advances in our understanding of biomarkers and their potential and actual applications in medicine. The journal facilitates translation of our research knowledge into the clinic to increase the effectiveness of medical practice.
As the scientific rationale and regulatory acceptance for biomarkers in medicine and in drug development become more fully established, Biomarkers in Medicine provides the platform for all players in this increasingly vital area to communicate and debate all issues relating to the potential utility and applications.
Each issue includes a diversity of content to provide rounded coverage for the research professional. Articles include Guest Editorials, Interviews, Reviews, Research Articles, Perspectives, Priority Paper Evaluations, Special Reports, Case Reports, Conference Reports and Company Profiles. Review coverage is divided into themed sections according to area of therapeutic utility with some issues including themed sections on an area of topical interest.
Biomarkers in Medicine provides a platform for commentary and debate for all professionals with an interest in the identification of biomarkers, elucidation of their role and formalization and approval of their application in modern medicine. The audience for Biomarkers in Medicine includes academic and industrial researchers, clinicians, pathologists, clinical chemists and regulatory professionals.