Beyond emissions: a stochastic cusp-logit analysis of environmental cost regimes in BRICS

IF 7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Carbon Balance and Management Pub Date : 2026-05-31 Epub Date: 2026-08-17 DOI:10.1186/s13021-026-00458-w
Dhyani Mehta, Nikunj Patel, Abdikafi Hassan Abdi
{"title":"Beyond emissions: a stochastic cusp-logit analysis of environmental cost regimes in BRICS","authors":"Dhyani Mehta,&nbsp;Nikunj Patel,&nbsp;Abdikafi Hassan Abdi","doi":"10.1186/s13021-026-00458-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Emerging economies suffer a huge economic burdens from environmental damage because most of the time we measure environmental damage using conventional emissions-based metrics. This study addresses this gap by introducing environmental cost (EC) as a novel measure that quantifies the economic burden of environmental degradation. The need for the new measurement stems from the requirement to examine the non-linear and asymmetric behaviors of the relationship between the environment and the economy in rapidly developing economies such as the BRICS countries in their transition from fossil fuels, their drive for new types of innovation, and their increased susceptibility to sudden changes in the cost of degradation due to energy transition, innovation-related pressures, and vulnerability to sudden changes. Therefore, stabilizing mechanisms such as Energy Transition, Innovation, Environmental Adaptability, and Trade in Low-carbon Technologies (TLCT) will reduce the possibility of experiencing high levels of Environmental Cost, while Environmental Vulnerability (EV) will heighten the probability of experiencing catastrophic regime shifts to high-cost, unstable states with sudden and extreme changes in costs. To accomplish this objective of validating the Cusp-Logit framework, a balanced panel data consisting of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India and South Africa) for the years 2015 to 2024 is used. The hybrid model of the Cusp-Logit framework consists of the geometrical layout of the Cusp Catastrophe model and a stochastic Logit transition mechanism that will capture the nonlinear regimes of the Cusp Catastrophe model and the dynamic persistence of costs associated with environmental degradation. Although empirical evidence points to the stabilizing effects of energy transition, innovation, environmental adaptability and TLCT on flattening the potential surface and reducing the possible occurrence &amp; duration of high-cost regimes; EV creates a systemic tilt which increases the likelihood of a shift to an unstable/high-EC state. The cross-national analysis demonstrates that while China &amp; India have stable innovation-based environments; Brazil, Russia &amp; South Africa are much more susceptible to instability due to a limited ability to adapt to &amp; utilize technology. Given that there is currently no comprehensive framework for understanding environmental performance in terms of costs; this work develops a new methodology for modeling the dynamic behaviors of asymmetrical regimes as well as understanding the transition probabilities between them. This provides an early warning system, which will assist BRICS policymakers to manage their exposure to environmental risks while moving towards developing sustainable pathways with low cost. Unlike conventional emission-based and linear approaches, the proposed framework captures nonlinear regime shifts, transition probabilities, and persistence of environmental cost dynamics, offering a scalable tool for policy design under uncertainty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13021-026-00458-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-026-00458-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emerging economies suffer a huge economic burdens from environmental damage because most of the time we measure environmental damage using conventional emissions-based metrics. This study addresses this gap by introducing environmental cost (EC) as a novel measure that quantifies the economic burden of environmental degradation. The need for the new measurement stems from the requirement to examine the non-linear and asymmetric behaviors of the relationship between the environment and the economy in rapidly developing economies such as the BRICS countries in their transition from fossil fuels, their drive for new types of innovation, and their increased susceptibility to sudden changes in the cost of degradation due to energy transition, innovation-related pressures, and vulnerability to sudden changes. Therefore, stabilizing mechanisms such as Energy Transition, Innovation, Environmental Adaptability, and Trade in Low-carbon Technologies (TLCT) will reduce the possibility of experiencing high levels of Environmental Cost, while Environmental Vulnerability (EV) will heighten the probability of experiencing catastrophic regime shifts to high-cost, unstable states with sudden and extreme changes in costs. To accomplish this objective of validating the Cusp-Logit framework, a balanced panel data consisting of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India and South Africa) for the years 2015 to 2024 is used. The hybrid model of the Cusp-Logit framework consists of the geometrical layout of the Cusp Catastrophe model and a stochastic Logit transition mechanism that will capture the nonlinear regimes of the Cusp Catastrophe model and the dynamic persistence of costs associated with environmental degradation. Although empirical evidence points to the stabilizing effects of energy transition, innovation, environmental adaptability and TLCT on flattening the potential surface and reducing the possible occurrence & duration of high-cost regimes; EV creates a systemic tilt which increases the likelihood of a shift to an unstable/high-EC state. The cross-national analysis demonstrates that while China & India have stable innovation-based environments; Brazil, Russia & South Africa are much more susceptible to instability due to a limited ability to adapt to & utilize technology. Given that there is currently no comprehensive framework for understanding environmental performance in terms of costs; this work develops a new methodology for modeling the dynamic behaviors of asymmetrical regimes as well as understanding the transition probabilities between them. This provides an early warning system, which will assist BRICS policymakers to manage their exposure to environmental risks while moving towards developing sustainable pathways with low cost. Unlike conventional emission-based and linear approaches, the proposed framework captures nonlinear regime shifts, transition probabilities, and persistence of environmental cost dynamics, offering a scalable tool for policy design under uncertainty.

超越排放:金砖国家环境成本制度的随机尖点逻辑分析。
新兴经济体因环境破坏而承受着巨大的经济负担,因为大多数时候我们用传统的基于排放的指标来衡量环境破坏。本研究通过引入环境成本(EC)作为一种量化环境退化经济负担的新措施来解决这一差距。对新测量方法的需求源于对金砖国家等快速发展经济体的环境与经济关系的非线性和不对称行为的研究,这些经济体正在从化石燃料转型,推动新型创新,以及它们对能源转型、创新相关压力和突变导致的退化成本突然变化的日益敏感。因此,能源转型、创新、环境适应性和低碳技术交易(TLCT)等稳定机制将降低经历高水平环境成本的可能性,而环境脆弱性(EV)将增加经历灾难性政权转移到高成本、不稳定状态的可能性,并伴随着成本的突然和极端变化。为了实现验证Cusp-Logit框架的目标,使用了2015年至2024年由金砖国家(巴西、俄罗斯、印度和南非)组成的平衡面板数据。Cusp-Logit框架的混合模型由Cusp Catastrophe模型的几何布局和随机Logit转换机制组成,该机制将捕捉Cusp Catastrophe模型的非线性机制和与环境退化相关的成本的动态持久性。虽然经验证据表明,能源转型、创新、环境适应性和TLCT对平坦化潜在面、减少高成本制度可能发生和持续时间具有稳定作用;电导率产生系统性倾斜,增加了向不稳定/高电导率状态转变的可能性。跨国分析表明,中国和印度拥有稳定的创新环境;由于适应和利用技术的能力有限,巴西、俄罗斯和南非更容易受到不稳定的影响。鉴于目前没有从成本角度了解环境表现的全面框架;这项工作开发了一种新的方法来模拟不对称体制的动态行为以及理解它们之间的转移概率。这将提供一个早期预警系统,帮助金砖国家决策者管理环境风险,同时朝着低成本可持续发展的道路迈进。与传统的基于排放的线性方法不同,所提出的框架捕获了非线性制度转移、过渡概率和环境成本动态的持久性,为不确定性下的政策设计提供了可扩展的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Carbon Balance and Management
Carbon Balance and Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle. The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community. This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system. Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书