{"title":"Chilling and Blurring Negative Memories: An Experimental Memory Training Study.","authors":"Fatemeh Azar, Tara Rezapour, Hossein Karsazi, Javad Hatami","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2025.5539.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The present study examined the extent to which broadening attentional scope (BAS) during acquisition and working memory interference (WMI) during reconsolidation could influence the memory formation process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 95 participants were randomly assigned to inactive control (n=30), BAS (n=33), and WMI (n=32) groups. While watching a traumatic film, the participants in the BAS group were instructed to allocate their attention to the peripheral details of the film. In contrast, participants in the WMI group performed certain spatial working memory tasks. Memory vividness and emotionality were assessed before and after the intervention using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Valence, arousal, and dominance were measured by the self-assessment manikin (SAM) immediately after watching the film. Moreover, all participants were asked to record their intrusive memories for 3 days after the experiment. Statistical software package SPSS, version 24.0 was used for group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results suggested that interfering with visuospatial working memory during the retrieval of emotionally valenced memories could significantly reduce the level of vividness of mental images from pre- to post-assessments (P=0.004). However, in terms of emotionality, arousal, dominance, and the number of intrusive memories, we found no significant differences between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants in the WMI group outperformed those in the control group in blurring the negatively valenced memory at the post-assessment. In contrast to our primary assumption, BAS did not result in any significant changes compared to the other two groups. Future studies with larger sample sizes and objective measurements may provide additional evidence on the efficacy of these methods, particularly in the context of clinical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8701,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"16 5","pages":"879-890"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13220683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2025.5539.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The present study examined the extent to which broadening attentional scope (BAS) during acquisition and working memory interference (WMI) during reconsolidation could influence the memory formation process.
Methods: A total of 95 participants were randomly assigned to inactive control (n=30), BAS (n=33), and WMI (n=32) groups. While watching a traumatic film, the participants in the BAS group were instructed to allocate their attention to the peripheral details of the film. In contrast, participants in the WMI group performed certain spatial working memory tasks. Memory vividness and emotionality were assessed before and after the intervention using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Valence, arousal, and dominance were measured by the self-assessment manikin (SAM) immediately after watching the film. Moreover, all participants were asked to record their intrusive memories for 3 days after the experiment. Statistical software package SPSS, version 24.0 was used for group comparisons.
Results: Our results suggested that interfering with visuospatial working memory during the retrieval of emotionally valenced memories could significantly reduce the level of vividness of mental images from pre- to post-assessments (P=0.004). However, in terms of emotionality, arousal, dominance, and the number of intrusive memories, we found no significant differences between the three groups.
Conclusion: Participants in the WMI group outperformed those in the control group in blurring the negatively valenced memory at the post-assessment. In contrast to our primary assumption, BAS did not result in any significant changes compared to the other two groups. Future studies with larger sample sizes and objective measurements may provide additional evidence on the efficacy of these methods, particularly in the context of clinical implications.
期刊介绍:
BCN is an international multidisciplinary journal that publishes editorials, original full-length research articles, short communications, reviews, methodological papers, commentaries, perspectives and “news and reports” in the broad fields of developmental, molecular, cellular, system, computational, behavioral, cognitive, and clinical neuroscience. No area in the neural related sciences is excluded from consideration, although priority is given to studies that provide applied insights into the functioning of the nervous system. BCN aims to advance our understanding of organization and function of the nervous system in health and disease, thereby improving the diagnosis and treatment of neural-related disorders. Manuscripts submitted to BCN should describe novel results generated by experiments that were guided by clearly defined aims or hypotheses. BCN aims to provide serious ties in interdisciplinary communication, accessibility to a broad readership inside Iran and the region and also in all other international academic sites, effective peer review process, and independence from all possible non-scientific interests. BCN also tries to empower national, regional and international collaborative networks in the field of neuroscience in Iran, Middle East, Central Asia and North Africa and to be the voice of the Iranian and regional neuroscience community in the world of neuroscientists. In this way, the journal encourages submission of editorials, review papers, commentaries, methodological notes and perspectives that address this scope.