Empirical Analyses Using Secondary Supply Chain Data

IF 10.1 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Journal of Operations Management Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1002/joom.70037
Yan Dong, Fan Zou, Sining Song, Yuqi Peng, Kefeng Xu
{"title":"Empirical Analyses Using Secondary Supply Chain Data","authors":"Yan Dong,&nbsp;Fan Zou,&nbsp;Sining Song,&nbsp;Yuqi Peng,&nbsp;Kefeng Xu","doi":"10.1002/joom.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The increasing availability of secondary data on supply chain relationships has created new opportunities for empirical research in supply chain management. Datasets from sources including Bloomberg SPLC, FactSet, and CompuStat may support empirical analyses of decision-making, strategic behaviors, governance mechanisms, and dynamics of inter-organizational relationships of supply chains. However, the complexity and interconnectedness of supply chains and the inconsistent quality and coverage of supply chain data sources present empirical challenges, which have limited the scope and depth of current empirical research on supply chains. To address these challenges, this study investigates and compares the three commonly used supply chain databases and introduces a data-focused roadmap for supply chain research using secondary data sources. This roadmap presents a process featuring data source selection, unit-of-analysis decisions, and appropriate econometric treatments, for example, endogeneity, selection bias, and correlated errors in supply chains, which contributes to the supply chain management literature by improving consistency, generalizability, and reliability in empirical supply chain research.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"72 4","pages":"627-650"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.70037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing availability of secondary data on supply chain relationships has created new opportunities for empirical research in supply chain management. Datasets from sources including Bloomberg SPLC, FactSet, and CompuStat may support empirical analyses of decision-making, strategic behaviors, governance mechanisms, and dynamics of inter-organizational relationships of supply chains. However, the complexity and interconnectedness of supply chains and the inconsistent quality and coverage of supply chain data sources present empirical challenges, which have limited the scope and depth of current empirical research on supply chains. To address these challenges, this study investigates and compares the three commonly used supply chain databases and introduces a data-focused roadmap for supply chain research using secondary data sources. This roadmap presents a process featuring data source selection, unit-of-analysis decisions, and appropriate econometric treatments, for example, endogeneity, selection bias, and correlated errors in supply chains, which contributes to the supply chain management literature by improving consistency, generalizability, and reliability in empirical supply chain research.

基于二级供应链数据的实证分析
越来越多的关于供应链关系的二手数据的可用性为供应链管理的实证研究创造了新的机会。来自彭博SPLC、FactSet和CompuStat等来源的数据集可以支持决策、战略行为、治理机制和供应链组织间关系动态的实证分析。然而,供应链的复杂性和互联性以及供应链数据源的质量和覆盖范围不一致带来了实证挑战,这限制了当前供应链实证研究的范围和深度。为了应对这些挑战,本研究调查并比较了三种常用的供应链数据库,并介绍了使用辅助数据源进行供应链研究的以数据为中心的路线图。该路线图展示了一个以数据源选择、分析单元决策和适当的计量经济学处理为特征的过程,例如供应链中的内生性、选择偏差和相关误差,通过提高供应链实证研究的一致性、概括性和可靠性,为供应链管理文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Operations Management
Journal of Operations Management 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
62
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Operations Management (JOM) is a leading academic publication dedicated to advancing the field of operations management (OM) through rigorous and original research. The journal's primary audience is the academic community, although it also values contributions that attract the interest of practitioners. However, it does not publish articles that are primarily aimed at practitioners, as academic relevance is a fundamental requirement. JOM focuses on the management aspects of various types of operations, including manufacturing, service, and supply chain operations. The journal's scope is broad, covering both profit-oriented and non-profit organizations. The core criterion for publication is that the research question must be centered around operations management, rather than merely using operations as a context. For instance, a study on charismatic leadership in a manufacturing setting would only be within JOM's scope if it directly relates to the management of operations; the mere setting of the study is not enough. Published papers in JOM are expected to address real-world operational questions and challenges. While not all research must be driven by practical concerns, there must be a credible link to practice that is considered from the outset of the research, not as an afterthought. Authors are cautioned against assuming that academic knowledge can be easily translated into practical applications without proper justification. JOM's articles are abstracted and indexed by several prestigious databases and services, including Engineering Information, Inc.; Executive Sciences Institute; INSPEC; International Abstracts in Operations Research; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; SciSearch/Science Citation Index; CompuMath Citation Index; Current Contents/Engineering, Computing & Technology; Information Access Company; and Social Sciences Citation Index. This ensures that the journal's research is widely accessible and recognized within the academic and professional communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书