Effects of Replacing Alfalfa Hay With Barley Silage in High-Concentrate Diets: Chewing Behavior, Ruminal Fermentation, Total-Tract Digestibility, and Milk Production of Dairy Cows in Mid-Lactation Phase

Animal Research and One Health Pub Date : 2026-05-27 Epub Date: 2025-05-30 DOI:10.1002/aro2.70013
M. R. Naji-Zavareh, F. Hashemzadeh, M. Alikhani, M. Khorvash, A. Kahyani, F. Ahmadi
{"title":"Effects of Replacing Alfalfa Hay With Barley Silage in High-Concentrate Diets: Chewing Behavior, Ruminal Fermentation, Total-Tract Digestibility, and Milk Production of Dairy Cows in Mid-Lactation Phase","authors":"M. R. Naji-Zavareh,&nbsp;F. Hashemzadeh,&nbsp;M. Alikhani,&nbsp;M. Khorvash,&nbsp;A. Kahyani,&nbsp;F. Ahmadi","doi":"10.1002/aro2.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Limited land or water resources, climate variability, and price fluctuations challenge the consistent availability of alfalfa forage. Barley forage, with high energy and low agronomic costs, shows promise as an alternative in dairy diets. Our objective was to examine the effects of replacing alfalfa hay with whole-plant barley silage on behavioral patterns, ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility, and lactation productivity. A 3 × 3 Latin square design was employed, involving 12 multiparous Holstein cows (days in milk = 122 ± 6; milk production = 49.3 ± 2.0 kg; mean ± standard deviation). Alfalfa hay was partially or completely substituted with barley silage as (1) a control diet without barley silage (BS0; 23.2% corn silage + 15.6% alfalfa hay), (2) 23.2% corn silage + 7.8% alfalfa hay + 7.9% barley silage (BS50), and (3) 23.2% corn silage + 15.7% barley silage + 0% alfalfa hay (BS100). Dry matter intake was the greatest in BS50-fed cows (27.3 kg/day) and lowest with BS100-fed cows (24.4 kg/day). Time spent eating, ruminating, and chewing was not different across treatments. BS50-fed cows had the highest propionate concentration and the lowest acetate and valerate concentrations. Cows fed BS50 and BS100 had lower starch digestibility than BS0. Milk production was not different between diets, but feed efficiency was the greatest with BS100-fed cows, resulting in the highest income over feed cost estimated in this group. Overall, barley silage can replace alfalfa hay in high-concentrate diets fed to mid-lactation cows, as its total replacement improved the efficiency of feed conversion into milk.</p>","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":"4 2","pages":"185-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Research and One Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aro2.70013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited land or water resources, climate variability, and price fluctuations challenge the consistent availability of alfalfa forage. Barley forage, with high energy and low agronomic costs, shows promise as an alternative in dairy diets. Our objective was to examine the effects of replacing alfalfa hay with whole-plant barley silage on behavioral patterns, ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility, and lactation productivity. A 3 × 3 Latin square design was employed, involving 12 multiparous Holstein cows (days in milk = 122 ± 6; milk production = 49.3 ± 2.0 kg; mean ± standard deviation). Alfalfa hay was partially or completely substituted with barley silage as (1) a control diet without barley silage (BS0; 23.2% corn silage + 15.6% alfalfa hay), (2) 23.2% corn silage + 7.8% alfalfa hay + 7.9% barley silage (BS50), and (3) 23.2% corn silage + 15.7% barley silage + 0% alfalfa hay (BS100). Dry matter intake was the greatest in BS50-fed cows (27.3 kg/day) and lowest with BS100-fed cows (24.4 kg/day). Time spent eating, ruminating, and chewing was not different across treatments. BS50-fed cows had the highest propionate concentration and the lowest acetate and valerate concentrations. Cows fed BS50 and BS100 had lower starch digestibility than BS0. Milk production was not different between diets, but feed efficiency was the greatest with BS100-fed cows, resulting in the highest income over feed cost estimated in this group. Overall, barley silage can replace alfalfa hay in high-concentrate diets fed to mid-lactation cows, as its total replacement improved the efficiency of feed conversion into milk.

Abstract Image

高精料饲粮中大麦青贮替代苜蓿干草对泌乳中期奶牛咀嚼行为、瘤胃发酵、全道消化率和产奶量的影响
有限的土地或水资源,气候变化和价格波动挑战苜蓿饲料的持续可用性。大麦饲料具有高能量和低农艺成本,有望成为乳制品日粮的替代品。我们的目的是研究用全株大麦青贮替代苜蓿干草对行为模式、瘤胃发酵、营养物质消化率和泌乳率的影响。采用3 × 3拉丁方设计,纳入12头多产荷斯坦奶牛(产奶日= 122±6,产奶量= 49.3±2.0 kg,均值±标准差)。用大麦青贮部分或全部替代苜蓿干草作为(1)无大麦青贮(BS0; 23.2%玉米青贮+ 15.6%苜蓿干草)、(2)23.2%玉米青贮+ 7.8%苜蓿干草+ 7.9%大麦青贮(BS50)和(3)23.2%玉米青贮+ 15.7%大麦青贮+ 0%苜蓿干草(BS100)的对照饲粮。干物质采食量bs50最大(27.3 kg/d), bs100最低(24.4 kg/d)。在不同的治疗中,花在吃饭、反刍和咀嚼上的时间没有什么不同。饲喂bs50的奶牛丙酸盐浓度最高,乙酸盐和戊酸盐浓度最低。饲喂BS50和BS100的奶牛淀粉消化率低于饲喂BS0的奶牛。不同饲粮的产奶量没有差异,但bs100饲的饲料效率最高,因此该组奶牛的收入比饲料成本最高。综上所述,大麦青贮可替代高精料饲粮中的苜蓿干草,提高了泌乳中期奶牛的料成乳效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书