Using Camera Traps to Study Wild Ungulate Ecology and Behavior in a Tropical Semi-Arid System

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Kamakshi S. Tanwar, Sourabh Pundir, Ayan Sadhu, Yadvendradev V. Jhala, Qamar Qureshi
{"title":"Using Camera Traps to Study Wild Ungulate Ecology and Behavior in a Tropical Semi-Arid System","authors":"Kamakshi S. Tanwar,&nbsp;Sourabh Pundir,&nbsp;Ayan Sadhu,&nbsp;Yadvendradev V. Jhala,&nbsp;Qamar Qureshi","doi":"10.1111/1440-1703.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Camera traps are under-utilized for studying ungulate demography and behavior. Reliable demographic and behavioral information on ungulates is critical for management as they are major drivers of ecosystems and form bulk of the large carnivore diets. We deployed camera traps in woodland and open forest habitats of Ranthambhore National Park during summer (<i>n</i> = 33) and winter (<i>n</i> = 31) to assess effects of season and habitat on body condition, age–sex structure, group size, activity patterns and budgets of chital and sambar. Adult chital body condition was significantly higher in winter (3.86 ± 0.01) than summer (2.66 ± 0.04), as was sambar (winter: 3.89 ± 0.01; summer: 3.67 ± 0.09). Adult sex ratios were consistently female-biased for chital (winter: 1.29 ± 0.004; summer: 1.84 ± 0.006) and sambar (winter: 1.6 ± 0.07; summer: 2.2 ± 0.25). Fawn: female ratios were lower in winter (chital: 9.36 ± 0.9, sambar: 4.65 ± 0.3) than summer (chital: 17.06 ± 2.5, sambar: 8 ± 2.1), reflecting the influence of their respective reproductive cycles. Mean group size was higher in winter (chital: 2.63 ± 0.11; sambar: 1.76 ± 0.05) than summer (chital: 2.39 ± 0.14; sambar: 1.62 ± 0.11), but differences were not significant. Both species exhibited bimodal crepuscular activity, shifting with sunrise, sunset, and insolation. Chital spent more time walking (54.6%) in summer, followed by foraging (29.5%); while in winter, foraging (43.7%) was more compared to walking (32.7%). For sambar, walking (50.4%) was more than foraging (39.2%) in summer; however, in winter foraging was increased to 43.5%, and walking decreased to 29.9%. This study highlights camera traps as a non-invasive tool to monitor ungulate populations, linking seasonal behavior, and habitat conditions, providing early warning signals of stress, and overall performance relevant for management.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11434,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Research","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1703.70084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Camera traps are under-utilized for studying ungulate demography and behavior. Reliable demographic and behavioral information on ungulates is critical for management as they are major drivers of ecosystems and form bulk of the large carnivore diets. We deployed camera traps in woodland and open forest habitats of Ranthambhore National Park during summer (n = 33) and winter (n = 31) to assess effects of season and habitat on body condition, age–sex structure, group size, activity patterns and budgets of chital and sambar. Adult chital body condition was significantly higher in winter (3.86 ± 0.01) than summer (2.66 ± 0.04), as was sambar (winter: 3.89 ± 0.01; summer: 3.67 ± 0.09). Adult sex ratios were consistently female-biased for chital (winter: 1.29 ± 0.004; summer: 1.84 ± 0.006) and sambar (winter: 1.6 ± 0.07; summer: 2.2 ± 0.25). Fawn: female ratios were lower in winter (chital: 9.36 ± 0.9, sambar: 4.65 ± 0.3) than summer (chital: 17.06 ± 2.5, sambar: 8 ± 2.1), reflecting the influence of their respective reproductive cycles. Mean group size was higher in winter (chital: 2.63 ± 0.11; sambar: 1.76 ± 0.05) than summer (chital: 2.39 ± 0.14; sambar: 1.62 ± 0.11), but differences were not significant. Both species exhibited bimodal crepuscular activity, shifting with sunrise, sunset, and insolation. Chital spent more time walking (54.6%) in summer, followed by foraging (29.5%); while in winter, foraging (43.7%) was more compared to walking (32.7%). For sambar, walking (50.4%) was more than foraging (39.2%) in summer; however, in winter foraging was increased to 43.5%, and walking decreased to 29.9%. This study highlights camera traps as a non-invasive tool to monitor ungulate populations, linking seasonal behavior, and habitat conditions, providing early warning signals of stress, and overall performance relevant for management.

Abstract Image

利用相机陷阱研究热带半干旱系统中野生有蹄类动物的生态学和行为
相机陷阱在研究有蹄类动物的人口和行为方面没有得到充分利用。可靠的有蹄类动物的人口统计和行为信息对管理至关重要,因为它们是生态系统的主要驱动力,也是大型食肉动物饮食的主要组成部分。本研究分别于夏季(n = 33)和冬季(n = 31)在Ranthambhore国家公园的林地和开阔森林生境设置了相机陷阱,以评估季节和生境对红腹和桑巴的身体状况、年龄-性别结构、群体规模、活动模式和预算的影响。成人头体状况冬季(3.86±0.01)显著高于夏季(2.66±0.04),桑巴(冬季:3.89±0.01)显著高于夏季(3.67±0.09)。成人性别比始终偏向于女性(冬季:1.29±0.004;夏季:1.84±0.006)和桑巴(冬季:1.6±0.07;夏季:2.2±0.25)。冬季雌小鹿比(头重:9.36±0.9,参重:4.65±0.3)低于夏季(头重:17.06±2.5,参重:8±2.1),反映了它们各自生殖周期的影响。平均组大小冬季(头数:2.63±0.11;桑巴:1.76±0.05)高于夏季(头数:2.39±0.14;桑巴:1.62±0.11),但差异不显著。这两个物种都表现出双峰的黄昏活动,随日出、日落和日晒而变化。夏季,Chital花在散步上的时间最多(54.6%),其次是觅食(29.5%);冬季以觅食为主(43.7%),步行为主(32.7%)。夏季以步行为主(50.4%),采食为主(39.2%);冬季觅食增加至43.5%,步行减少至29.9%。本研究强调了相机陷阱作为监测有蹄类种群的非侵入性工具,将季节性行为和栖息地条件联系起来,提供压力的早期预警信号,以及与管理相关的总体表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Research
Ecological Research 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Research has been published in English by the Ecological Society of Japan since 1986. Ecological Research publishes original papers on all aspects of ecology, in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书