Comparative Analysis of Different On-Board CCS Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Solutions for IMO Compliance

IF 3.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology Pub Date : 2026-04-23 Epub Date: 2025-12-26 DOI:10.1002/ghg.70011
Riccardo Risso, Dario Bove, Barbara Bosio
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Different On-Board CCS Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Solutions for IMO Compliance","authors":"Riccardo Risso,&nbsp;Dario Bove,&nbsp;Barbara Bosio","doi":"10.1002/ghg.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study analysed the use of a CCS system on board ships to reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, in line with the new maritime regulations issued by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO). To achieve the desired removal rates, two innovative plant configurations were investigated: the first approach uses a traditional reforming reactor (thermally heated steam methane reformer [tSMR]) heated with burners, whereas the second employs an electrified reforming reactor (electrically heated steam methane reformer [eSMR]). The two solutions were compared considering fuel consumption, system footprint, simplicity of implementation, the ratio between liquefied CO<sub>2</sub> and removed CO<sub>2</sub>, and thermal integration, which are crucial parameters for integrating a CCS system on board ships. Simulation results showed that the eSMR system offers significant advantages in terms of footprint, design simplicity and thermal integration. However, the tSMR system exhibits greater efficiency in liquefied CO<sub>2</sub> storage and fuel consumption reduction for engines running on HFO with a specific fuel oil consumption (SFOC) of approximately 180 g/kWh. Additionally, it has a smaller footprint at low CO<sub>2</sub> removal rates. Consequently, the optimal solution depends on several factors, including the type of vessel (short- or long-range routes), engine characteristics and specific fuel consumption, the type of fuel used and the CO<sub>2</sub> reduction target. In conclusion, both solutions demonstrate superior performance compared to traditional systems described in the literature.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"16 2","pages":"284-293"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analysed the use of a CCS system on board ships to reduce CO2 emissions, in line with the new maritime regulations issued by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO). To achieve the desired removal rates, two innovative plant configurations were investigated: the first approach uses a traditional reforming reactor (thermally heated steam methane reformer [tSMR]) heated with burners, whereas the second employs an electrified reforming reactor (electrically heated steam methane reformer [eSMR]). The two solutions were compared considering fuel consumption, system footprint, simplicity of implementation, the ratio between liquefied CO2 and removed CO2, and thermal integration, which are crucial parameters for integrating a CCS system on board ships. Simulation results showed that the eSMR system offers significant advantages in terms of footprint, design simplicity and thermal integration. However, the tSMR system exhibits greater efficiency in liquefied CO2 storage and fuel consumption reduction for engines running on HFO with a specific fuel oil consumption (SFOC) of approximately 180 g/kWh. Additionally, it has a smaller footprint at low CO2 removal rates. Consequently, the optimal solution depends on several factors, including the type of vessel (short- or long-range routes), engine characteristics and specific fuel consumption, the type of fuel used and the CO2 reduction target. In conclusion, both solutions demonstrate superior performance compared to traditional systems described in the literature.

不同船用CCS熔融碳酸盐燃料电池方案对IMO符合性的比较分析
根据国际海事组织(IMO)发布的新海事法规,本研究分析了在船上使用CCS系统以减少二氧化碳排放的情况。为了达到预期的去除率,研究人员研究了两种创新装置:第一种方法使用燃烧器加热的传统重整反应器(热加热蒸汽甲烷重整器[tSMR]),而第二种方法使用电气化重整反应器(电加热蒸汽甲烷重整器[eSMR])。对两种解决方案进行了比较,考虑了燃料消耗、系统占地面积、实施的简单性、液化二氧化碳与去除二氧化碳的比例以及热集成,这些都是将CCS系统集成到船上的关键参数。仿真结果表明,eSMR系统在占地面积、设计简单和热集成方面具有显著优势。然而,tSMR系统在液化二氧化碳储存方面表现出更高的效率,并且在燃油消耗量(SFOC)约为180克/千瓦时的HFO发动机上,tSMR系统可以降低燃料消耗。此外,它在低二氧化碳去除率下占地面积更小。因此,最佳解决方案取决于几个因素,包括船舶类型(短程或远程航线)、发动机特性和特定燃料消耗、使用的燃料类型和二氧化碳减排目标。总之,与文献中描述的传统系统相比,这两种解决方案都表现出优越的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology ENERGY & FUELS-ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is a new online-only scientific journal dedicated to the management of greenhouse gases. The journal will focus on methods for carbon capture and storage (CCS), as well as utilization of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a feedstock for fuels and chemicals. GHG will also provide insight into strategies to mitigate emissions of other greenhouse gases. Significant advances will be explored in critical reviews, commentary articles and short communications of broad interest. In addition, the journal will offer analyses of relevant economic and political issues, industry developments and case studies. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is an exciting new online-only journal published as a co-operative venture of the SCI (Society of Chemical Industry) and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书