A Comprehensive Alignment Framework for Building Coherence in an Assessment System

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Brooke Nash, Meagan Karvonen, Claudia Flowers, Amy Clark, Russell Swinburne Romine, Sue Bechard
{"title":"A Comprehensive Alignment Framework for Building Coherence in an Assessment System","authors":"Brooke Nash,&nbsp;Meagan Karvonen,&nbsp;Claudia Flowers,&nbsp;Amy Clark,&nbsp;Russell Swinburne Romine,&nbsp;Sue Bechard","doi":"10.1111/emip.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditional alignment studies that are narrowly focused on content standards and assessment items and are conducted postadministration often lack the timeliness and utility needed to improve assessment systems. This paper introduces a flexible alignment framework centered on assessment-system coherence. Our framework broadens alignment evaluation to include all interconnected elements, from domain definition to score use. We advocate for proactive alignment evaluation by defining expectations in advance and gathering both procedural and empirical evidence throughout the assessment life cycle. By addressing three guiding questions regarding system elements that need to be aligned, the purpose of the alignment evidence, and the types of evidence to use, developers can create customized evaluation plans to enhance alignment during development. The paper provides example alignment questions and an example application of the framework. We discuss the framework's potential to enhance the coherence of assessment systems in the service of meaningful policy and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emip.70027","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.70027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional alignment studies that are narrowly focused on content standards and assessment items and are conducted postadministration often lack the timeliness and utility needed to improve assessment systems. This paper introduces a flexible alignment framework centered on assessment-system coherence. Our framework broadens alignment evaluation to include all interconnected elements, from domain definition to score use. We advocate for proactive alignment evaluation by defining expectations in advance and gathering both procedural and empirical evidence throughout the assessment life cycle. By addressing three guiding questions regarding system elements that need to be aligned, the purpose of the alignment evidence, and the types of evidence to use, developers can create customized evaluation plans to enhance alignment during development. The paper provides example alignment questions and an example application of the framework. We discuss the framework's potential to enhance the coherence of assessment systems in the service of meaningful policy and practice.

Abstract Image

建立评估系统一致性的综合协调框架
传统的一致性研究狭隘地集中于内容标准和评估项目,并在行政管理后进行,往往缺乏改进评估系统所需的及时性和实用性。本文介绍了一种以评估系统一致性为中心的柔性校准框架。我们的框架扩展了校准评估,以包括所有相互关联的元素,从领域定义到评分使用。我们主张通过预先定义期望并在整个评估生命周期中收集程序和经验证据来进行前瞻性校准评估。通过解决关于需要对齐的系统元素、对齐证据的目的和要使用的证据类型的三个指导性问题,开发人员可以创建自定义的评估计划来增强开发期间的对齐。本文提供了示例对齐问题和该框架的示例应用。我们讨论了该框架在为有意义的政策和实践服务中加强评估系统一致性的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书