Nicolas Djeghri, Anthony Sturbois, Pierre Hélaouët, Quentin Geissmann, Peggy Rimmelin-Maury, Aurélien Boyé, Olivier Gauthier, Miquel De Cáceres
{"title":"Going round in cycles but going somewhere: Deciphering cyclical dynamics using Ecological Trajectory Analysis","authors":"Nicolas Djeghri, Anthony Sturbois, Pierre Hélaouët, Quentin Geissmann, Peggy Rimmelin-Maury, Aurélien Boyé, Olivier Gauthier, Miquel De Cáceres","doi":"10.1002/ecm.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Earth's ecological dynamics are largely rhythmic, tied to regular cycles such as seasons, lunar phases, days, or tides. Subdisciplines of ecology such as phenology have developed specific concepts and metrics adapted to describe and analyze cyclical dynamics, but they operate in a largely unidimensional framework. There is therefore a lack of suitable tools for describing cyclical ecological dynamics in multidimensional spaces. Here, we introduce Cyclical Ecological Trajectory Analysis (CETA), an extension of Ecological Trajectory Analysis, allowing for describing and comparing cyclical dynamics in a multidimensional context without dimensionality reduction. CETA provides metrics to quantify cycles' geometry and resemblance in a multidimensional space of interest and offers a multidimensional equivalent of the concept of phenological advance and delays. We provide four ecological examples demonstrating how CETA can be useful to study different cyclical dynamics (seasons, days, tides), using different data (community composition, environmental data) and in different contexts (observational or experimental). We also show how CETA can be articulated with methods of multiscale analysis for time series. We conclude by summarizing the advantages and limitations of the method, its wide range of potential applications, as well as its connections and synergies with other, already available, aspects of the Ecological Trajectory Analysis framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"96 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecm.70058","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.70058","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Earth's ecological dynamics are largely rhythmic, tied to regular cycles such as seasons, lunar phases, days, or tides. Subdisciplines of ecology such as phenology have developed specific concepts and metrics adapted to describe and analyze cyclical dynamics, but they operate in a largely unidimensional framework. There is therefore a lack of suitable tools for describing cyclical ecological dynamics in multidimensional spaces. Here, we introduce Cyclical Ecological Trajectory Analysis (CETA), an extension of Ecological Trajectory Analysis, allowing for describing and comparing cyclical dynamics in a multidimensional context without dimensionality reduction. CETA provides metrics to quantify cycles' geometry and resemblance in a multidimensional space of interest and offers a multidimensional equivalent of the concept of phenological advance and delays. We provide four ecological examples demonstrating how CETA can be useful to study different cyclical dynamics (seasons, days, tides), using different data (community composition, environmental data) and in different contexts (observational or experimental). We also show how CETA can be articulated with methods of multiscale analysis for time series. We conclude by summarizing the advantages and limitations of the method, its wide range of potential applications, as well as its connections and synergies with other, already available, aspects of the Ecological Trajectory Analysis framework.
期刊介绍:
The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology.
Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message.
Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology.
Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions.
In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.