Associations of psychological insulin resistance, diabetes-related stress, and intention to use complementary and alternative diets with self-management among older adults with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study.

Q4 Nursing
Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-29 DOI:10.17079/jkgn.2025.00262
Kyung Min Kim, Hwal Lan Bang
{"title":"Associations of psychological insulin resistance, diabetes-related stress, and intention to use complementary and alternative diets with self-management among older adults with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Kyung Min Kim, Hwal Lan Bang","doi":"10.17079/jkgn.2025.00262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the associations of psychological insulin resistance (PIR), diabetes- related stress, and intention to use complementary and alternative diets (CAD) with self-management in older adults with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 180 adults aged ≥65 with type 2 diabetes at a primary clinic in Korea. Data were collected using structured questionnaires between March and June, 2024. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation, and multiple regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of participants was 73.79±5.59 years. PIR (mean, 57.54±8.81), diabetes-related stress (mean, 41.62±7.65), intention to use CAD (mean, 3.56±1.32), and self-management (mean, 38.11±5.98) were measured. The PIR was positively correlated with self-management (r=.31, p<.001), whereas diabetes-related stress was negatively correlated with self-management (r=-.24, p<.001). PIR (β=.47, p<.001) and diabetes-related stress (β=-.41, p<.001) were significant predictors of self-management (R2=24.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIR positively correlated with self-management and was the most influential factor, suggesting that resistance to insulin treatment may paradoxically motivate individuals to engage in better self-management behaviors. Intention to use CAD was weakly positively correlated with PIR, indicating that individuals with higher insulin resistance may explore alternative dietary options. Diabetes-related stress negatively affects self-management, highlighting the importance of stress management for improving diabetes self-management. These findings highlight the significance of psychological factors in the development of tailored self-management education programs for older adults with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":52377,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing","volume":"28 2","pages":"161-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13226793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17079/jkgn.2025.00262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the associations of psychological insulin resistance (PIR), diabetes- related stress, and intention to use complementary and alternative diets (CAD) with self-management in older adults with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 180 adults aged ≥65 with type 2 diabetes at a primary clinic in Korea. Data were collected using structured questionnaires between March and June, 2024. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation, and multiple regression analysis.

Results: The average age of participants was 73.79±5.59 years. PIR (mean, 57.54±8.81), diabetes-related stress (mean, 41.62±7.65), intention to use CAD (mean, 3.56±1.32), and self-management (mean, 38.11±5.98) were measured. The PIR was positively correlated with self-management (r=.31, p<.001), whereas diabetes-related stress was negatively correlated with self-management (r=-.24, p<.001). PIR (β=.47, p<.001) and diabetes-related stress (β=-.41, p<.001) were significant predictors of self-management (R2=24.6%).

Conclusion: PIR positively correlated with self-management and was the most influential factor, suggesting that resistance to insulin treatment may paradoxically motivate individuals to engage in better self-management behaviors. Intention to use CAD was weakly positively correlated with PIR, indicating that individuals with higher insulin resistance may explore alternative dietary options. Diabetes-related stress negatively affects self-management, highlighting the importance of stress management for improving diabetes self-management. These findings highlight the significance of psychological factors in the development of tailored self-management education programs for older adults with type 2 diabetes.

老年2型糖尿病患者的心理胰岛素抵抗、糖尿病相关压力、补充和替代饮食与自我管理的关联:一项横断面研究
目的:本研究调查了老年2型糖尿病患者的心理胰岛素抵抗(PIR)、糖尿病相关应激以及使用补充和替代饮食(CAD)的意愿与自我管理的关系。方法:在韩国一家初级诊所对180名年龄≥65岁的2型糖尿病患者进行了横断面研究。数据是在2024年3月至6月期间通过结构化问卷收集的。采用SPSS进行描述性统计、独立t检验、单因素方差分析、Pearson相关分析和多元回归分析。结果:参与者平均年龄为73.79±5.59岁。测量了PIR(平均57.54±8.81)、糖尿病相关应激(平均41.62±7.65)、使用CAD的意向(平均3.56±1.32)和自我管理(平均38.11±5.98)。PIR与自我管理呈正相关(r= 0.31, p)结论:PIR与自我管理呈正相关,是最重要的影响因素,提示对胰岛素治疗的抵抗可能矛盾地激励个体从事更好的自我管理行为。使用CAD的意愿与PIR呈弱正相关,表明胰岛素抵抗较高的个体可能会探索其他饮食选择。糖尿病相关压力对自我管理产生负面影响,强调压力管理对改善糖尿病自我管理的重要性。这些发现强调了心理因素在制定针对老年2型糖尿病患者的个性化自我管理教育计划中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书