Queries and quaestiones: Edward Lhwyd between Natural History and Natural Philosophy.

IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Flynn Allott
{"title":"Queries and <i>quaestiones</i>: Edward Lhwyd between Natural History and Natural Philosophy.","authors":"Flynn Allott","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2026.2676567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reads the antiquary and Fellow of the Royal Society Edward Lhwyd's works with attention to the different forms of questioning which he associated with various forms of natural enquiry. It argues that Lhwyd associated two forms of question - the 'Query' and the <i>quaestio</i> - with different styles of information: in Lhwyd's view, 'Queries' asked for precise, observed points of fact; <i>quaestiones</i> were discursive, argumentative prompts for thought not strictly dependent on experiment or observations, and connected with the oldest forms of university education and examination. Building on Richard Yeo's work, the article argues that Lhwyd divided his own preoccupations along these lines: for his lexicographical and local-historical work, he produced a voluminous set of 'Parochial Queries'; by contrast, when he addressed the hotly controverted and apparently insoluble question of the Earth's origin and the deposition of fossils, he referred to the matter persistently as a <i>quaestio</i>. The article further shows the possible influences on Lhwyd in making this latter move: the influence of John Ray's <i>Three Physico-Theological Discourses</i>; Lhwyd's personal animus against Robert Plot; and Lhwyd's more generally unorthodox academic credentials all contributed, I argue, to his use of the much-disputed <i>quaestio</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2026.2676567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reads the antiquary and Fellow of the Royal Society Edward Lhwyd's works with attention to the different forms of questioning which he associated with various forms of natural enquiry. It argues that Lhwyd associated two forms of question - the 'Query' and the quaestio - with different styles of information: in Lhwyd's view, 'Queries' asked for precise, observed points of fact; quaestiones were discursive, argumentative prompts for thought not strictly dependent on experiment or observations, and connected with the oldest forms of university education and examination. Building on Richard Yeo's work, the article argues that Lhwyd divided his own preoccupations along these lines: for his lexicographical and local-historical work, he produced a voluminous set of 'Parochial Queries'; by contrast, when he addressed the hotly controverted and apparently insoluble question of the Earth's origin and the deposition of fossils, he referred to the matter persistently as a quaestio. The article further shows the possible influences on Lhwyd in making this latter move: the influence of John Ray's Three Physico-Theological Discourses; Lhwyd's personal animus against Robert Plot; and Lhwyd's more generally unorthodox academic credentials all contributed, I argue, to his use of the much-disputed quaestio.

问与问:爱德华·路德在自然史与自然哲学之间。
这篇文章读了古物学家和皇家学会会员爱德华·Lhwyd的作品,注意到他与各种形式的自然调查相关联的不同形式的问题。它认为Lhwyd将两种形式的问题——“Query”和“questio”——与不同类型的信息联系起来:在Lhwyd看来,“Queries”要求精确的、观察到的事实点;问题是一种讨论性的、辩论性的思维提示,并不严格依赖于实验或观察,它与最古老的大学教育和考试形式有关。文章以理查德·杨的作品为基础,认为Lhwyd将自己的关注点划分为以下几点:为了他的词典编纂和地方历史工作,他制作了大量的“教区查询”;相比之下,当他谈到地球的起源和化石的沉积这一备受争议、显然无法解决的问题时,他总是把这件事当作一个问题来提。本文进一步分析了路德的这一举动可能受到的影响:约翰·雷的三个物理神学话语的影响;Lhwyd对Robert Plot的个人敌意;我认为,Lhwyd更普遍的非正统学术证书都促成了他使用这个备受争议的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Science
Annals of Science 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Science , launched in 1936, publishes work on the history of science, technology and medicine, covering developments from classical antiquity to the late 20th century. The Journal has a global reach, both in terms of the work that it publishes, and also in terms of its readership. The editors particularly welcome submissions from authors in Asia, Africa and South America. Each issue contains research articles, and a comprehensive book reviews section, including essay reviews on a group of books on a broader level. Articles are published in both English and French, and the Journal welcomes proposals for special issues on relevant topics. The Editors and Publisher are committed to supporting early career researchers, and award an annual prize to the best submission from current doctoral students, or those awarded a doctorate in the past four years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书