Does Continuous Glucose Monitoring Improve Glycemic Control and Quality of Life Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care Settings? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.2
Helen Park-Chong, Michelle Benrimon, Arlene Smaldone
{"title":"Does Continuous Glucose Monitoring Improve Glycemic Control and Quality of Life Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care Settings? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Helen Park-Chong, Michelle Benrimon, Arlene Smaldone","doi":"10.1177/26350106261451194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic control and quality of life (QoL) among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) managed within primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 4 databases were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through July 9, 2025. Eligible trials reported on A1C, QoL, diabetes distress, and device satisfaction. Shorter term (6-8 months) and longer term (12-14 months) A1C outcomes were synthesized using random effects meta-analysis models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 739 records, 4 multisite RCTs (6 reports) met inclusion criteria and represent data from 566 adults with T2DM in primary care settings. Two trials utilized real time CGM, while others employed retrospective or intermittently scanned CGM. Participants attended primary care visits during the trial, receiving diabetes management and medication changes as required. The CGM intervention significantly improved glycemic control with pooled A1C reduction of -0.46% at 6 to 8 months and -0.33% at 12 to 14 months and device satisfaction with no differences in QoL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results demonstrate that CGM significantly improves glycemic control with no change in QoL among adults with T2DM in primary care and suggest that CGM utilization within this setting offers distinct advantages in patient engagement and diabetes management, particularly when integrated through a multidisciplinary team approach. Future research should prioritize populations currently ineligible for CGM coverage, such as non-insulin-using patients and underserved groups, while also investigating the impact of updated sensors' accuracy on clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75187,"journal":{"name":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","volume":" ","pages":"353-365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106261451194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic control and quality of life (QoL) among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) managed within primary care settings.

Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 4 databases were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through July 9, 2025. Eligible trials reported on A1C, QoL, diabetes distress, and device satisfaction. Shorter term (6-8 months) and longer term (12-14 months) A1C outcomes were synthesized using random effects meta-analysis models.

Results: Of 739 records, 4 multisite RCTs (6 reports) met inclusion criteria and represent data from 566 adults with T2DM in primary care settings. Two trials utilized real time CGM, while others employed retrospective or intermittently scanned CGM. Participants attended primary care visits during the trial, receiving diabetes management and medication changes as required. The CGM intervention significantly improved glycemic control with pooled A1C reduction of -0.46% at 6 to 8 months and -0.33% at 12 to 14 months and device satisfaction with no differences in QoL.

Conclusion: These results demonstrate that CGM significantly improves glycemic control with no change in QoL among adults with T2DM in primary care and suggest that CGM utilization within this setting offers distinct advantages in patient engagement and diabetes management, particularly when integrated through a multidisciplinary team approach. Future research should prioritize populations currently ineligible for CGM coverage, such as non-insulin-using patients and underserved groups, while also investigating the impact of updated sensors' accuracy on clinical outcomes.

在初级保健机构中,持续血糖监测是否能改善成人2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制和生活质量?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估连续血糖监测(CGM)对初级保健机构管理的成人2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的血糖控制和生活质量(QoL)的影响。方法:根据PRISMA 2020指南,对4个数据库进行全面检索,检索截至2025年7月9日发表的随机对照试验(rct)。符合条件的试验报告了A1C、生活质量、糖尿病困扰和设备满意度。采用随机效应荟萃分析模型综合短期(6-8个月)和长期(12-14个月)糖化血红蛋白结局。结果:在739条记录中,4项多站点随机对照试验(6份报告)符合纳入标准,代表了566名初级保健机构的成年T2DM患者的数据。两项试验采用实时CGM,而其他试验采用回顾性或间歇扫描CGM。在试验期间,参与者参加了初级保健访问,接受糖尿病管理并根据需要改变药物。CGM干预显著改善了血糖控制,6 - 8个月时糖化血红蛋白降低-0.46%,12 - 14个月时糖化血红蛋白降低-0.33%,设备满意度无差异的生活质量。结论:这些结果表明,在初级保健中,CGM显著改善了T2DM成人患者的血糖控制,而生活质量没有改变,并表明在这种情况下,CGM的使用在患者参与和糖尿病管理方面具有明显的优势,特别是通过多学科团队方法整合时。未来的研究应优先考虑目前不符合CGM覆盖条件的人群,如未使用胰岛素的患者和服务不足的群体,同时还应调查更新传感器的准确性对临床结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书