Merve Öztürk Muhtar, Sabahat Zeynep Yey Özkeskin, Yusuf Bekir Kara, Pelin Corman Dincer, Erol Cansız
{"title":"Impact of Nasal Intubation Tube Design on Nasal Morphology in Orthognathic Surgery: a Comparative Study.","authors":"Merve Öztürk Muhtar, Sabahat Zeynep Yey Özkeskin, Yusuf Bekir Kara, Pelin Corman Dincer, Erol Cansız","doi":"10.1007/s12663-025-02702-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared the effects of two different intubation tube designs used in orthognathic surgery on nasal morphology alterations, utilizing three-dimensional imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-dimensional facial scanning (3DFS) images obtained from 22 patients preoperatively (T0) and at six months postoperatively (T1) were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were categorized into two groups according to the type of the intubation tube used (Group I: Cuffed Reinforced Endotracheal Tube; Group II: North Polar Endotracheal Tube (Portex® North Polar tube)). Following the identification of reference anatomical landmarks, nasal soft tissue measurements were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group I, a significant difference in right nostril axis was found between T0 and T1 (<i>p</i> = 0,038). Intragroup analysis of the right and left Nasal-Alar (N-A) angles revealed significant changes between T0 and T1 measurements. At T1, the right N-A angles in Group I were significantly different from those in Group II (53.00 ± 4.77 vs. 48.72 ± 4.70, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.047). The right-left nostril width difference was statistically greater in Group I compared to Group II at T1 (median values 154; 60, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The design and material of the intubation tube should be considered a contributing factor that may influence the nasal morphology.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":"25 3","pages":"713-721"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13201700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-025-02702-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study compared the effects of two different intubation tube designs used in orthognathic surgery on nasal morphology alterations, utilizing three-dimensional imaging.
Methods: Three-dimensional facial scanning (3DFS) images obtained from 22 patients preoperatively (T0) and at six months postoperatively (T1) were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were categorized into two groups according to the type of the intubation tube used (Group I: Cuffed Reinforced Endotracheal Tube; Group II: North Polar Endotracheal Tube (Portex® North Polar tube)). Following the identification of reference anatomical landmarks, nasal soft tissue measurements were conducted.
Results: In Group I, a significant difference in right nostril axis was found between T0 and T1 (p = 0,038). Intragroup analysis of the right and left Nasal-Alar (N-A) angles revealed significant changes between T0 and T1 measurements. At T1, the right N-A angles in Group I were significantly different from those in Group II (53.00 ± 4.77 vs. 48.72 ± 4.70, respectively; p = 0.047). The right-left nostril width difference was statistically greater in Group I compared to Group II at T1 (median values 154; 60, respectively).
Conclusion: The design and material of the intubation tube should be considered a contributing factor that may influence the nasal morphology.
期刊介绍:
This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.