Peripheral Positions and Reachability of Casual Sexual Partners in Egocentric Networks Among Sexual and Gender Minorities.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sexually transmitted diseases Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-28 DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002365
Guozheng Yang, Ian Dale, Carol Golin, Feng-Chang Lin, Meagan Zarwell, Ann M Dennis
{"title":"Peripheral Positions and Reachability of Casual Sexual Partners in Egocentric Networks Among Sexual and Gender Minorities.","authors":"Guozheng Yang, Ian Dale, Carol Golin, Feng-Chang Lin, Meagan Zarwell, Ann M Dennis","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Casual sexual partners (CSP) involve non-monogamous partnerships, limited personal disclosure, and sexual behaviors that could facilitate HIV transmission. Their peripheral positions in social networks may limit intervention reach but also create unique bridging opportunities for prevention efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Egocentric network data were collected from sexual and gender minority participants (egos) in Charlotte, North Carolina from 2023 to 2025. We compared CSPs' demographic characteristics and structural positions in networks with those of other social contacts (alters), including established sexual partners (ESPs), and non-sexual alters (NSAs). Factors associated with connectivity between NSAs and sexual partners were examined using dyadic and triadic analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Having CSPs was associated with having HIV, larger networks, and more sexual partnerships. Both casual and established sexual partners provided limited social support to egos and occupied peripheral positions with reduced reachability within egocentric networks. NSAs connected to CSPs showed lower racial homophily with their egos compared with those connected to established partners but were more likely to provide physical or health support. NSAs who were: socially closer to egos (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.13, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-62.24); not family members (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.00-0.45); and living within 5 miles (aOR = 6.92, 95% CI, 1.22-55.53) were more likely to know egos' CSPs. In sensitivity analysis that defined longer-standing sexual partners as CSPs, our main findings persisted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future interventions could consider integrating key NSAs into peer-led strategies to enhance HIV/STI prevention, as their connections within egocentric networks may help facilitate engagement with sexual partners.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":"665-672"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002365","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Casual sexual partners (CSP) involve non-monogamous partnerships, limited personal disclosure, and sexual behaviors that could facilitate HIV transmission. Their peripheral positions in social networks may limit intervention reach but also create unique bridging opportunities for prevention efforts.

Methods: Egocentric network data were collected from sexual and gender minority participants (egos) in Charlotte, North Carolina from 2023 to 2025. We compared CSPs' demographic characteristics and structural positions in networks with those of other social contacts (alters), including established sexual partners (ESPs), and non-sexual alters (NSAs). Factors associated with connectivity between NSAs and sexual partners were examined using dyadic and triadic analyses.

Results: Having CSPs was associated with having HIV, larger networks, and more sexual partnerships. Both casual and established sexual partners provided limited social support to egos and occupied peripheral positions with reduced reachability within egocentric networks. NSAs connected to CSPs showed lower racial homophily with their egos compared with those connected to established partners but were more likely to provide physical or health support. NSAs who were: socially closer to egos (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.13, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-62.24); not family members (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.00-0.45); and living within 5 miles (aOR = 6.92, 95% CI, 1.22-55.53) were more likely to know egos' CSPs. In sensitivity analysis that defined longer-standing sexual partners as CSPs, our main findings persisted.

Conclusions: Future interventions could consider integrating key NSAs into peer-led strategies to enhance HIV/STI prevention, as their connections within egocentric networks may help facilitate engagement with sexual partners.

性与性别少数群体自我中心网络中随意性伴侣的外围位置与可达性。
背景:随意性伴侣(CSP)包括非一夫一妻制的伙伴关系,有限的个人信息披露和可能促进艾滋病毒传播的性行为。他们在社会网络中的外围位置可能会限制干预的范围,但也为预防工作创造了独特的桥梁机会。方法:收集2023-2025年北卡罗来纳州夏洛特市性少数和性别少数参与者(ego)的自我中心网络数据。我们比较了csp的人口统计特征和在网络中的结构位置与其他社会联系人(改变者),包括已建立的性伴侣(ESPs)和非性改变者(NSAs)。NSAs和性伴侣之间连通性的相关因素使用二元和三元分析进行了检查。结果:患有csp与感染艾滋病毒、更大的网络和更多的性伙伴关系有关。随意的和固定的性伴侣对自我的社会支持都是有限的,并且在以自我为中心的网络中占据着较低可达性的边缘位置。与那些有固定伴侣的人相比,与csp有联系的国家安全局在自我方面表现出较低的种族同一性,但更有可能提供身体或健康支持。社会上更接近自我的NSAs(调整优势比[aOR]=6.13, 95%可信区间[CI], 1.26-62.24);非家庭成员(aOR=0.02, 95% CI, 0.00-0.45);居住在5英里范围内(aOR=6.92, 95% CI, 1.22-55.53)的人更容易知道自我的csp。在将长期性伴侣定义为csp的敏感性分析中,我们的主要发现仍然存在。结论:未来的干预措施可以考虑将关键的国家安全局纳入以同伴为主导的战略中,以加强艾滋病毒/性传播感染的预防,因为它们在自我中心网络中的联系可能有助于促进与性伴侣的接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually transmitted diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association​, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书