Relationship between gestational diabetes mellitus and anxiety symptoms and gut microbiome composition in pregnant women.

IF 2.3 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Open Life Sciences Pub Date : 2026-05-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1515/biol-2025-1317
Jing Xu, Lina Cai, Sushuang Lu, Lina Chen, Tiantian Zhang, Jing Wang
{"title":"Relationship between gestational diabetes mellitus and anxiety symptoms and gut microbiome composition in pregnant women.","authors":"Jing Xu, Lina Cai, Sushuang Lu, Lina Chen, Tiantian Zhang, Jing Wang","doi":"10.1515/biol-2025-1317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic complication of pregnancy associated with poor outcomes for both mother and baby. An expanding body of research highlights the gut microbiota's influence on host metabolism and neurobehavioral processes, yet how gestational diabetes mellitus, anxiety symptoms, and microbial communities interact is still unclear. To address this gap, we profiled gut-microbiome changes in pregnant women presenting with both GDM and clinically significant anxiety. A total of 120 participants were categorized into four groups: GDM with anxiety (G + A), GDM without anxiety (G + NAF), non-GDM with anxiety (NG + A), and non-GDM without anxiety (NG + NA). Stool specimens were obtained and subjected to 16S rRNA gene profiling of the V3-V4 hypervariable region using Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Results showed significant differences in fasting blood glucose between GDM and non-GDM groups. GDM groups exhibited enrichment of Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of Faecalibacterium, while anxiety groups showed increased Lactococcus and Streptococcus. The dual-exposure group (G + A) demonstrated unique enrichment of oral-derived genera (e.g., Fusobacterium and Actinomyces). Among 963 OTUs identified, 681 were core OTUs shared across groups. GDM and anxiety groups possessed 42 and 32 unique OTUs, respectively, with 26 OTUs specific to the G + A group. LEfSe analysis revealed 16 phylogenetically conserved taxa distinguishing GDM and non-GDM groups, while anxiety-positive groups were characterized by Bacilli and Negativicutes. These findings suggest that GDM and anxiety are associated with distinct gut microbiota profiles, highlighting potential microbial biomarkers for early diagnosis and intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":19605,"journal":{"name":"Open Life Sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":"20251317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13201086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2025-1317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic complication of pregnancy associated with poor outcomes for both mother and baby. An expanding body of research highlights the gut microbiota's influence on host metabolism and neurobehavioral processes, yet how gestational diabetes mellitus, anxiety symptoms, and microbial communities interact is still unclear. To address this gap, we profiled gut-microbiome changes in pregnant women presenting with both GDM and clinically significant anxiety. A total of 120 participants were categorized into four groups: GDM with anxiety (G + A), GDM without anxiety (G + NAF), non-GDM with anxiety (NG + A), and non-GDM without anxiety (NG + NA). Stool specimens were obtained and subjected to 16S rRNA gene profiling of the V3-V4 hypervariable region using Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Results showed significant differences in fasting blood glucose between GDM and non-GDM groups. GDM groups exhibited enrichment of Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of Faecalibacterium, while anxiety groups showed increased Lactococcus and Streptococcus. The dual-exposure group (G + A) demonstrated unique enrichment of oral-derived genera (e.g., Fusobacterium and Actinomyces). Among 963 OTUs identified, 681 were core OTUs shared across groups. GDM and anxiety groups possessed 42 and 32 unique OTUs, respectively, with 26 OTUs specific to the G + A group. LEfSe analysis revealed 16 phylogenetically conserved taxa distinguishing GDM and non-GDM groups, while anxiety-positive groups were characterized by Bacilli and Negativicutes. These findings suggest that GDM and anxiety are associated with distinct gut microbiota profiles, highlighting potential microbial biomarkers for early diagnosis and intervention.

妊娠期糖尿病与孕妇焦虑症状及肠道菌群组成的关系
妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是一种常见的妊娠代谢并发症,与母亲和婴儿的不良结局相关。越来越多的研究强调肠道微生物群对宿主代谢和神经行为过程的影响,但妊娠糖尿病、焦虑症状和微生物群落如何相互作用仍不清楚。为了解决这一差距,我们分析了同时出现GDM和临床显著焦虑的孕妇肠道微生物组的变化。120名参与者被分为四组:GDM伴焦虑(G + A)、GDM无焦虑(G + NAF)、非GDM伴焦虑(NG + A)和非GDM无焦虑(NG + NA)。获取粪便标本,使用Illumina MiSeq测序对V3-V4高变区进行16S rRNA基因分析。结果显示GDM组和非GDM组空腹血糖有显著差异。GDM组肠杆菌科细菌增加,粪杆菌减少,而焦虑组乳球菌和链球菌增加。双暴露组(G + A)显示口腔衍生属(如梭杆菌和放线菌)的独特富集。在963个otu中,681个是跨群体共享的核心otu。GDM组和焦虑组分别有42个和32个独特的otu,其中26个otu是G + A组特有的。LEfSe分析显示,GDM组和非GDM组有16个系统发育保守的类群,而焦虑阳性组以Bacilli和negatiutes为特征。这些发现表明,GDM和焦虑与不同的肠道微生物群相关,突出了早期诊断和干预的潜在微生物生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
131
审稿时长
43 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Life Sciences (previously Central European Journal of Biology) is a fast growing peer-reviewed journal, devoted to scholarly research in all areas of life sciences, such as molecular biology, plant science, biotechnology, cell biology, biochemistry, biophysics, microbiology and virology, ecology, differentiation and development, genetics and many others. Open Life Sciences assures top quality of published data through critical peer review and editorial involvement throughout the whole publication process. Thanks to the Open Access model of publishing, it also offers unrestricted access to published articles for all users.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书