A Clinico-Microbiological Comparison of Antibacterial-Coated and Non-coated Polyglactin 910 Sutures in Extraction Sockets: Prospective, Split-Mouth, Randomized, Triple-Blinded Study.

IF 0.7 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-11 DOI:10.1007/s12663-025-02595-0
Amar Singh, Vandana Shenoy, Janani Ravindranath, Gayathri Gopi, Mohamed Afradh
{"title":"A Clinico-Microbiological Comparison of Antibacterial-Coated and Non-coated Polyglactin 910 Sutures in Extraction Sockets: Prospective, Split-Mouth, Randomized, Triple-Blinded Study.","authors":"Amar Singh, Vandana Shenoy, Janani Ravindranath, Gayathri Gopi, Mohamed Afradh","doi":"10.1007/s12663-025-02595-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite being a ubiquitous procedure in oral surgery, tooth extraction, including impacted third molars, carries the potential for postoperative complications such as suture site infections (SSIs). These SSIs occur with a frequency of approximately 5% and typically fall within the \"clean-contaminated\" surgical category, where triclosan-coated sutures have demonstrated a reduction in incidence. However, the intraoral environment presents a unique microbial landscape, raising the question of whether these benefits translate to the specific context of extraction sockets. Therefore, this investigation aims to conduct a comparative analysis, examining both clinical and microbiological aspects, to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of plain polyglactin 910 sutures and triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 sutures in extraction sockets post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Material methods: </strong>Assessing effectiveness of triclosan sutures in reducing suture site infections, a split-mouth study was conducted with 111 patients undergoing multiple extractions (222 sites). Each patient received triclosan suture on one site and plain suture on the other. Suture handling, infection rates, pain levels, and healing were evaluated on days 3 and 7 post-extraction. Bacteria on the sutures were also identified and quantified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that triclosan-coated sutures significantly improved socket healing, reduced suture site infections (SSIs), and decreased bacterial colonization compared to plain polyglactin 910 sutures on day 3 when compared to day 7. The study suggests that triclosan's antibacterial properties reduce bacterial colonization on sutures, leading to improved clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates triclosan-coated sutures reduced infection and inflammation in dental extractions compared to conventional sutures, likely due to decreased bacterial colonization.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":"25 3","pages":"857-865"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13201749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-025-02595-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite being a ubiquitous procedure in oral surgery, tooth extraction, including impacted third molars, carries the potential for postoperative complications such as suture site infections (SSIs). These SSIs occur with a frequency of approximately 5% and typically fall within the "clean-contaminated" surgical category, where triclosan-coated sutures have demonstrated a reduction in incidence. However, the intraoral environment presents a unique microbial landscape, raising the question of whether these benefits translate to the specific context of extraction sockets. Therefore, this investigation aims to conduct a comparative analysis, examining both clinical and microbiological aspects, to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of plain polyglactin 910 sutures and triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 sutures in extraction sockets post-surgery.

Material methods: Assessing effectiveness of triclosan sutures in reducing suture site infections, a split-mouth study was conducted with 111 patients undergoing multiple extractions (222 sites). Each patient received triclosan suture on one site and plain suture on the other. Suture handling, infection rates, pain levels, and healing were evaluated on days 3 and 7 post-extraction. Bacteria on the sutures were also identified and quantified.

Results: The study found that triclosan-coated sutures significantly improved socket healing, reduced suture site infections (SSIs), and decreased bacterial colonization compared to plain polyglactin 910 sutures on day 3 when compared to day 7. The study suggests that triclosan's antibacterial properties reduce bacterial colonization on sutures, leading to improved clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates triclosan-coated sutures reduced infection and inflammation in dental extractions compared to conventional sutures, likely due to decreased bacterial colonization.

抗菌包被和非包被聚乳酸蛋白910缝线在拔牙槽中的临床微生物学比较:前瞻性、裂口、随机、三盲研究。
简介:尽管在口腔外科中拔牙是一种普遍的手术,但包括阻生第三磨牙在内的拔牙有可能出现术后并发症,如缝合线部位感染(ssi)。这些ssi发生的频率约为5%,通常属于“清洁污染”手术类别,其中三氯生涂层缝合线已证明发生率降低。然而,口腔内环境呈现出独特的微生物景观,这就提出了这些益处是否转化为拔牙槽的特定环境的问题。因此,本研究旨在从临床和微生物学两方面进行对比分析,评价普通聚乳酸910缝线和三氯生包被聚乳酸910缝线在拔牙窝术后的抗菌效果。材料方法:对111例(222个部位)多次拔牙的患者进行口裂研究,评估三氯生缝合线减少缝合部位感染的效果。每例患者均在一侧进行三氯生缝合,另一侧进行平缝。拔牙后第3天和第7天评估缝线处理、感染率、疼痛水平和愈合情况。同时对缝合线上的细菌进行鉴定和定量。结果:研究发现,与第7天相比,与普通聚乳酸蛋白910缝线相比,三氯生包被缝线在第3天显著改善了窝愈合,减少了缝合部位感染(ssi),减少了细菌定植。该研究表明,三氯生的抗菌特性减少了缝合线上的细菌定植,从而改善了临床结果。结论:本研究表明,与传统缝合线相比,三氯生涂层缝合线减少了拔牙时的感染和炎症,可能是由于细菌定植减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书