Differentiating first episode of viral wheezing by assessing response to salbutamol nebulization in children 6 months to 2 years of age admitted as bronchiolitis-a prospective cohort study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Kranthi Kumar Karrolla, Venkatesh Chandrasekaran, Rahul Dhodapkar
{"title":"Differentiating first episode of viral wheezing by assessing response to salbutamol nebulization in children 6 months to 2 years of age admitted as bronchiolitis-a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Kranthi Kumar Karrolla, Venkatesh Chandrasekaran, Rahul Dhodapkar","doi":"10.1093/tropej/fmag039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some infants diagnosed as bronchiolitis might actually be having their first episode of viral wheeze. Although wheezing is common to both conditions, their treatment approaches differ. The objectives of this study were to estimate the proportion of infants aged 6 months to 2 years with episodic viral wheeze (EVW) among those admitted as bronchiolitis, to determine the factors predicting salbutamol response, and to compare the short-term outcomes between them. This prospective observational study included infants admitted with bronchiolitis. Assuming that one fourth of them might be having EVW, with 5% alpha error and 80% power, the sample size was estimated to be 136, including an attrition of 10%. After obtaining parental consent, 2 doses of nebulized salbutamol were administered to assess treatment response. Baseline demographics, atopy status, and respiratory swab results were collected and analysed. The proportion of infants responding to salbutamol, the factors influencing response and the outcomes, were studied. Among the 137 participants studied, salbutamol response was observed in 50 (36.5%) and were designated as EVW. Family h/o atopy was seen in 25 (50%) participants in the EVW group compared to 13 (14.9%) in the bronchiolitis group (P = .0001). Shorter hospital stay (P = .018), oxygen (P = .016) and heated, humidified, high flow nasal cannula requirement (P = .03) was seen in EVW compared to the bronchiolitis group. To conclude, about one in three infants admitted as bronchiolitis presenting predominantly with wheeze, show a bronchodilator response. In them, a better treatment outcome is seen when managed as EVW.</p>","PeriodicalId":17521,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","volume":"72 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmag039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some infants diagnosed as bronchiolitis might actually be having their first episode of viral wheeze. Although wheezing is common to both conditions, their treatment approaches differ. The objectives of this study were to estimate the proportion of infants aged 6 months to 2 years with episodic viral wheeze (EVW) among those admitted as bronchiolitis, to determine the factors predicting salbutamol response, and to compare the short-term outcomes between them. This prospective observational study included infants admitted with bronchiolitis. Assuming that one fourth of them might be having EVW, with 5% alpha error and 80% power, the sample size was estimated to be 136, including an attrition of 10%. After obtaining parental consent, 2 doses of nebulized salbutamol were administered to assess treatment response. Baseline demographics, atopy status, and respiratory swab results were collected and analysed. The proportion of infants responding to salbutamol, the factors influencing response and the outcomes, were studied. Among the 137 participants studied, salbutamol response was observed in 50 (36.5%) and were designated as EVW. Family h/o atopy was seen in 25 (50%) participants in the EVW group compared to 13 (14.9%) in the bronchiolitis group (P = .0001). Shorter hospital stay (P = .018), oxygen (P = .016) and heated, humidified, high flow nasal cannula requirement (P = .03) was seen in EVW compared to the bronchiolitis group. To conclude, about one in three infants admitted as bronchiolitis presenting predominantly with wheeze, show a bronchodilator response. In them, a better treatment outcome is seen when managed as EVW.

通过评估6个月至2岁被诊断为细支气管炎的儿童对沙丁胺醇雾化的反应来鉴别首次发作的病毒性喘息——一项前瞻性队列研究
一些被诊断为细支气管炎的婴儿实际上可能有他们的第一次病毒性喘息发作。虽然喘息是常见的两种情况,他们的治疗方法不同。本研究的目的是估计因毛细支气管炎入院的6个月至2岁婴儿中发作性病毒性喘息(EVW)的比例,确定预测沙丁胺醇反应的因素,并比较它们之间的短期结果。这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了毛细支气管炎患儿。假设其中四分之一的人可能有EVW, alpha误差为5%,功率为80%,则样本量估计为136,其中包括10%的损耗率。经家长同意后,给予2剂沙丁胺醇雾化治疗,以评估治疗效果。收集和分析基线人口统计学、特应性状态和呼吸道拭子结果。研究婴儿对沙丁胺醇的反应比例、影响反应的因素及疗效。在137名受试者中,50人(36.5%)观察到沙丁胺醇反应,并被指定为EVW。EVW组有25名(50%)患者出现家族h/o特应性,而细支气管炎组有13名(14.9%)患者出现家族h/o特应性(P = 0.0001)。住院时间缩短(P =。与毛细支气管炎组相比,EVW中出现了氧气(P = 0.016)和加热、湿化、高流量鼻插管(P = 0.03)。综上所述,约三分之一的婴儿因毛细支气管炎入院,主要表现为喘息,表现为支气管扩张剂反应。在这些病例中,以EVW管理的治疗效果较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 医学-热带医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tropical Pediatrics provides a link between theory and practice in the field. Papers report key results of clinical and community research, and considerations of programme development. More general descriptive pieces are included when they have application to work preceeding elsewhere. The journal also presents review articles, book reviews and, occasionally, short monographs and selections of important papers delivered at relevant conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书