Evaluation of the Remineralisation and Antibacterial Properties of Propolis, Chitosan, and Theobromine.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Elif Yazan Sukur, Yeliz Guven, Nursen Topcuoglu, Sule Batu, Kaan Orhan, Elif Bahar Tuna Ince
{"title":"Evaluation of the Remineralisation and Antibacterial Properties of Propolis, Chitosan, and Theobromine.","authors":"Elif Yazan Sukur, Yeliz Guven, Nursen Topcuoglu, Sule Batu, Kaan Orhan, Elif Bahar Tuna Ince","doi":"10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the remineralisation potential of the natural compounds propolis, chitosan, and theobromine on artificial initial carious lesions and investigated their antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Artificial lesions were induced on buccal and lingual enamel surfaces of 14 extracted molars through a 72-h demineralisation process. Specimens were randomly assigned to seven groups (n = 4): propolis (100, 200 μg/mL), chitosan (1.25, 2.5 mg/ml), theobromine (100, 200 mg/L), and artificial saliva (control). Mineral density was assessed using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) at baseline, after demineralisation, and after pH cycling. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by broth microdilution, and antibiofilm effects were evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Micro-CT showed that both propolis groups exhibited mineral gain and % remineralisation values similar to the negative control, whereas chitosan and theobromine groups had significantly higher values (P 0.05). MIC values were 100 μg/ml for propolis and 0.15 mg/ml for chitosan, while theobromine showed no effect. Quantitative CLSM analysis revealed that only the propolis 200 µg/ml group had a significantly lower total biomass compared to the negative control (P 0.05). Additionally, both propolis groups demonstrated a significantly higher dead/live cell ratio than the negative control groups (P 0.05). However, no significant differences in dead/live cell ratios were observed among the chitosan, theobromine, and negative control groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chitosan and theobromine exhibited favourable outcomes in terms of remineralisation; however, their antimicrobial efficacy remained limited. In contrast, propolis exhibited promising antibacterial activity but lacked significant remineralisation capability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19696,"journal":{"name":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","volume":"24 ","pages":"395-404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13216888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2706","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the remineralisation potential of the natural compounds propolis, chitosan, and theobromine on artificial initial carious lesions and investigated their antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities.

Methods and materials: Artificial lesions were induced on buccal and lingual enamel surfaces of 14 extracted molars through a 72-h demineralisation process. Specimens were randomly assigned to seven groups (n = 4): propolis (100, 200 μg/mL), chitosan (1.25, 2.5 mg/ml), theobromine (100, 200 mg/L), and artificial saliva (control). Mineral density was assessed using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) at baseline, after demineralisation, and after pH cycling. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by broth microdilution, and antibiofilm effects were evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).

Results: Micro-CT showed that both propolis groups exhibited mineral gain and % remineralisation values similar to the negative control, whereas chitosan and theobromine groups had significantly higher values (P 0.05). MIC values were 100 μg/ml for propolis and 0.15 mg/ml for chitosan, while theobromine showed no effect. Quantitative CLSM analysis revealed that only the propolis 200 µg/ml group had a significantly lower total biomass compared to the negative control (P 0.05). Additionally, both propolis groups demonstrated a significantly higher dead/live cell ratio than the negative control groups (P 0.05). However, no significant differences in dead/live cell ratios were observed among the chitosan, theobromine, and negative control groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Chitosan and theobromine exhibited favourable outcomes in terms of remineralisation; however, their antimicrobial efficacy remained limited. In contrast, propolis exhibited promising antibacterial activity but lacked significant remineralisation capability.

蜂胶、壳聚糖和可可碱再矿化及抗菌性能的评价。
目的:研究天然化合物蜂胶、壳聚糖和可可碱对人工初始龋齿的再矿化潜力,并研究其抗菌和抗生物膜活性。方法与材料:对14颗拔除的磨牙进行72h脱矿处理,在颊、舌牙釉质表面诱导人工病变。将标本随机分为蜂胶(100、200 μg/mL)、壳聚糖(1.25、2.5 mg/ mL)、可可碱(100、200 mg/L)、人工唾液(对照)7组(n = 4)。在基线、脱矿后和pH循环后,使用微型计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)评估矿物质密度。采用微量肉汤稀释法测定其最低抑菌浓度(MIC),用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)评价其抗菌效果。结果:微ct显示,两组蜂胶的矿物增重和%再矿化值与阴性对照组相似,壳聚糖组和可可碱组的矿物增重和%再矿化值显著高于阴性对照组(p0.05)。蜂胶的MIC值为100 μg/ml,壳聚糖的MIC值为0.15 mg/ml,而可可碱对其无影响。定量CLSM分析显示,只有蜂胶200µg/ml组的总生物量显著低于阴性对照组(p0.05)。蜂胶组和蜂胶组的死活细胞比均显著高于阴性对照组(p0.05)。壳聚糖组、可可碱组和阴性对照组的死活细胞比差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:壳聚糖和可可碱在再矿化方面具有良好的效果;然而,它们的抗菌效果仍然有限。相比之下,蜂胶具有良好的抗菌活性,但缺乏明显的再矿化能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral health & preventive dentistry
Oral health & preventive dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinicians, general practitioners, teachers, researchers, and public health administrators will find this journal an indispensable source of essential, timely information about scientific progress in the fields of oral health and the prevention of caries, periodontal diseases, oral mucosal diseases, and dental trauma. Central topics, including oral hygiene, oral epidemiology, oral health promotion, and public health issues, are covered in peer-reviewed articles such as clinical and basic science research reports; reviews; invited focus articles, commentaries, and guest editorials; and symposium, workshop, and conference proceedings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书