Model-based optimization of properties of post-consumer recycled PP/PE blends via compatibilization

IF 5.1
Sixtus O. Nzeh, David O. Kazmer, Margaret J. SobkowiczKline, Thao D. Nguyen and David C. Elbert
{"title":"Model-based optimization of properties of post-consumer recycled PP/PE blends via compatibilization","authors":"Sixtus O. Nzeh, David O. Kazmer, Margaret J. SobkowiczKline, Thao D. Nguyen and David C. Elbert","doi":"10.1039/D5LP00321K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The reuse of post-consumer recycled polypropylene (rPP) is limited by poor processability, immiscibility with polyethylene (PE), and reduced mechanical properties. This work applies compatibilization strategies and regression-based optimization to improve the performance of a monolayer cast-film of a commercial recyclate containing ∼55 wt% PP and ∼45 wt% HDPE. Three compatibilizers were examined: maleic anhydride-grafted-polyethylene (PEMA), maleic anhydride-grafted-polypropylene (PPMA), and an ethylene–propylene copolymer (EPB). Tensile testing in the machine (MD) and transverse (TD) directions, FTIR, and SEM were combined with multiple regression to guide blend formulation. PEMA and PPMA exhibited quadratic effects on yield stress with optima near 8–11 wt%, whereas EPB showed a positive linear effect on modulus. At practical loadings, model coefficients correspond to gains of ∼6.1 MPa and ∼4.2 MPa in yield stress for 10 wt% PEMA and PPMA respectively, and ∼+5 MPa and +170 MPa in yield stress and modulus respectively for 20 wt% EPB. Two model-guided blends: (i) single-objective optimization (based on PEMA/EPB) and (ii) multiple objective optimization (based on PEMA/PPMA/EPB), produced smoother films and improved stiffness–ductility balance relative to the uncompatibilized recyclate. Single-objective optimization improved elongation by 3776% (MD) and 1371% (TD), with strength gains of up to 448%. Multiple-objective optimization incorporating 2% PPMA achieved the best balance, combining 1686% higher elongation (TD) with 491% higher yield stress and 240% higher stiffness SEM indicated reduced voiding and more cohesive fracture surfaces; FTIR remained consistent with physical interfacial anchoring/bridging rather than new covalent bonding. These results highlight a materials design pathway to enable reliable, high-performance use of recycled PP/PE blends in film and packaging applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":101139,"journal":{"name":"RSC Applied Polymers","volume":" 3","pages":" 1042-1060"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2026/lp/d5lp00321k?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC Applied Polymers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2026/lp/d5lp00321k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reuse of post-consumer recycled polypropylene (rPP) is limited by poor processability, immiscibility with polyethylene (PE), and reduced mechanical properties. This work applies compatibilization strategies and regression-based optimization to improve the performance of a monolayer cast-film of a commercial recyclate containing ∼55 wt% PP and ∼45 wt% HDPE. Three compatibilizers were examined: maleic anhydride-grafted-polyethylene (PEMA), maleic anhydride-grafted-polypropylene (PPMA), and an ethylene–propylene copolymer (EPB). Tensile testing in the machine (MD) and transverse (TD) directions, FTIR, and SEM were combined with multiple regression to guide blend formulation. PEMA and PPMA exhibited quadratic effects on yield stress with optima near 8–11 wt%, whereas EPB showed a positive linear effect on modulus. At practical loadings, model coefficients correspond to gains of ∼6.1 MPa and ∼4.2 MPa in yield stress for 10 wt% PEMA and PPMA respectively, and ∼+5 MPa and +170 MPa in yield stress and modulus respectively for 20 wt% EPB. Two model-guided blends: (i) single-objective optimization (based on PEMA/EPB) and (ii) multiple objective optimization (based on PEMA/PPMA/EPB), produced smoother films and improved stiffness–ductility balance relative to the uncompatibilized recyclate. Single-objective optimization improved elongation by 3776% (MD) and 1371% (TD), with strength gains of up to 448%. Multiple-objective optimization incorporating 2% PPMA achieved the best balance, combining 1686% higher elongation (TD) with 491% higher yield stress and 240% higher stiffness SEM indicated reduced voiding and more cohesive fracture surfaces; FTIR remained consistent with physical interfacial anchoring/bridging rather than new covalent bonding. These results highlight a materials design pathway to enable reliable, high-performance use of recycled PP/PE blends in film and packaging applications.

Abstract Image

基于模型的消费后再生PP/PE共混物相容性优化
消费后再生聚丙烯(rPP)的再利用受到加工性差,与聚乙烯(PE)不混溶以及机械性能降低的限制。这项工作应用相容策略和基于回归的优化来提高含有~ 55 wt% PP和~ 45 wt% HDPE的商业回收单层铸膜的性能。研究了三种增容剂:马来酸酐接枝聚乙烯(PEMA)、马来酸酐接枝聚丙烯(PPMA)和乙烯-丙烯共聚物(EPB)。通过纵向拉伸试验(MD)和横向拉伸试验(TD)、红外光谱(FTIR)和扫描电镜(SEM)结合多元回归来指导共混料配方。PEMA和PPMA对屈服应力表现出二次效应,最优值接近8 - 11wt %,而EPB对模量表现出正线性效应。在实际载荷下,模型系数对应于10 wt% PEMA和PPMA的屈服应力增益分别为~ 6.1 MPa和~ 4.2 MPa,以及20 wt% EPB的屈服应力和模量增益分别为~ +5 MPa和+170 MPa。两种模型导向的共混物:(i)单目标优化(基于PEMA/EPB)和(ii)多目标优化(基于PEMA/PPMA/EPB)产生了更光滑的薄膜,并且相对于未相容的回收物改善了刚度-延性平衡。单目标优化后,伸长率分别提高了3776% (MD)和1371% (TD),强度提高了448%。采用2% PPMA的多目标优化达到了最佳平衡,伸长率提高1686%,屈服应力提高491%,刚度SEM提高240%,表明气孔减少,断口黏结性增强;FTIR仍然与物理界面锚定/桥接一致,而不是新的共价键。这些结果突出了在薄膜和包装应用中可靠、高性能地使用再生PP/PE混合物的材料设计途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书