Ezgi Gültekin Güner, Ahmet Güner, Veysel Ozan Tanık, Ebru Serin, Sezer Markirt, Mehmet Erdoğan, Muhammed Furkan Deniz, Ali Nazmi Çalık, Serkan Asil, Enes Arslan, Kurtuluş Karaüzüm, Semih Kalkan, Ahmet Anıl Başkurt, Faruk Kara, Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici, Saner Bahadır Gök, Özge Çebi, Aylin Şafak, Kaan Gökçe, Koray Çiloğlu, Abdullah Doğan, Onur Sönmez, Fatih Furkan Bedir, Ahmet Gürdal, Cemal Özanalp, Çağatay Tunca, Kürşat Akbuğa, Ali Öztürk, Mustafa Kırmızıgül, Didar Mirzamidinov, Cemalettin Akman, Furkan Durak, Elif Uslu, Serhat Agüloglu, Eyüp Karaer, Günsel Göksoylu, İbrahim Halil Uygun, Uygar Çağdaş Yüksel, İbrahim Faruk Aktürk, Kudret Keskin, İrfan Şahin, Hatice Tolunay, Fatih Uzun
{"title":"PCI for Ostial Stenosis of Left Circumflex or Left Anterior Descending Artery","authors":"Ezgi Gültekin Güner, Ahmet Güner, Veysel Ozan Tanık, Ebru Serin, Sezer Markirt, Mehmet Erdoğan, Muhammed Furkan Deniz, Ali Nazmi Çalık, Serkan Asil, Enes Arslan, Kurtuluş Karaüzüm, Semih Kalkan, Ahmet Anıl Başkurt, Faruk Kara, Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici, Saner Bahadır Gök, Özge Çebi, Aylin Şafak, Kaan Gökçe, Koray Çiloğlu, Abdullah Doğan, Onur Sönmez, Fatih Furkan Bedir, Ahmet Gürdal, Cemal Özanalp, Çağatay Tunca, Kürşat Akbuğa, Ali Öztürk, Mustafa Kırmızıgül, Didar Mirzamidinov, Cemalettin Akman, Furkan Durak, Elif Uslu, Serhat Agüloglu, Eyüp Karaer, Günsel Göksoylu, İbrahim Halil Uygun, Uygar Çağdaş Yüksel, İbrahim Faruk Aktürk, Kudret Keskin, İrfan Şahin, Hatice Tolunay, Fatih Uzun","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To date, the clinical outcome of ostial stent implantation (OSI) in patients with ostial left circumflex artery (LCX) or left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesions has not been well established. This study sought to assess the cardiovascular outcomes of the ostial stent implantation (OSI) for the ostial LAD or LCX lesions under long-term follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This large-scale, multicenter (<i>n</i> = 13) observational, retrospective study included 839 patients (men: 619 [73.8%], mean age: 61.36 ± 11.93 years) who underwent PCI with OSI for ostial LAD or LCX lesions between 2014 and 2025. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, target lesion revascularisation, and target vessel myocardial infarction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study cohort was divided into two groups: ostial LAD (<i>n</i> = 590) and ostial LCX (<i>n</i> = 249) revascularized with OSI. SYNTAX scores and the utilization of intravascular imaging rates were similar in both groups. Total stent length (22.79 ± 7.37 vs. 24.60 ± 7.57 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.001) was notably lower in the LCX group; however, the rate of bailout 2-stent technique (6.4 vs. 2.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.010) was significantly higher in the LCX group than in the LAD group. The risk-adjusted long-term MACE (HR: 1.591, <i>p</i> = 0.010) significantly differed in individuals with left-sided ostial lesions to revascularize with OSI. Additionally, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, intravascular imaging, reduced left ventricle ejection fraction, high SYNTAX score, statin usage, and total stent length were found to be independent predictors of MACE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This multicenter study demonstrates that the location of ostial stenosis in LCX was associated with a higher risk-adjusted MACE rate at long-term follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"108 2","pages":"426-436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.70670","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
To date, the clinical outcome of ostial stent implantation (OSI) in patients with ostial left circumflex artery (LCX) or left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesions has not been well established. This study sought to assess the cardiovascular outcomes of the ostial stent implantation (OSI) for the ostial LAD or LCX lesions under long-term follow-up.
Methods
This large-scale, multicenter (n = 13) observational, retrospective study included 839 patients (men: 619 [73.8%], mean age: 61.36 ± 11.93 years) who underwent PCI with OSI for ostial LAD or LCX lesions between 2014 and 2025. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, target lesion revascularisation, and target vessel myocardial infarction.
Results
The study cohort was divided into two groups: ostial LAD (n = 590) and ostial LCX (n = 249) revascularized with OSI. SYNTAX scores and the utilization of intravascular imaging rates were similar in both groups. Total stent length (22.79 ± 7.37 vs. 24.60 ± 7.57 mm, p = 0.001) was notably lower in the LCX group; however, the rate of bailout 2-stent technique (6.4 vs. 2.7%, p = 0.010) was significantly higher in the LCX group than in the LAD group. The risk-adjusted long-term MACE (HR: 1.591, p = 0.010) significantly differed in individuals with left-sided ostial lesions to revascularize with OSI. Additionally, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, intravascular imaging, reduced left ventricle ejection fraction, high SYNTAX score, statin usage, and total stent length were found to be independent predictors of MACE.
Conclusions
This multicenter study demonstrates that the location of ostial stenosis in LCX was associated with a higher risk-adjusted MACE rate at long-term follow-up.
背景:迄今为止,对于有左旋口动脉(LCX)或左前降支(LAD)病变的患者,进行口内支架植入术(OSI)的临床结果尚未得到很好的确定。本研究旨在评估在长期随访下,经口支架植入术(OSI)治疗口LAD或LCX病变的心血管预后。方法:这项大规模、多中心(n = 13)的观察性、回顾性研究纳入了2014年至2025年间接受PCI + OSI治疗口侧LAD或LCX病变的839例患者(男性:619例[73.8%],平均年龄:61.36±11.93岁)。主要终点是主要心脏不良事件(MACE),包括心源性死亡、靶病变血运重建和靶血管心肌梗死。结果:研究队列分为两组:经OSI重建的LAD (n = 590)和LCX (n = 249)。SYNTAX评分和血管内显像利用率在两组中相似。LCX组支架总长度(22.79±7.37 vs 24.60±7.57 mm, p = 0.001)明显低于LCX组;然而,LCX组救出2个支架技术的比率(6.4 vs 2.7%, p = 0.010)显著高于LAD组。经风险调整后的长期MACE (HR: 1.591, p = 0.010)在左口病变患者中存在显著差异。此外,糖尿病、慢性肾病、血管内成像、左心室射血分数降低、SYNTAX评分高、他汀类药物使用和总支架长度被发现是MACE的独立预测因素。结论:这项多中心研究表明,在长期随访中,LCX口狭窄的位置与较高的风险调整后的MACE率相关。
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.