Evaluation of the Efficacy of Treatment for Convergence Insufficiency with a New Digital Mobile Platform: A Comparative Preliminary Study.

IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine
Alba Pina-Balofer, David P Piñero, Miranda Buigues, Carlo Cavaliere-Ballesta, Sergio Viudes, Laurent Bataille
{"title":"Evaluation of the Efficacy of Treatment for Convergence Insufficiency with a New Digital Mobile Platform: A Comparative Preliminary Study.","authors":"Alba Pina-Balofer, David P Piñero, Miranda Buigues, Carlo Cavaliere-Ballesta, Sergio Viudes, Laurent Bataille","doi":"10.3390/vision10020031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel digital platform (Visitrain VG, Alicante, Spain) as a visual rehabilitation tool for patients with convergence insufficiency (CI), in comparison with conventional in-office vision therapy (VT) supplemented with home reinforcement exercises. A retrospective comparative study was conducted comprising 33 patients diagnosed with CI, allocated into two groups: a digital group (DG; <i>n</i> = 16) receiving treatment with the aforementioned digital platform and a conventional group (CG; <i>n</i> = 17) undergoing conventional vision therapy. Binocular vision clinical parameters were assessed at baseline, one month, and three months of follow-up, including near point of convergence (NPC), positive fusional vergence (PFV), and binocular accommodative facility (BAF). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements following three months (<i>p</i> < 0.050). At the one-month evaluation, the CG showed a more rapid clinical response, with statistically significant between-group differences being observed in the NPC (<i>p</i> = 0.004) and near PFV (<i>p</i> = 0.040) compared with the DG. Nevertheless, at the three-month follow-up, no significant differences were found between the groups (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.060). The digital platform under investigation appears to constitute an effective therapeutic alternative to conventional vision therapy, albeit with a comparatively slower initial clinical response rate. It may be particularly indicated for patients requiring greater scheduling flexibility or those with limited access to in-office clinical care. Prospective controlled clinical trials are warranted to corroborate these preliminary outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13214658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision (Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision10020031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel digital platform (Visitrain VG, Alicante, Spain) as a visual rehabilitation tool for patients with convergence insufficiency (CI), in comparison with conventional in-office vision therapy (VT) supplemented with home reinforcement exercises. A retrospective comparative study was conducted comprising 33 patients diagnosed with CI, allocated into two groups: a digital group (DG; n = 16) receiving treatment with the aforementioned digital platform and a conventional group (CG; n = 17) undergoing conventional vision therapy. Binocular vision clinical parameters were assessed at baseline, one month, and three months of follow-up, including near point of convergence (NPC), positive fusional vergence (PFV), and binocular accommodative facility (BAF). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements following three months (p < 0.050). At the one-month evaluation, the CG showed a more rapid clinical response, with statistically significant between-group differences being observed in the NPC (p = 0.004) and near PFV (p = 0.040) compared with the DG. Nevertheless, at the three-month follow-up, no significant differences were found between the groups (p ≥ 0.060). The digital platform under investigation appears to constitute an effective therapeutic alternative to conventional vision therapy, albeit with a comparatively slower initial clinical response rate. It may be particularly indicated for patients requiring greater scheduling flexibility or those with limited access to in-office clinical care. Prospective controlled clinical trials are warranted to corroborate these preliminary outcomes.

一种新型数字移动平台治疗会聚功能不全的疗效评价:比较初步研究。
本研究的目的是评估一种新型数字平台(Visitrain VG,阿利坎特,西班牙)作为会聚功能不全(CI)患者的视觉康复工具的效果,并与传统的办公室视力治疗(VT)补充家庭强化练习进行比较。对33例CI患者进行回顾性比较研究,分为两组:数字组(DG, n = 16)接受上述数字平台治疗,传统组(CG, n = 17)接受常规视力治疗。在基线、随访1个月和随访3个月时评估双眼视力临床参数,包括近会聚点(NPC)、正会聚点(PFV)和双眼调节设施(BAF)。三个月后两组均有显著改善(p < 0.050)。在一个月的评估中,CG表现出更快的临床反应,与DG相比,NPC (p = 0.004)和PFV附近(p = 0.040)的组间差异具有统计学意义。然而,在三个月的随访中,各组间无显著差异(p≥0.060)。正在研究的数字平台似乎构成了传统视力治疗的有效替代治疗方案,尽管初始临床反应率相对较慢。它可能特别适用于需要更大的日程安排灵活性或那些有限的获得办公室临床护理的患者。有必要进行前瞻性对照临床试验来证实这些初步结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vision (Switzerland)
Vision (Switzerland) Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书