Challenges and Solutions in Low-Biomass Respiratory Microbiome Profiling: A Workflow for Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Sequencing in Guinea Pigs.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Physiological research Pub Date : 2026-05-12
T Burjanivova, T Buday, D Mokra, Z Hanzlikova, E Babusikova, P Podlesniy, V Holubekova, J Budis, T Szemes, J Plevkova
{"title":"Challenges and Solutions in Low-Biomass Respiratory Microbiome Profiling: A Workflow for Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Sequencing in Guinea Pigs.","authors":"T Burjanivova, T Buday, D Mokra, Z Hanzlikova, E Babusikova, P Podlesniy, V Holubekova, J Budis, T Szemes, J Plevkova","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate profiling of the respiratory microbiome in low-biomass samples remains technically challenging due to host DNA contamination and limited microbial yield. This study aimed to optimize a methodological workflow for 16S rRNA sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) obtained from guinea pig models with differing microbial statuses-specific pathogen-free (SPF) and conventionally bred (CON) animals. Using a comparative approach, we evaluated six commercial DNA extraction kits and tested different input DNA concentrations (1 ng vs. 0.5 ng) to enhance microbial detection while minimizing host DNA interference. Among the tested kits, only the ZymoBIOMICS DNA Microprep Kit yielded sufficient microbial DNA for downstream analysis. Real-time PCR and droplet digital PCR confirmed the microbial origin of the extracted DNA. Sequencing libraries were prepared from the V1-V3 regions of 16S rRNA genes and sequenced using the Illumina iSeq 100 platform. Taxonomic assignment and diversity metrics were analyzed using the MicrobAT pipeline. Our findings revealed significant differences in microbial composition between SPF and CON animals, notably in Mycoplasma abundance, which dominated the microbiota in CON but was nearly absent in SPF animals. Alpha and beta diversity metrics showed consistent stratification by animal group and input DNA concentration. However, a high proportion of unclassified reads-particularly in SPF samples-correlated strongly with sequences mapping to the Cavia porcellus genome, indicating substantial host DNA contamination. This study demonstrates the feasibility of microbiome profiling from low-biomass BALF samples in guinea pigs while highlighting the limitations of current sequencing and bioinformatic tools in distinguishing microbial from host-derived DNA. Our optimized workflow supports future respiratory microbiome studies in animal models and provides a foundation for improving host DNA depletion and reference databases tailored to non-human species.</p>","PeriodicalId":20235,"journal":{"name":"Physiological research","volume":"75 2","pages":"337-348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13225453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate profiling of the respiratory microbiome in low-biomass samples remains technically challenging due to host DNA contamination and limited microbial yield. This study aimed to optimize a methodological workflow for 16S rRNA sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) obtained from guinea pig models with differing microbial statuses-specific pathogen-free (SPF) and conventionally bred (CON) animals. Using a comparative approach, we evaluated six commercial DNA extraction kits and tested different input DNA concentrations (1 ng vs. 0.5 ng) to enhance microbial detection while minimizing host DNA interference. Among the tested kits, only the ZymoBIOMICS DNA Microprep Kit yielded sufficient microbial DNA for downstream analysis. Real-time PCR and droplet digital PCR confirmed the microbial origin of the extracted DNA. Sequencing libraries were prepared from the V1-V3 regions of 16S rRNA genes and sequenced using the Illumina iSeq 100 platform. Taxonomic assignment and diversity metrics were analyzed using the MicrobAT pipeline. Our findings revealed significant differences in microbial composition between SPF and CON animals, notably in Mycoplasma abundance, which dominated the microbiota in CON but was nearly absent in SPF animals. Alpha and beta diversity metrics showed consistent stratification by animal group and input DNA concentration. However, a high proportion of unclassified reads-particularly in SPF samples-correlated strongly with sequences mapping to the Cavia porcellus genome, indicating substantial host DNA contamination. This study demonstrates the feasibility of microbiome profiling from low-biomass BALF samples in guinea pigs while highlighting the limitations of current sequencing and bioinformatic tools in distinguishing microbial from host-derived DNA. Our optimized workflow supports future respiratory microbiome studies in animal models and provides a foundation for improving host DNA depletion and reference databases tailored to non-human species.

低生物量呼吸微生物组分析的挑战和解决方案:豚鼠支气管肺泡灌洗液测序工作流程
由于宿主DNA污染和微生物产量有限,在低生物量样品中准确分析呼吸道微生物组在技术上仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在优化从不同微生物状态的豚鼠模型中获得的支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)的16S rRNA测序的方法学工作流程-特异性无病原体(SPF)和常规饲养(CON)动物。采用比较方法,我们评估了六种商业DNA提取试剂盒,并测试了不同的输入DNA浓度(1 ng和0.5 ng),以增强微生物检测,同时最大限度地减少宿主DNA干扰。在测试的试剂盒中,只有ZymoBIOMICS DNA Microprep试剂盒产生了足够的下游分析的微生物DNA。Real-time PCR和液滴数字PCR证实了提取DNA的微生物来源。从16S rRNA基因的V1-V3区域制备测序文库,使用Illumina iSeq 100平台进行测序。使用MicrobAT管道分析分类分配和多样性指标。我们的研究结果显示SPF动物和CON动物的微生物组成存在显著差异,特别是支原体丰度,支原体在CON动物的微生物群中占主导地位,而在SPF动物中几乎没有。α和β多样性指标显示动物组和输入DNA浓度的分层一致。然而,高比例的未分类读数-特别是SPF样本-与Cavia porcellus基因组序列强烈相关,表明存在大量宿主DNA污染。该研究证明了从豚鼠低生物量BALF样本中分析微生物组的可行性,同时强调了当前测序和生物信息学工具在区分微生物和宿主来源DNA方面的局限性。我们优化的工作流程支持未来动物模型的呼吸微生物组研究,并为改进宿主DNA耗尽和针对非人类物种的参考数据库提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological research
Physiological research 医学-生理学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Research is a peer reviewed Open Access journal that publishes articles on normal and pathological physiology, biochemistry, biophysics, and pharmacology. Authors can submit original, previously unpublished research articles, review articles, rapid or short communications. Instructions for Authors - Respect the instructions carefully when submitting your manuscript. Submitted manuscripts or revised manuscripts that do not follow these Instructions will not be included into the peer-review process. The articles are available in full versions as pdf files beginning with volume 40, 1991. The journal publishes the online Ahead of Print /Pre-Press version of the articles that are searchable in Medline and can be cited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书