Dislocation is associated with increased mortality following revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip fractures.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Samuel B Morgan, Michael Nitikman, Alexander Mavromatis, Wade Gofton, Simon Garceau, George Grammatopoulos
{"title":"Dislocation is associated with increased mortality following revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip fractures.","authors":"Samuel B Morgan, Michael Nitikman, Alexander Mavromatis, Wade Gofton, Simon Garceau, George Grammatopoulos","doi":"10.1177/11207000261441541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prevalence of periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) is continuously increasing. This study aimed to: (1) report on outcomes following revision THA (r-THA) for PPFs; (2) identify factors associated with mortality; and (3) report on the performance of modular tapered fluted stems (MFTs) as the revision stem-type of choice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective, consecutive case series of all femoral PPFs treated with r-THA at an academic, tertiary-referral centre between 2008 and 2023. Patients managed solely with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) were excluded. Demographic and clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. Radiographic analysis was used to assess canal filling ratio, fracture union, stem subsidence, stability and survivorship. Primary outcomes measured included reoperations and mortality as well as stem survivorship free of re-revision at latest follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>96 patients/hips satisfied criteria (mean age: 76 years; 62% female). Most (83%) underwent rTHA for Vancouver B2 fractures. Dislocation post rTHA was detected in 10% of patients. 29% of patients required reoperation. Mortality rates at 30 days and 1 year were 4% and 10%, respectively. Patient- (higher Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] 1.70 ± 1.49 vs. 0.80 ± 1.57, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and surgical- (dislocation post-rTHA - 30%, [OR 4.8] <i>p</i> = 0.03) factors were associated with 1-year mortality. MFTs (<i>n</i> = 83) demonstrated a 2-year and 5-year all-cause re-revision survivorships of 95.2% (95% CI, 87.9-99.7) and 94.0% (95% CI, 79.0-97.0), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative mortality following rTHA for PPF is associated with patient and surgical factors. While we did not establish a causal relationship, as dislocation is associated with increased mortality, surgeons should strongly consider the use of dual-mobility or constrained liner bearings at revision when conversion of acetabular bearing surface is possible. MFTs are a reliable option when used during rTHA for an indication of PPF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"11207000261441541"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000261441541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prevalence of periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) is continuously increasing. This study aimed to: (1) report on outcomes following revision THA (r-THA) for PPFs; (2) identify factors associated with mortality; and (3) report on the performance of modular tapered fluted stems (MFTs) as the revision stem-type of choice.

Methods: This is a retrospective, consecutive case series of all femoral PPFs treated with r-THA at an academic, tertiary-referral centre between 2008 and 2023. Patients managed solely with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) were excluded. Demographic and clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. Radiographic analysis was used to assess canal filling ratio, fracture union, stem subsidence, stability and survivorship. Primary outcomes measured included reoperations and mortality as well as stem survivorship free of re-revision at latest follow-up.

Results: 96 patients/hips satisfied criteria (mean age: 76 years; 62% female). Most (83%) underwent rTHA for Vancouver B2 fractures. Dislocation post rTHA was detected in 10% of patients. 29% of patients required reoperation. Mortality rates at 30 days and 1 year were 4% and 10%, respectively. Patient- (higher Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] 1.70 ± 1.49 vs. 0.80 ± 1.57, p = 0.02) and surgical- (dislocation post-rTHA - 30%, [OR 4.8] p = 0.03) factors were associated with 1-year mortality. MFTs (n = 83) demonstrated a 2-year and 5-year all-cause re-revision survivorships of 95.2% (95% CI, 87.9-99.7) and 94.0% (95% CI, 79.0-97.0), respectively.

Conclusions: Postoperative mortality following rTHA for PPF is associated with patient and surgical factors. While we did not establish a causal relationship, as dislocation is associated with increased mortality, surgeons should strongly consider the use of dual-mobility or constrained liner bearings at revision when conversion of acetabular bearing surface is possible. MFTs are a reliable option when used during rTHA for an indication of PPF.

脱位与假体周围髋部骨折翻修全髋关节置换术后死亡率增加有关。
导言:假体周围骨折(PPFs)的患病率持续上升。本研究旨在:(1)报告PPFs修订THA (r-THA)后的结果;(2)确定与死亡率相关的因素;(3)报告模块化锥形槽型阀杆(MFTs)作为修正阀杆类型选择的性能。方法:回顾性分析2008年至2023年在学术三级转诊中心接受r-THA治疗的所有股骨PPFs的连续病例系列。排除单纯采用切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗的患者。从电子病历中收集人口统计和临床数据。影像学分析用于评估根管填充率、骨折愈合、根管下沉、稳定性和存活率。测量的主要结果包括再手术和死亡率,以及在最近随访中没有再翻修的干细胞存活率。结果:96例患者/髋部满足标准(平均年龄76岁,62%为女性)。大多数(83%)的Vancouver B2骨折患者接受了rTHA。10%的患者在rTHA后发现脱位。29%的患者需要再次手术。30天和1年死亡率分别为4%和10%。患者-(较高Charlson合并症指数[CCI] 1.70±1.49比0.80±1.57,p = 0.02)和手术- (rtha后脱位- 30%,[OR 4.8] p = 0.03)因素与1年死亡率相关。MFTs (n = 83)显示2年和5年的全因再修正生存率分别为95.2% (95% CI, 87.9-99.7)和94.0% (95% CI, 79.0-97.0)。结论:PPF rTHA术后死亡率与患者和手术因素有关。虽然我们没有建立因果关系,但脱位与死亡率增加有关,当髋臼关节面可以转换时,外科医生应强烈考虑在翻修时使用双活动或受限衬套轴承。在rTHA期间使用mft作为PPF的指征是一个可靠的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书