Beyond the Gini index: a poverty-normalized spatial Bayesian model for assessing territorial inequality.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Xavier Perafita, Marta Solans, Laura Vilà-Quintana, Maria Antònia Barceló, Marc Saez
{"title":"Beyond the Gini index: a poverty-normalized spatial Bayesian model for assessing territorial inequality.","authors":"Xavier Perafita, Marta Solans, Laura Vilà-Quintana, Maria Antònia Barceló, Marc Saez","doi":"10.1186/s12939-026-02890-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Gini index is one of the most widely used measures of income inequality. However, it has limitations in allowing reliable comparisons across areas with different socio-economic structures, particularly in small populations, where the index can be highly unstable. This study explores a simple modification of the Gini index that can overcome some of these limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We propose a modification of the original Gini index that incorporates the poverty rate as an offset. Combined with Bayesian spatial modelling, this approach improves the precision and comparability of small-area estimates, by providing measures of inequality conditional on local poverty levels. To illustrate it, income data from 8,043 Spanish municipalities for the year 2022 were used, and the spatial patterns of the normalized Gini index were compared with those obtained from the original index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The normalized Gini index revealed spatial inequality patterns that were overlooked by the original index. The new approach identified municipalities with higher levels of inequality than expected given their poverty rates in Andalusia, Extremadura, and Murcia, in contrast to lower inequality in Catalonia, Basque Country, Madrid, and Balearic Islands. In addition, while the original Gini index increased with population density and urbanization, the normalized version showed an opposite trend, with higher relative inequality observed in rural and low-density municipalities after accounting for local poverty levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given its simplicity, reliance on widely available indicators, and adaptability to different territorial scales, the proposed method offers a useful measure for describing income inequality conditional on a region's poverty level and informing local redistributive policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13397631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-026-02890-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Gini index is one of the most widely used measures of income inequality. However, it has limitations in allowing reliable comparisons across areas with different socio-economic structures, particularly in small populations, where the index can be highly unstable. This study explores a simple modification of the Gini index that can overcome some of these limitations.

Methods: We propose a modification of the original Gini index that incorporates the poverty rate as an offset. Combined with Bayesian spatial modelling, this approach improves the precision and comparability of small-area estimates, by providing measures of inequality conditional on local poverty levels. To illustrate it, income data from 8,043 Spanish municipalities for the year 2022 were used, and the spatial patterns of the normalized Gini index were compared with those obtained from the original index.

Results: The normalized Gini index revealed spatial inequality patterns that were overlooked by the original index. The new approach identified municipalities with higher levels of inequality than expected given their poverty rates in Andalusia, Extremadura, and Murcia, in contrast to lower inequality in Catalonia, Basque Country, Madrid, and Balearic Islands. In addition, while the original Gini index increased with population density and urbanization, the normalized version showed an opposite trend, with higher relative inequality observed in rural and low-density municipalities after accounting for local poverty levels.

Conclusions: Given its simplicity, reliance on widely available indicators, and adaptability to different territorial scales, the proposed method offers a useful measure for describing income inequality conditional on a region's poverty level and informing local redistributive policies.

超越基尼指数:用于评估地域不平等的贫困标准化空间贝叶斯模型。
背景:基尼系数是衡量收入不平等最广泛使用的指标之一。然而,它在不同社会经济结构的地区之间进行可靠比较方面存在局限性,特别是在人口较少的地区,指数可能非常不稳定。本研究探讨了对基尼指数的一种简单修改,可以克服其中的一些局限性。方法:我们建议对原始基尼指数进行修改,将贫困率作为抵消。结合贝叶斯空间模型,该方法通过提供以当地贫困水平为条件的不平等衡量标准,提高了小区域估计的精度和可比性。为了说明这一点,我们使用了西班牙8043个城市2022年的收入数据,并将归一化基尼系数的空间格局与原始指数的空间格局进行了比较。结果:归一化后的基尼指数揭示了被原始指数忽略的空间不平等格局。考虑到安达卢西亚、埃斯特雷马杜拉和穆尔西亚的贫困率,新方法确定了不平等程度高于预期的城市,而加泰罗尼亚、巴斯克地区、马德里和巴利阿里群岛的不平等程度较低。此外,虽然原始基尼指数随着人口密度和城市化而增加,但标准化版本显示出相反的趋势,在考虑当地贫困水平后,农村和低密度城市的相对不平等程度更高。结论:由于该方法简单、依赖于广泛可用的指标以及对不同地域尺度的适应性,该方法为描述一个地区贫困水平下的收入不平等提供了一个有用的衡量标准,并为当地的再分配政策提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书