Biomechanical Comparison of Sustained Dynamic Compression Screws vs Static Compression Screws in Subtalar Arthrodesis: A Cadaveric Study.

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2026-05-23 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114261449242
James Baker, Mariah Arave, James Johnson, David Safranski, Jeannie Huh
{"title":"Biomechanical Comparison of Sustained Dynamic Compression Screws vs Static Compression Screws in Subtalar Arthrodesis: A Cadaveric Study.","authors":"James Baker, Mariah Arave, James Johnson, David Safranski, Jeannie Huh","doi":"10.1177/24730114261449242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subtalar arthrodesis is a reliable procedure to address subtalar arthritis, though nonunion remains a challenge. Adequate compression is critical to optimizing fusion, but bone resorption and settling impair the ability of standard static compression (SC) screws to maintain compression. Sustained dynamic compression (SDC) screw constructs that use the pseudoelastic property of nitinol may enable more sustained compression than static compression screws.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten fresh talo-calcaneal cadaveric specimens were instrumented with either 2 SC screws or 2 SDC nitinol screws. Using a custom mechanical fixture, the compression force generated during and after screw insertion was measured in each group. The fixture was allowed to relax over a controlled distance and time to simulate bone resorption. The force at each relaxation point was measured, and the resorption capacity was calculated for each construct.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum compression at implantation was 430.2 ± 237.2 N for SC and 406.8 ± 117.7 N for SDC. After a 1-minute dwell period, compression was 299.6 ± 194.4 N for SC and 367.9 ± 108.0 N for SDC, corresponding to retention of 69.6% and 90.4% of initial compression, respectively. At 2 mm of simulated resorption, the SDC construct retained 111.1 ± 45.4 N compared with 8.3 ± 18.6 N for SC. The resorption capacity was 4.2 mm compared with 1.3 mm for the sustained dynamic compression and static constructs, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not detect a difference in initial compressive force between the SC and SDC screws. However, under identical bench conditions, the SDC construct retained more of its initial compression during the first minute and maintained substantially greater compression during simulated bone resorption than the SC construct. These findings support further study of whether sustained compression may help preserve fixation-generated preload during subtalar arthrodesis.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>In a cadaveric subtalar arthrodesis model, novel sustained dynamic compression screws retained more interfragmentary compression than standard static compression screws during early relaxation and simulated bone resorption. This technology may aid surgeons in maintaining compression despite postoperative settling or resorption during subtalar arthrodesis, particularly in higher-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"11 2","pages":"24730114261449242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13199687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114261449242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Subtalar arthrodesis is a reliable procedure to address subtalar arthritis, though nonunion remains a challenge. Adequate compression is critical to optimizing fusion, but bone resorption and settling impair the ability of standard static compression (SC) screws to maintain compression. Sustained dynamic compression (SDC) screw constructs that use the pseudoelastic property of nitinol may enable more sustained compression than static compression screws.

Methods: Ten fresh talo-calcaneal cadaveric specimens were instrumented with either 2 SC screws or 2 SDC nitinol screws. Using a custom mechanical fixture, the compression force generated during and after screw insertion was measured in each group. The fixture was allowed to relax over a controlled distance and time to simulate bone resorption. The force at each relaxation point was measured, and the resorption capacity was calculated for each construct.

Results: Maximum compression at implantation was 430.2 ± 237.2 N for SC and 406.8 ± 117.7 N for SDC. After a 1-minute dwell period, compression was 299.6 ± 194.4 N for SC and 367.9 ± 108.0 N for SDC, corresponding to retention of 69.6% and 90.4% of initial compression, respectively. At 2 mm of simulated resorption, the SDC construct retained 111.1 ± 45.4 N compared with 8.3 ± 18.6 N for SC. The resorption capacity was 4.2 mm compared with 1.3 mm for the sustained dynamic compression and static constructs, respectively.

Conclusion: We did not detect a difference in initial compressive force between the SC and SDC screws. However, under identical bench conditions, the SDC construct retained more of its initial compression during the first minute and maintained substantially greater compression during simulated bone resorption than the SC construct. These findings support further study of whether sustained compression may help preserve fixation-generated preload during subtalar arthrodesis.

Clinical relevance: In a cadaveric subtalar arthrodesis model, novel sustained dynamic compression screws retained more interfragmentary compression than standard static compression screws during early relaxation and simulated bone resorption. This technology may aid surgeons in maintaining compression despite postoperative settling or resorption during subtalar arthrodesis, particularly in higher-risk patients.

持续动态加压螺钉与静态加压螺钉在距下关节融合术中的生物力学比较:一项尸体研究。
背景:距下关节融合术是治疗距下关节炎的可靠方法,但骨不连仍然是一个挑战。充分的压缩是优化融合的关键,但骨吸收和沉降损害了标准静态压缩螺钉维持压缩的能力。利用镍钛诺的假弹性特性的持续动态压缩(SDC)螺钉结构可以比静态压缩螺钉实现更持久的压缩。方法:用2枚SC螺钉或2枚SDC镍钛诺螺钉固定10例新鲜距骨-跟骨尸体标本。使用定制的机械夹具,测量各组螺钉插入期间和之后产生的压缩力。允许固定装置在控制的距离和时间内放松以模拟骨吸收。测量了每个松弛点处的力,并计算了每个结构的吸收能力。结果:种植时SC的最大压力为430.2±237.2 N, SDC的最大压力为406.8±117.7 N。静置1分钟后,SC和SDC的压缩力分别为299.6±194.4 N和367.9±108.0 N,分别相当于初始压缩的69.6%和90.4%。在2 mm的模拟吸收下,SDC结构保留了111.1±45.4 N,而SC结构保留了8.3±18.6 N。持续动态压缩和静态结构的吸收能力分别为4.2 mm和1.3 mm。结论:我们没有发现SC和SDC螺钉的初始压缩力有差异。然而,在相同的实验条件下,与SC结构相比,SDC结构在第一分钟内保留了更多的初始压缩,并且在模拟骨吸收期间保持了更大的压缩。这些发现支持进一步研究持续压迫是否有助于保持距下关节融合术中固定产生的预载荷。临床相关性:在尸体距下关节融合术模型中,新型持续动态加压螺钉在早期松弛和模拟骨吸收期间比标准静态加压螺钉保留了更多的碎片间压缩性。这项技术可以帮助外科医生在距下关节融合术中维持压迫,尽管术后沉淀或吸收,特别是在高危患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书