Organisational readiness and preparedness for trauma-informed practice across UK frontline services: a mixed-methods study.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Nicola Cogan, Spence Whittaker, Alison Kirk, William Hodgson, Susan Rasmussen, Cherrie Short
{"title":"Organisational readiness and preparedness for trauma-informed practice across UK frontline services: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Nicola Cogan, Spence Whittaker, Alison Kirk, William Hodgson, Susan Rasmussen, Cherrie Short","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2026.2670135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Frontline professionals in health, social care, and emergency response settings are routinely exposed to traumatic events. Trauma-informed practice (TIP) frameworks emphasise organisational readiness, including leadership, systems, and culture, alongside organisational preparedness, referring to the practical capacity to recognise, respond to, and support trauma exposure. Despite increasing policy attention, there is limited empirical evidence that describes how frontline workers experience these organisational factors in practice and how they influence psychological safety, help-seeking, perceptions of workplace support and longer-term staff wellbeing following traumatic or distressing occupational experiences.<b>Objective:</b> This study explored frontline staff experiences of TIP across UK services, focusing on organisational readiness and preparedness and identifying strengths, gaps and priorities for improvement.<b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional online survey was completed by 325 frontline workers across the NHS, social care and emergency response sectors. The survey assessed four domains: organisational structures and systems, workplace culture and psychological safety, leadership and workforce capability and wellbeing and access to support. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Free-text responses from 198 participants were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and integrated with quantitative findings.<b>Results:</b> Participants described partial organisational readiness, including access to Employee Assistance Programmes, informal peer support and leadership endorsement of staff wellbeing. However, organisational preparedness to respond to trauma exposure was inconsistent. Psychological safety was limited, with many participants uncertain where to seek support and expressing concerns about confidentiality, stigma and professional consequences. Leadership training in trauma-informed approaches was limited, and communication about support pathways was often unclear.<b>Conclusions:</b> Frontline services demonstrate emerging strengths in trauma-informed readiness, but significant gaps remain in organisational preparedness. Key challenges relate to psychological safety, managerial capability, stigma and access to support. Strengthening leadership capability, improving communication, and creating safe, consistent pathways for help-seeking are essential to developing sustainable trauma-informed workplaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"17 1","pages":"2670135"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13215417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2026.2670135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frontline professionals in health, social care, and emergency response settings are routinely exposed to traumatic events. Trauma-informed practice (TIP) frameworks emphasise organisational readiness, including leadership, systems, and culture, alongside organisational preparedness, referring to the practical capacity to recognise, respond to, and support trauma exposure. Despite increasing policy attention, there is limited empirical evidence that describes how frontline workers experience these organisational factors in practice and how they influence psychological safety, help-seeking, perceptions of workplace support and longer-term staff wellbeing following traumatic or distressing occupational experiences.Objective: This study explored frontline staff experiences of TIP across UK services, focusing on organisational readiness and preparedness and identifying strengths, gaps and priorities for improvement.Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was completed by 325 frontline workers across the NHS, social care and emergency response sectors. The survey assessed four domains: organisational structures and systems, workplace culture and psychological safety, leadership and workforce capability and wellbeing and access to support. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Free-text responses from 198 participants were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and integrated with quantitative findings.Results: Participants described partial organisational readiness, including access to Employee Assistance Programmes, informal peer support and leadership endorsement of staff wellbeing. However, organisational preparedness to respond to trauma exposure was inconsistent. Psychological safety was limited, with many participants uncertain where to seek support and expressing concerns about confidentiality, stigma and professional consequences. Leadership training in trauma-informed approaches was limited, and communication about support pathways was often unclear.Conclusions: Frontline services demonstrate emerging strengths in trauma-informed readiness, but significant gaps remain in organisational preparedness. Key challenges relate to psychological safety, managerial capability, stigma and access to support. Strengthening leadership capability, improving communication, and creating safe, consistent pathways for help-seeking are essential to developing sustainable trauma-informed workplaces.

跨英国前线服务的创伤知情实践的组织准备和准备:混合方法研究。
背景:卫生、社会护理和应急反应领域的一线专业人员经常接触创伤性事件。创伤知情实践(TIP)框架强调组织准备,包括领导,系统和文化,以及组织准备,指的是识别,响应和支持创伤暴露的实际能力。尽管越来越多的政策关注,但有限的经验证据描述了一线工人在实践中如何体验这些组织因素,以及它们如何影响心理安全、寻求帮助、对工作场所支持的看法以及创伤或痛苦职业经历后员工的长期福祉。目的:本研究探讨了TIP在英国服务中的一线员工经验,重点关注组织准备和准备,并确定优势、差距和改进的优先事项。方法:对325名NHS、社会护理和应急部门的一线工作人员进行了横断面在线调查。该调查评估了四个领域:组织结构和系统、工作场所文化和心理安全、领导力和员工能力、幸福感以及获得支持的途径。定量数据进行描述性分析。198名参与者的自由文本回复使用反身性主题分析进行分析,并与定量结果相结合。结果:参与者描述了部分组织准备情况,包括获得员工援助计划,非正式同伴支持和领导对员工福利的认可。然而,组织应对创伤暴露的准备是不一致的。心理安全是有限的,许多参与者不确定去哪里寻求支持,并表达了对保密、耻辱和职业后果的担忧。在创伤知情方法方面的领导力培训是有限的,关于支持途径的沟通往往是不明确的。结论:一线服务在创伤知情准备方面显示出新兴优势,但在组织准备方面仍存在重大差距。主要挑战涉及心理安全、管理能力、耻辱和获得支持。加强领导能力,改善沟通,为寻求帮助创造安全、一致的途径,对于发展可持续的创伤知情工作场所至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书