Nicola Cogan, Spence Whittaker, Alison Kirk, William Hodgson, Susan Rasmussen, Cherrie Short
{"title":"Organisational readiness and preparedness for trauma-informed practice across UK frontline services: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Nicola Cogan, Spence Whittaker, Alison Kirk, William Hodgson, Susan Rasmussen, Cherrie Short","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2026.2670135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Frontline professionals in health, social care, and emergency response settings are routinely exposed to traumatic events. Trauma-informed practice (TIP) frameworks emphasise organisational readiness, including leadership, systems, and culture, alongside organisational preparedness, referring to the practical capacity to recognise, respond to, and support trauma exposure. Despite increasing policy attention, there is limited empirical evidence that describes how frontline workers experience these organisational factors in practice and how they influence psychological safety, help-seeking, perceptions of workplace support and longer-term staff wellbeing following traumatic or distressing occupational experiences.<b>Objective:</b> This study explored frontline staff experiences of TIP across UK services, focusing on organisational readiness and preparedness and identifying strengths, gaps and priorities for improvement.<b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional online survey was completed by 325 frontline workers across the NHS, social care and emergency response sectors. The survey assessed four domains: organisational structures and systems, workplace culture and psychological safety, leadership and workforce capability and wellbeing and access to support. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Free-text responses from 198 participants were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and integrated with quantitative findings.<b>Results:</b> Participants described partial organisational readiness, including access to Employee Assistance Programmes, informal peer support and leadership endorsement of staff wellbeing. However, organisational preparedness to respond to trauma exposure was inconsistent. Psychological safety was limited, with many participants uncertain where to seek support and expressing concerns about confidentiality, stigma and professional consequences. Leadership training in trauma-informed approaches was limited, and communication about support pathways was often unclear.<b>Conclusions:</b> Frontline services demonstrate emerging strengths in trauma-informed readiness, but significant gaps remain in organisational preparedness. Key challenges relate to psychological safety, managerial capability, stigma and access to support. Strengthening leadership capability, improving communication, and creating safe, consistent pathways for help-seeking are essential to developing sustainable trauma-informed workplaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"17 1","pages":"2670135"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13215417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2026.2670135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Frontline professionals in health, social care, and emergency response settings are routinely exposed to traumatic events. Trauma-informed practice (TIP) frameworks emphasise organisational readiness, including leadership, systems, and culture, alongside organisational preparedness, referring to the practical capacity to recognise, respond to, and support trauma exposure. Despite increasing policy attention, there is limited empirical evidence that describes how frontline workers experience these organisational factors in practice and how they influence psychological safety, help-seeking, perceptions of workplace support and longer-term staff wellbeing following traumatic or distressing occupational experiences.Objective: This study explored frontline staff experiences of TIP across UK services, focusing on organisational readiness and preparedness and identifying strengths, gaps and priorities for improvement.Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was completed by 325 frontline workers across the NHS, social care and emergency response sectors. The survey assessed four domains: organisational structures and systems, workplace culture and psychological safety, leadership and workforce capability and wellbeing and access to support. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Free-text responses from 198 participants were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and integrated with quantitative findings.Results: Participants described partial organisational readiness, including access to Employee Assistance Programmes, informal peer support and leadership endorsement of staff wellbeing. However, organisational preparedness to respond to trauma exposure was inconsistent. Psychological safety was limited, with many participants uncertain where to seek support and expressing concerns about confidentiality, stigma and professional consequences. Leadership training in trauma-informed approaches was limited, and communication about support pathways was often unclear.Conclusions: Frontline services demonstrate emerging strengths in trauma-informed readiness, but significant gaps remain in organisational preparedness. Key challenges relate to psychological safety, managerial capability, stigma and access to support. Strengthening leadership capability, improving communication, and creating safe, consistent pathways for help-seeking are essential to developing sustainable trauma-informed workplaces.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.