Perceived opportunities and risks of using deepfake technology in grief treatment: a qualitative study among Dutch bereaved people and mental health care workers.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jip Martijn van Oostrum, Defne Akalin, Lonneke Lenferink
{"title":"Perceived opportunities and risks of using deepfake technology in grief treatment: a qualitative study among Dutch bereaved people and mental health care workers.","authors":"Jip Martijn van Oostrum, Defne Akalin, Lonneke Lenferink","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2026.2663660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Deepfake technology, capable of simulating realistic representations of deceased people, is receiving growing attention as a potential technological tool in grief treatment. While its use has been explored in trauma treatment, its application in grief treatment remains unstudied.<b>Objective:</b> We examined how Dutch bereaved people and mental healthcare workers (MHCWs) perceive the usefulness and risks of using deepfake technology in grief treatment.<b>Method:</b> After viewing a videoclip of a deepfake grief intervention, participants listed three reasons for and against its use. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of open-ended survey responses from 159 bereaved people (86% women, <i>M</i>age = 55.09) and 126 MHCWs (81% women, <i>M</i>age = 39.75).<b>Results:</b> Bereaved people found deepfakes emotionally meaningful, envisioning them as a way to say goodbye, reconnect, or find closure. MHCWs acknowledged therapeutic potential, particularly as a supplement to established techniques (e.g. exposure, imagery rescripting), but highlighted ethical issues regarding misrepresentation, informed consent, and client safety. Both groups raised concerns about psychological risks, including hindrance of loss acceptance and emotional dependency, especially for vulnerable clients.<b>Conclusions:</b> Bereaved people valued opportunities for reconnection with the deceased, while MHCWs warned that such reconnection might impede grief processing. Both groups agreed that deepfakes may have therapeutic value if applied ethically, under therapist guidance, and with safeguards. Because participants were asked about hypothetical use, results reflect perceptions, not clinical effectiveness. Our findings underscore the need for ethical guidelines to balance bereaved people's needs with professional responsibility when exploring the therapeutic effects of deepfake technology in treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"17 1","pages":"2663660"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13215421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2026.2663660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deepfake technology, capable of simulating realistic representations of deceased people, is receiving growing attention as a potential technological tool in grief treatment. While its use has been explored in trauma treatment, its application in grief treatment remains unstudied.Objective: We examined how Dutch bereaved people and mental healthcare workers (MHCWs) perceive the usefulness and risks of using deepfake technology in grief treatment.Method: After viewing a videoclip of a deepfake grief intervention, participants listed three reasons for and against its use. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of open-ended survey responses from 159 bereaved people (86% women, Mage = 55.09) and 126 MHCWs (81% women, Mage = 39.75).Results: Bereaved people found deepfakes emotionally meaningful, envisioning them as a way to say goodbye, reconnect, or find closure. MHCWs acknowledged therapeutic potential, particularly as a supplement to established techniques (e.g. exposure, imagery rescripting), but highlighted ethical issues regarding misrepresentation, informed consent, and client safety. Both groups raised concerns about psychological risks, including hindrance of loss acceptance and emotional dependency, especially for vulnerable clients.Conclusions: Bereaved people valued opportunities for reconnection with the deceased, while MHCWs warned that such reconnection might impede grief processing. Both groups agreed that deepfakes may have therapeutic value if applied ethically, under therapist guidance, and with safeguards. Because participants were asked about hypothetical use, results reflect perceptions, not clinical effectiveness. Our findings underscore the need for ethical guidelines to balance bereaved people's needs with professional responsibility when exploring the therapeutic effects of deepfake technology in treatment.

在悲伤治疗中使用深度假技术的感知机会和风险:荷兰丧亲者和精神卫生保健工作者的定性研究。
背景:Deepfake技术能够模拟死者的真实表现,作为一种潜在的悲伤治疗技术工具,正受到越来越多的关注。虽然它在创伤治疗中的应用已被探索,但它在悲伤治疗中的应用仍未研究。目的:我们研究了荷兰的丧亲者和精神卫生保健工作者(MHCWs)如何看待在悲伤治疗中使用深度假技术的有用性和风险。方法:在观看了深度悲伤干预的视频剪辑后,参与者列出了三个支持和反对使用它的理由。我们对159名丧偶者(86%为女性,Mage = 55.09)和126名MHCWs(81%为女性,Mage = 39.75)的开放式调查反馈进行了定性内容分析。结果:失去亲人的人发现深度模仿在情感上是有意义的,他们把它们看作是说再见、重新联系或找到结束的一种方式。MHCWs承认治疗潜力,特别是作为现有技术的补充(如暴露、图像重写),但强调了有关虚假陈述、知情同意和客户安全的伦理问题。这两个群体都提出了心理风险的担忧,包括无法接受损失和情感依赖,尤其是对弱势客户而言。结论:失去亲人的人重视与死者重新联系的机会,而MHCWs警告说,这种重新联系可能会阻碍悲伤的处理。两组人都认为,如果在治疗师的指导下,在有保障的情况下,合乎道德地应用深度假手术,可能具有治疗价值。因为参与者被问及假设性使用,结果反映的是感知,而不是临床效果。我们的研究结果强调,在探索深度人工智能技术的治疗效果时,需要制定道德准则来平衡丧亲者的需求和职业责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书