Perceived opportunities and risks of using deepfake technology in grief treatment: a qualitative study among Dutch bereaved people and mental health care workers.
Jip Martijn van Oostrum, Defne Akalin, Lonneke Lenferink
{"title":"Perceived opportunities and risks of using deepfake technology in grief treatment: a qualitative study among Dutch bereaved people and mental health care workers.","authors":"Jip Martijn van Oostrum, Defne Akalin, Lonneke Lenferink","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2026.2663660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Deepfake technology, capable of simulating realistic representations of deceased people, is receiving growing attention as a potential technological tool in grief treatment. While its use has been explored in trauma treatment, its application in grief treatment remains unstudied.<b>Objective:</b> We examined how Dutch bereaved people and mental healthcare workers (MHCWs) perceive the usefulness and risks of using deepfake technology in grief treatment.<b>Method:</b> After viewing a videoclip of a deepfake grief intervention, participants listed three reasons for and against its use. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of open-ended survey responses from 159 bereaved people (86% women, <i>M</i>age = 55.09) and 126 MHCWs (81% women, <i>M</i>age = 39.75).<b>Results:</b> Bereaved people found deepfakes emotionally meaningful, envisioning them as a way to say goodbye, reconnect, or find closure. MHCWs acknowledged therapeutic potential, particularly as a supplement to established techniques (e.g. exposure, imagery rescripting), but highlighted ethical issues regarding misrepresentation, informed consent, and client safety. Both groups raised concerns about psychological risks, including hindrance of loss acceptance and emotional dependency, especially for vulnerable clients.<b>Conclusions:</b> Bereaved people valued opportunities for reconnection with the deceased, while MHCWs warned that such reconnection might impede grief processing. Both groups agreed that deepfakes may have therapeutic value if applied ethically, under therapist guidance, and with safeguards. Because participants were asked about hypothetical use, results reflect perceptions, not clinical effectiveness. Our findings underscore the need for ethical guidelines to balance bereaved people's needs with professional responsibility when exploring the therapeutic effects of deepfake technology in treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"17 1","pages":"2663660"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13215421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2026.2663660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Deepfake technology, capable of simulating realistic representations of deceased people, is receiving growing attention as a potential technological tool in grief treatment. While its use has been explored in trauma treatment, its application in grief treatment remains unstudied.Objective: We examined how Dutch bereaved people and mental healthcare workers (MHCWs) perceive the usefulness and risks of using deepfake technology in grief treatment.Method: After viewing a videoclip of a deepfake grief intervention, participants listed three reasons for and against its use. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of open-ended survey responses from 159 bereaved people (86% women, Mage = 55.09) and 126 MHCWs (81% women, Mage = 39.75).Results: Bereaved people found deepfakes emotionally meaningful, envisioning them as a way to say goodbye, reconnect, or find closure. MHCWs acknowledged therapeutic potential, particularly as a supplement to established techniques (e.g. exposure, imagery rescripting), but highlighted ethical issues regarding misrepresentation, informed consent, and client safety. Both groups raised concerns about psychological risks, including hindrance of loss acceptance and emotional dependency, especially for vulnerable clients.Conclusions: Bereaved people valued opportunities for reconnection with the deceased, while MHCWs warned that such reconnection might impede grief processing. Both groups agreed that deepfakes may have therapeutic value if applied ethically, under therapist guidance, and with safeguards. Because participants were asked about hypothetical use, results reflect perceptions, not clinical effectiveness. Our findings underscore the need for ethical guidelines to balance bereaved people's needs with professional responsibility when exploring the therapeutic effects of deepfake technology in treatment.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.