Lumbar Superior Articular Process-Pedicle Impingement, a Previously Unrecognized Pathological Cause of Low Back Pain: A Case Report.

NMC case report journal Pub Date : 2026-04-27 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2025-0430
Naoto Ono, Masatoshi Morimoto, Takafumi Ohshima, Takayuki Kitahara, Yuji Nagao, Hiroshi Kageyama, Saori Soeda, Daiki Nakajima, Makoto Takeuchi, Hiroaki Manabe, Fumitake Tezuka, Junzo Fujitani, Koichi Sairyo
{"title":"Lumbar Superior Articular Process-Pedicle Impingement, a Previously Unrecognized Pathological Cause of Low Back Pain: A Case Report.","authors":"Naoto Ono, Masatoshi Morimoto, Takafumi Ohshima, Takayuki Kitahara, Yuji Nagao, Hiroshi Kageyama, Saori Soeda, Daiki Nakajima, Makoto Takeuchi, Hiroaki Manabe, Fumitake Tezuka, Junzo Fujitani, Koichi Sairyo","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2025-0430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Superior articular process-pedicle impingement may be an underrecognized mechanical pain generator in posture-dependent axial low back pain. We report a case of a 32-year-old male professional football player who presented with low back pain that was provoked by forward flexion and right lateral bending and was refractory to conservative measures. Radiographs and computed tomography scans showed near-elimination of the osseous interval between the right S1 superior articular process and the caudal aspect of the right L5 pedicle, with reactive cortical change. Targeted infiltration of local anesthetic at the suspected impingement interface produced immediate pain relief, and facet-preserving full-endoscopic bony decompression led to sustained improvement at 3 months. We propose that superior articular process-pedicle impingement should be considered in patients presenting with posture-dependent axial low back pain. The following 3 features serve as a practical diagnostic triad: concordant provocation; radiographic or computed tomographic evidence of superior articular process-pedicle contact or near-contact; and an immediate response to targeted local anesthesia. Facet-preserving full-endoscopic decompression is a reasonable option for refractory cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":101331,"journal":{"name":"NMC case report journal","volume":"13 ","pages":"189-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13198949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMC case report journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2025-0430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Superior articular process-pedicle impingement may be an underrecognized mechanical pain generator in posture-dependent axial low back pain. We report a case of a 32-year-old male professional football player who presented with low back pain that was provoked by forward flexion and right lateral bending and was refractory to conservative measures. Radiographs and computed tomography scans showed near-elimination of the osseous interval between the right S1 superior articular process and the caudal aspect of the right L5 pedicle, with reactive cortical change. Targeted infiltration of local anesthetic at the suspected impingement interface produced immediate pain relief, and facet-preserving full-endoscopic bony decompression led to sustained improvement at 3 months. We propose that superior articular process-pedicle impingement should be considered in patients presenting with posture-dependent axial low back pain. The following 3 features serve as a practical diagnostic triad: concordant provocation; radiographic or computed tomographic evidence of superior articular process-pedicle contact or near-contact; and an immediate response to targeted local anesthesia. Facet-preserving full-endoscopic decompression is a reasonable option for refractory cases.

腰椎上关节突-椎弓根撞击,一种以前未被认识到的腰痛病理原因:一例报告。
上关节突-椎弓根撞击可能是一种未被充分认识的机械性疼痛产生者。我们报告了一个32岁的男性职业足球运动员,他表现出下腰痛,是由前屈和右侧弯曲引起的,对保守措施是难治的。x线片和计算机断层扫描显示右侧S1上关节突和右侧L5椎弓根尾侧之间的骨间隔几乎消失,伴有反应性皮质改变。在疑似撞击界面处有针对性地浸润局麻药可立即缓解疼痛,并在3个月时保持面全内镜下骨减压可持续改善。我们建议在出现姿势依赖性腰背痛的患者中,应考虑上关节突-椎弓根撞击。以下3个特征可作为实用的诊断三联征:和谐激发;上关节突-椎弓根接触或近接触的x线或计算机断层扫描证据;并立即对局部麻醉做出反应。保留关节面的全内镜减压术是难治性病例的合理选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书