Anatomical characteristics of the styloid process associated with internal carotid artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials.
Tomas Klail, Emmanouil Kalioras, Marc von Gernler, Roland Giger, Aristomenis K Exadaktylos, Martin Müller, Franca Wagner
{"title":"Anatomical characteristics of the styloid process associated with internal carotid artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials.","authors":"Tomas Klail, Emmanouil Kalioras, Marc von Gernler, Roland Giger, Aristomenis K Exadaktylos, Martin Müller, Franca Wagner","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2026.1788985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Internal carotid artery dissection (ICA-D) is an important cause of stroke in adults. The styloid process (SP) may be associated with ICA-D due to potential (micro)trauma resulting from its close anatomical proximity to the internal carotid artery (ICA). The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to investigate the association between SP characteristics -particularly SP-ICA distance - and ICA-D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted across six databases to identify observational studies comparing ICA-D patients to controls. The primary outcome of interest was the association between SP-ICA distance and ICA-D. Secondary outcomes included associations between ICA-D and the SP length or angulation. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, including a subgroup analysis of moderate/high-quality studies. Effect sizes were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD, Hedges' g).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included in the systematic review, of which five were eligible in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis of all five case-control studies (270 ICA-D patients and 377 controls) showed no significant difference in SP-ICA distance (SMD = -0.92, <i>p</i> = 0.143); with a high degree of heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 98%). Subgroup analysis of moderate/high-quality studies evaluating the SP-ICA distance ipsilateral to the ICA-D (4 studies) yielded a negative pooled SMD (-0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.047; moderate heterogeneity: I<sup>2</sup> = 64%), consistent with a shorter SP-ICA distance in ICA-D cases. Meta-analysis of the SP length (3 studies) found no significant association (SMD 0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.139) and two studies also found no significant relationship between ICA-D and SP angulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A shorter SP-ICA distance was associated with ICA-D, whereas no significant associations were observed for SP length or angulation. However, the available evidence remains limited and heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>CRD42024582594.</p>","PeriodicalId":73101,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in radiology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1788985"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13191739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2026.1788985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Internal carotid artery dissection (ICA-D) is an important cause of stroke in adults. The styloid process (SP) may be associated with ICA-D due to potential (micro)trauma resulting from its close anatomical proximity to the internal carotid artery (ICA). The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to investigate the association between SP characteristics -particularly SP-ICA distance - and ICA-D.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted across six databases to identify observational studies comparing ICA-D patients to controls. The primary outcome of interest was the association between SP-ICA distance and ICA-D. Secondary outcomes included associations between ICA-D and the SP length or angulation. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, including a subgroup analysis of moderate/high-quality studies. Effect sizes were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD, Hedges' g).
Results: Six studies were included in the systematic review, of which five were eligible in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis of all five case-control studies (270 ICA-D patients and 377 controls) showed no significant difference in SP-ICA distance (SMD = -0.92, p = 0.143); with a high degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 98%). Subgroup analysis of moderate/high-quality studies evaluating the SP-ICA distance ipsilateral to the ICA-D (4 studies) yielded a negative pooled SMD (-0.29, p = 0.047; moderate heterogeneity: I2 = 64%), consistent with a shorter SP-ICA distance in ICA-D cases. Meta-analysis of the SP length (3 studies) found no significant association (SMD 0.24, p = 0.139) and two studies also found no significant relationship between ICA-D and SP angulation.
Conclusion: A shorter SP-ICA distance was associated with ICA-D, whereas no significant associations were observed for SP length or angulation. However, the available evidence remains limited and heterogeneous.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
