Investigating biotypes and neural characteristics among anxiety, depression, and comorbidity via a novel noisy label learning method.

IF 7.4
Psychoradiology Pub Date : 2026-04-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/psyrad/kkag014
Yuhui Du, Wei Huang, Yulong Wang, Vince D Calhoun
{"title":"Investigating biotypes and neural characteristics among anxiety, depression, and comorbidity via a novel noisy label learning method.","authors":"Yuhui Du, Wei Huang, Yulong Wang, Vince D Calhoun","doi":"10.1093/psyrad/kkag014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety and depression share many symptoms, frequently leading to diagnostic uncertainty. They are also the most common co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Standard clinical evaluations typically diagnose each condition categorically rather than assessing their relative severity when both are present. Prior imaging studies largely concentrated on delineating similarities and distinctions between the two.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this gap, we propose a novel noisy label learning method to investigate the biotypes and relevant neural characteristics among anxiety, depression, and their comorbidity. Our approach constructs a robust classification model to address potential diagnostic confusion among anxiety, depression, and comorbidity using a noisy label learning strategy, and employs the trained model to identify the anxiety and depression biotypes, as well as comorbidity biotypes characterized by differing degrees of anxiety and depression predominance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using brain functional network connectivity (FNC) from 502 depression patients, 245 anxiety patients, 177 comorbid patients with both anxiety and depression, and 500 healthy controls, we not only identify four distinct biotypes, but also reveal neural linkages between comorbid biotypes and depression and anxiety biotypes. Compared to the depression biotype (Biotype 1), the anxiety biotype (Biotype 2), and the comorbid biotype with an anxiety predominance (Biotype 3-2) demonstrate comparable alterations across seven FNCs, mainly including the connections between the cognitive control and visual domains. Relative to the anxiety biotype (Biotype 2), the depression biotype (Biotype 1), and the comorbid biotype with a depression predominance (Biotype 3-1) exhibit similar connectivity profiles across 16 FNCs, primarily involving connections within the cognitive control domain, as well as between the sensorimotor and visual domains. Furthermore, biotypes are characterized by distinct patterns of behavioral symptoms that are consistent with their underlying neural relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, we propose a neuroimage-based model that addresses the diagnostic ambiguity between anxiety and depression and derive data-driven subtypes for promoting the precise diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93496,"journal":{"name":"Psychoradiology","volume":"6 ","pages":"kkag014"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13192247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/psyrad/kkag014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anxiety and depression share many symptoms, frequently leading to diagnostic uncertainty. They are also the most common co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Standard clinical evaluations typically diagnose each condition categorically rather than assessing their relative severity when both are present. Prior imaging studies largely concentrated on delineating similarities and distinctions between the two.

Methods: To address this gap, we propose a novel noisy label learning method to investigate the biotypes and relevant neural characteristics among anxiety, depression, and their comorbidity. Our approach constructs a robust classification model to address potential diagnostic confusion among anxiety, depression, and comorbidity using a noisy label learning strategy, and employs the trained model to identify the anxiety and depression biotypes, as well as comorbidity biotypes characterized by differing degrees of anxiety and depression predominance.

Results: Using brain functional network connectivity (FNC) from 502 depression patients, 245 anxiety patients, 177 comorbid patients with both anxiety and depression, and 500 healthy controls, we not only identify four distinct biotypes, but also reveal neural linkages between comorbid biotypes and depression and anxiety biotypes. Compared to the depression biotype (Biotype 1), the anxiety biotype (Biotype 2), and the comorbid biotype with an anxiety predominance (Biotype 3-2) demonstrate comparable alterations across seven FNCs, mainly including the connections between the cognitive control and visual domains. Relative to the anxiety biotype (Biotype 2), the depression biotype (Biotype 1), and the comorbid biotype with a depression predominance (Biotype 3-1) exhibit similar connectivity profiles across 16 FNCs, primarily involving connections within the cognitive control domain, as well as between the sensorimotor and visual domains. Furthermore, biotypes are characterized by distinct patterns of behavioral symptoms that are consistent with their underlying neural relationships.

Conclusions: In summary, we propose a neuroimage-based model that addresses the diagnostic ambiguity between anxiety and depression and derive data-driven subtypes for promoting the precise diagnosis.

通过一种新的噪声标签学习方法研究焦虑、抑郁和共病的生物类型和神经特征。
背景:焦虑和抑郁有许多共同的症状,经常导致诊断的不确定性。它们也是最常见的同时发生的精神疾病。标准的临床评估通常是对每种情况进行分类诊断,而不是在两种情况都存在时评估它们的相对严重程度。先前的影像学研究主要集中在描述两者之间的相似之处和区别。方法:为了弥补这一空白,我们提出了一种新的噪声标签学习方法来研究焦虑、抑郁及其合并症的生物类型和相关神经特征。我们的方法构建了一个稳健的分类模型,以解决焦虑、抑郁和共病之间潜在的诊断混淆,并使用训练后的模型来识别焦虑和抑郁生物型,以及不同程度的焦虑和抑郁优势特征的共病生物型。结果:利用502例抑郁症患者、245例焦虑患者、177例焦虑抑郁共患病患者和500名健康对照者的脑功能网络连接(FNC),我们不仅确定了4种不同的生物型,而且揭示了共患病生物型与抑郁和焦虑生物型之间的神经联系。与抑郁生物型(生物型1)相比,焦虑生物型(生物型2)和伴焦虑显性的共病生物型(生物型3-2)在7种fnc中表现出可比性的变化,主要包括认知控制和视觉域之间的联系。相对于焦虑生物型(生物型2),抑郁生物型(生物型1)和抑郁优势共病生物型(生物型3-1)在16个fnc中表现出相似的连接概况,主要涉及认知控制域内的连接,以及感觉运动和视觉域之间的连接。此外,生物型的特点是行为症状的不同模式与其潜在的神经关系相一致。结论:总之,我们提出了一个基于神经图像的模型,该模型解决了焦虑和抑郁之间的诊断歧义,并派生了数据驱动的亚型,以促进准确的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书