Clinical evaluation of corneal elasticity and true IOP using a dual-applanation tonometer.

IF 2.4
Frontiers in ophthalmology Pub Date : 2026-05-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fopht.2026.1811004
Ciro Caruso, Gaetano Barbaro, Mario Troisi, Francesco Matarazzo, Ciro Costagliola
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of corneal elasticity and true IOP using a dual-applanation tonometer.","authors":"Ciro Caruso, Gaetano Barbaro, Mario Troisi, Francesco Matarazzo, Ciro Costagliola","doi":"10.3389/fopht.2026.1811004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical feasibility of a modified Goldmann applanation system capable of estimating true intraocular pressure and corneal elasticity <i>in vivo</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dual-applanation prism was developed, allowing two sequential IOP readings under identical optical conditions. A mathematical model was applied to compute true intraocular pressure and the corneal Young's modulus measured applanation forces, corneal thickness and curvature. Fifty-three healthy eyes were examined. Model-derived true intraocular pressure values were compared with standard GAT, Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and corneal Young's modulus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean IOPT was 15.72 ± 2.44 mmHg, significantly higher than GAT measurements (14.86 ± 2.71 mmHg; mean difference +0.86 ± 1.82 mmHg, p = 0.0012). IOPT showed strong agreement with Pascal DCT (15.60 ± 2.35 mmHg), with minimal bias (+0.15 ± 1.63 mmHg, p = 0.499) and high correlation (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001). Measurement variance was lower for IOPT than for GAT, indicating improved precision. The mean <i>in vivo</i> corneal Young's modulus was 0.18 ± 0.04 MPa (range 0.057 MPa to 0.296 MPa.), consistent with physiological values. Young's modulus showed significant age-related variation (p < 0.001) and a moderate inverse correlation with IOPT (r = -0.53, p < 0.001), while no significant sex-related differences were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This dual-applanation system enables real-time <i>in vivo</i> estimation of both true intraocular pressure and corneal elasticity. The model provides a physically grounded correction to Goldmann tonometry and introduces a new clinically accessible method to assess corneal biomechanics.</p>","PeriodicalId":73096,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1811004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13193895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2026.1811004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical feasibility of a modified Goldmann applanation system capable of estimating true intraocular pressure and corneal elasticity in vivo.

Methods: A dual-applanation prism was developed, allowing two sequential IOP readings under identical optical conditions. A mathematical model was applied to compute true intraocular pressure and the corneal Young's modulus measured applanation forces, corneal thickness and curvature. Fifty-three healthy eyes were examined. Model-derived true intraocular pressure values were compared with standard GAT, Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and corneal Young's modulus.

Results: Mean IOPT was 15.72 ± 2.44 mmHg, significantly higher than GAT measurements (14.86 ± 2.71 mmHg; mean difference +0.86 ± 1.82 mmHg, p = 0.0012). IOPT showed strong agreement with Pascal DCT (15.60 ± 2.35 mmHg), with minimal bias (+0.15 ± 1.63 mmHg, p = 0.499) and high correlation (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001). Measurement variance was lower for IOPT than for GAT, indicating improved precision. The mean in vivo corneal Young's modulus was 0.18 ± 0.04 MPa (range 0.057 MPa to 0.296 MPa.), consistent with physiological values. Young's modulus showed significant age-related variation (p < 0.001) and a moderate inverse correlation with IOPT (r = -0.53, p < 0.001), while no significant sex-related differences were observed.

Conclusion: This dual-applanation system enables real-time in vivo estimation of both true intraocular pressure and corneal elasticity. The model provides a physically grounded correction to Goldmann tonometry and introduces a new clinically accessible method to assess corneal biomechanics.

双压眼压计对角膜弹性和真IOP的临床评价。
目的:评价改良Goldmann眼压测量系统在体内真实眼压和角膜弹性的临床可行性。方法:采用双压平棱镜,在相同的光学条件下进行两次连续IOP读数。应用数学模型计算真实眼压和角膜杨氏模量,测量压平力、角膜厚度和曲率。检查了53只健康的眼睛。将模型得出的真实眼压值与标准GAT、Pascal动态轮廓眼压测量和角膜杨氏模量进行比较。结果:平均IOPT为15.72±2.44 mmHg,显著高于GAT测量值(14.86±2.71 mmHg;平均差值+0.86±1.82 mmHg, p = 0.0012)。IOPT与Pascal DCT(15.60±2.35 mmHg)吻合较好,偏差较小(+0.15±1.63 mmHg, p = 0.499),相关性较高(r = 0.93, p < 0.0001)。IOPT的测量方差低于GAT,表明精度提高。体内角膜杨氏模量平均值为0.18±0.04 MPa(范围为0.057 MPa ~ 0.296 MPa),与生理值一致。杨氏模量显示出显著的年龄相关变化(p < 0.001),与IOPT呈中度负相关(r = -0.53, p < 0.001),而没有观察到显著的性别相关差异。结论:这种双压平系统可以实时评估真实眼压和角膜弹性。该模型为Goldmann血压计提供了物理上的校正,并引入了一种新的临床方法来评估角膜生物力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书