Ciro Caruso, Gaetano Barbaro, Mario Troisi, Francesco Matarazzo, Ciro Costagliola
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of corneal elasticity and true IOP using a dual-applanation tonometer.","authors":"Ciro Caruso, Gaetano Barbaro, Mario Troisi, Francesco Matarazzo, Ciro Costagliola","doi":"10.3389/fopht.2026.1811004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical feasibility of a modified Goldmann applanation system capable of estimating true intraocular pressure and corneal elasticity <i>in vivo</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dual-applanation prism was developed, allowing two sequential IOP readings under identical optical conditions. A mathematical model was applied to compute true intraocular pressure and the corneal Young's modulus measured applanation forces, corneal thickness and curvature. Fifty-three healthy eyes were examined. Model-derived true intraocular pressure values were compared with standard GAT, Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and corneal Young's modulus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean IOPT was 15.72 ± 2.44 mmHg, significantly higher than GAT measurements (14.86 ± 2.71 mmHg; mean difference +0.86 ± 1.82 mmHg, p = 0.0012). IOPT showed strong agreement with Pascal DCT (15.60 ± 2.35 mmHg), with minimal bias (+0.15 ± 1.63 mmHg, p = 0.499) and high correlation (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001). Measurement variance was lower for IOPT than for GAT, indicating improved precision. The mean <i>in vivo</i> corneal Young's modulus was 0.18 ± 0.04 MPa (range 0.057 MPa to 0.296 MPa.), consistent with physiological values. Young's modulus showed significant age-related variation (p < 0.001) and a moderate inverse correlation with IOPT (r = -0.53, p < 0.001), while no significant sex-related differences were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This dual-applanation system enables real-time <i>in vivo</i> estimation of both true intraocular pressure and corneal elasticity. The model provides a physically grounded correction to Goldmann tonometry and introduces a new clinically accessible method to assess corneal biomechanics.</p>","PeriodicalId":73096,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1811004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13193895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2026.1811004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical feasibility of a modified Goldmann applanation system capable of estimating true intraocular pressure and corneal elasticity in vivo.
Methods: A dual-applanation prism was developed, allowing two sequential IOP readings under identical optical conditions. A mathematical model was applied to compute true intraocular pressure and the corneal Young's modulus measured applanation forces, corneal thickness and curvature. Fifty-three healthy eyes were examined. Model-derived true intraocular pressure values were compared with standard GAT, Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and corneal Young's modulus.
Results: Mean IOPT was 15.72 ± 2.44 mmHg, significantly higher than GAT measurements (14.86 ± 2.71 mmHg; mean difference +0.86 ± 1.82 mmHg, p = 0.0012). IOPT showed strong agreement with Pascal DCT (15.60 ± 2.35 mmHg), with minimal bias (+0.15 ± 1.63 mmHg, p = 0.499) and high correlation (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001). Measurement variance was lower for IOPT than for GAT, indicating improved precision. The mean in vivo corneal Young's modulus was 0.18 ± 0.04 MPa (range 0.057 MPa to 0.296 MPa.), consistent with physiological values. Young's modulus showed significant age-related variation (p < 0.001) and a moderate inverse correlation with IOPT (r = -0.53, p < 0.001), while no significant sex-related differences were observed.
Conclusion: This dual-applanation system enables real-time in vivo estimation of both true intraocular pressure and corneal elasticity. The model provides a physically grounded correction to Goldmann tonometry and introduces a new clinically accessible method to assess corneal biomechanics.