Developing and validating an artificial intelligence-based electronic triage model for predicting clinical outcomes among cardiac-suspected patients in the emergency department.

IF 4.4 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2026-05-22 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztag023
Ahmad Bavali-Gazik, Elahe Allahyari, Amir Sezavar, Seyed Ali Moezi-Bady, Seyyed Abolfazl Vagharseyyedin
{"title":"Developing and validating an artificial intelligence-based electronic triage model for predicting clinical outcomes among cardiac-suspected patients in the emergency department.","authors":"Ahmad Bavali-Gazik, Elahe Allahyari, Amir Sezavar, Seyed Ali Moezi-Bady, Seyyed Abolfazl Vagharseyyedin","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztag023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Emergency department overcrowding, especially in cardiac units, delays care and raises mortality. Conventional triage is error-prone. We developed an AI-based model integrating routine data and automated ECGs to improve early risk classification.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study involved 600 medical records of patients presenting with suspected cardiac symptoms. Model development was conducted in three phases: Designing a triage model using routine triage data, designing a triage model based on ECG images, and combining the ECG-based model and triage data. Model performance was evaluated regarding standard clinical outcomes within the first 24 h and compared against the Emergency Severity Index. The best-performing model based on triage data alone (i.e. multilayer perceptron neural network) yielded an accuracy of 89.42%, <i>F</i>-score of 84.51, and area under the curve between 0.815 and 0.858. The best-performing model based on ECG interpretation alone (i.e. convolutional neural network) yielded an accuracy of 93.83%, <i>F</i>-score of 91.08, and area under the curve ranging from 0.852 to 0.914. The fusion model demonstrated superior performance, with an accuracy of 97.22%, <i>F</i>-score of 94.60, and area under the curve between 0.881 and 0.938-significantly outperforming the conventional Emergency Severity Index. In the fusion model, the key predictive variables included ECG interpretation, heart rate, and mode of entry to emergency department.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given its advantages over models using only routine data, ECG, or conventional triage, the fused AI-based triage model may effectively prioritize and predict cardiac emergency outcomes, providing a foundation for developing reliable, intelligent support systems in acute care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"7 5","pages":"ztag023"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13195029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztag023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Emergency department overcrowding, especially in cardiac units, delays care and raises mortality. Conventional triage is error-prone. We developed an AI-based model integrating routine data and automated ECGs to improve early risk classification.

Methods and results: This retrospective cross-sectional study involved 600 medical records of patients presenting with suspected cardiac symptoms. Model development was conducted in three phases: Designing a triage model using routine triage data, designing a triage model based on ECG images, and combining the ECG-based model and triage data. Model performance was evaluated regarding standard clinical outcomes within the first 24 h and compared against the Emergency Severity Index. The best-performing model based on triage data alone (i.e. multilayer perceptron neural network) yielded an accuracy of 89.42%, F-score of 84.51, and area under the curve between 0.815 and 0.858. The best-performing model based on ECG interpretation alone (i.e. convolutional neural network) yielded an accuracy of 93.83%, F-score of 91.08, and area under the curve ranging from 0.852 to 0.914. The fusion model demonstrated superior performance, with an accuracy of 97.22%, F-score of 94.60, and area under the curve between 0.881 and 0.938-significantly outperforming the conventional Emergency Severity Index. In the fusion model, the key predictive variables included ECG interpretation, heart rate, and mode of entry to emergency department.

Conclusion: Given its advantages over models using only routine data, ECG, or conventional triage, the fused AI-based triage model may effectively prioritize and predict cardiac emergency outcomes, providing a foundation for developing reliable, intelligent support systems in acute care.

开发和验证基于人工智能的电子分诊模型,用于预测急诊科心脏病疑似患者的临床结果。
目的:急诊科过度拥挤,特别是心脏科,延误护理,提高死亡率。传统的分诊很容易出错。我们开发了一种基于人工智能的模型,集成了常规数据和自动心电图,以提高早期风险分类。方法和结果:本回顾性横断面研究涉及600例疑似心脏症状患者的医疗记录。模型开发分为三个阶段:利用常规分诊数据设计分诊模型,基于心电图像设计分诊模型,以及将基于心电图的模型与分诊数据相结合。根据前24小时内的标准临床结果评估模型性能,并与紧急严重程度指数进行比较。仅基于分诊数据的最佳模型(即多层感知器神经网络)的准确率为89.42%,f值为84.51,曲线下面积在0.815 ~ 0.858之间。仅基于心电解释的最佳模型(即卷积神经网络)准确率为93.83%,f值为91.08,曲线下面积范围为0.852 ~ 0.914。融合模型的准确率为97.22%,f值为94.60,曲线下面积在0.881 ~ 0.938之间,显著优于传统的紧急程度指数。在融合模型中,关键的预测变量包括心电图解释、心率和进入急诊室的方式。结论:与仅使用常规数据、ECG或常规分诊的模型相比,基于人工智能的融合分诊模型具有优势,可以有效地优先考虑和预测心脏急诊结果,为开发可靠、智能的急性护理支持系统提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书