Developing and validating an artificial intelligence-based electronic triage model for predicting clinical outcomes among cardiac-suspected patients in the emergency department.
Ahmad Bavali-Gazik, Elahe Allahyari, Amir Sezavar, Seyed Ali Moezi-Bady, Seyyed Abolfazl Vagharseyyedin
{"title":"Developing and validating an artificial intelligence-based electronic triage model for predicting clinical outcomes among cardiac-suspected patients in the emergency department.","authors":"Ahmad Bavali-Gazik, Elahe Allahyari, Amir Sezavar, Seyed Ali Moezi-Bady, Seyyed Abolfazl Vagharseyyedin","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztag023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Emergency department overcrowding, especially in cardiac units, delays care and raises mortality. Conventional triage is error-prone. We developed an AI-based model integrating routine data and automated ECGs to improve early risk classification.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study involved 600 medical records of patients presenting with suspected cardiac symptoms. Model development was conducted in three phases: Designing a triage model using routine triage data, designing a triage model based on ECG images, and combining the ECG-based model and triage data. Model performance was evaluated regarding standard clinical outcomes within the first 24 h and compared against the Emergency Severity Index. The best-performing model based on triage data alone (i.e. multilayer perceptron neural network) yielded an accuracy of 89.42%, <i>F</i>-score of 84.51, and area under the curve between 0.815 and 0.858. The best-performing model based on ECG interpretation alone (i.e. convolutional neural network) yielded an accuracy of 93.83%, <i>F</i>-score of 91.08, and area under the curve ranging from 0.852 to 0.914. The fusion model demonstrated superior performance, with an accuracy of 97.22%, <i>F</i>-score of 94.60, and area under the curve between 0.881 and 0.938-significantly outperforming the conventional Emergency Severity Index. In the fusion model, the key predictive variables included ECG interpretation, heart rate, and mode of entry to emergency department.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given its advantages over models using only routine data, ECG, or conventional triage, the fused AI-based triage model may effectively prioritize and predict cardiac emergency outcomes, providing a foundation for developing reliable, intelligent support systems in acute care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"7 5","pages":"ztag023"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13195029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztag023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Emergency department overcrowding, especially in cardiac units, delays care and raises mortality. Conventional triage is error-prone. We developed an AI-based model integrating routine data and automated ECGs to improve early risk classification.
Methods and results: This retrospective cross-sectional study involved 600 medical records of patients presenting with suspected cardiac symptoms. Model development was conducted in three phases: Designing a triage model using routine triage data, designing a triage model based on ECG images, and combining the ECG-based model and triage data. Model performance was evaluated regarding standard clinical outcomes within the first 24 h and compared against the Emergency Severity Index. The best-performing model based on triage data alone (i.e. multilayer perceptron neural network) yielded an accuracy of 89.42%, F-score of 84.51, and area under the curve between 0.815 and 0.858. The best-performing model based on ECG interpretation alone (i.e. convolutional neural network) yielded an accuracy of 93.83%, F-score of 91.08, and area under the curve ranging from 0.852 to 0.914. The fusion model demonstrated superior performance, with an accuracy of 97.22%, F-score of 94.60, and area under the curve between 0.881 and 0.938-significantly outperforming the conventional Emergency Severity Index. In the fusion model, the key predictive variables included ECG interpretation, heart rate, and mode of entry to emergency department.
Conclusion: Given its advantages over models using only routine data, ECG, or conventional triage, the fused AI-based triage model may effectively prioritize and predict cardiac emergency outcomes, providing a foundation for developing reliable, intelligent support systems in acute care.