Living with what is lost: reframing emotional life with diabetes through an integrative perspective on loss and grief.

IF 3.5
Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare Pub Date : 2026-05-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcdhc.2026.1771568
Bryan Cleal, Linxi Mytkolli, Kristoffer Bastrup-Madsen Marså, Mette Due-Christensen, Dan Grabowski, Jonathan Garfinkel, Carlo Leget, Mai-Britt Guldin
{"title":"Living with what is lost: reframing emotional life with diabetes through an integrative perspective on loss and grief.","authors":"Bryan Cleal, Linxi Mytkolli, Kristoffer Bastrup-Madsen Marså, Mette Due-Christensen, Dan Grabowski, Jonathan Garfinkel, Carlo Leget, Mai-Britt Guldin","doi":"10.3389/fcdhc.2026.1771568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past three decades, the concept of diabetes distress has played a central role in legitimising the emotional burdens of living with diabetes without pathologising them. Diabetes distress has helped foreground the frustrations, worries, and exhaustion associated with the ongoing demands of self-management and interactions with healthcare systems, and it has provided an important counterweight to purely biomedical models of care. However, while clinically useful, diabetes distress primarily captures emotional responses linked to burden, effort, and perceived threat. It may not fully encompass the quieter, cumulative, and more existential dimensions of emotional life that unfold across the long course of living with diabetes. In this conceptual article, we introduce loss and grief as a complementary lens for understanding these aspects of experience. Drawing on the Integrative Process Model of Loss and Grief (IPM), originally developed within bereavement research, we explore how living with diabetes involves ongoing and often ambiguous losses that affect bodily trust, identity, social participation, imagined futures, and meaning. The IPM conceptualises grief as a dynamic, integrative process unfolding across five interrelated dimensions: physical, emotional, cognitive, social, and spiritual. Rather than treating grief as a time-limited response to a discrete event, the model emphasises adaptation to cumulative and enduring forms of loss, making it particularly relevant to chronic illness. We do not propose grief as an alternative to diabetes distress. Instead, we argue that distress and grief represent overlapping but distinct perspectives on the same lived reality. Diabetes distress foregrounds the pressures and emotional load of self-management, while a grief-informed perspective highlights processes of adaptation, meaning-making, and identity renegotiation over time. Placing these perspectives together allows for a more textured understanding of emotional life with diabetes, including experiences that may not register in screening tools or routine clinical encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":73075,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","volume":"7 ","pages":"1771568"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13193959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2026.1771568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past three decades, the concept of diabetes distress has played a central role in legitimising the emotional burdens of living with diabetes without pathologising them. Diabetes distress has helped foreground the frustrations, worries, and exhaustion associated with the ongoing demands of self-management and interactions with healthcare systems, and it has provided an important counterweight to purely biomedical models of care. However, while clinically useful, diabetes distress primarily captures emotional responses linked to burden, effort, and perceived threat. It may not fully encompass the quieter, cumulative, and more existential dimensions of emotional life that unfold across the long course of living with diabetes. In this conceptual article, we introduce loss and grief as a complementary lens for understanding these aspects of experience. Drawing on the Integrative Process Model of Loss and Grief (IPM), originally developed within bereavement research, we explore how living with diabetes involves ongoing and often ambiguous losses that affect bodily trust, identity, social participation, imagined futures, and meaning. The IPM conceptualises grief as a dynamic, integrative process unfolding across five interrelated dimensions: physical, emotional, cognitive, social, and spiritual. Rather than treating grief as a time-limited response to a discrete event, the model emphasises adaptation to cumulative and enduring forms of loss, making it particularly relevant to chronic illness. We do not propose grief as an alternative to diabetes distress. Instead, we argue that distress and grief represent overlapping but distinct perspectives on the same lived reality. Diabetes distress foregrounds the pressures and emotional load of self-management, while a grief-informed perspective highlights processes of adaptation, meaning-making, and identity renegotiation over time. Placing these perspectives together allows for a more textured understanding of emotional life with diabetes, including experiences that may not register in screening tools or routine clinical encounters.

与失去的生活在一起:通过对失去和悲伤的综合视角重新构建糖尿病患者的情感生活。
在过去的三十年里,糖尿病痛苦的概念在使糖尿病患者的情感负担合法化而不将其病态化方面发挥了核心作用。糖尿病困扰有助于突出与自我管理和与医疗保健系统互动的持续需求相关的挫折,担忧和疲惫,并且它为纯粹的生物医学护理模式提供了重要的平衡。然而,尽管临床上有用,糖尿病痛苦主要捕获与负担、努力和感知威胁相关的情绪反应。它可能没有完全涵盖在糖尿病患者长期生活过程中展开的更安静、累积和更存在的情感生活维度。在这篇概念性的文章中,我们介绍了失去和悲伤作为理解这些方面的经验的补充镜头。借鉴最初在丧亲研究中开发的损失和悲伤的综合过程模型(IPM),我们探讨了糖尿病患者如何涉及持续的和经常模糊的损失,这些损失会影响身体的信任、身份、社会参与、想象的未来和意义。IPM将悲伤定义为一个动态的、综合的过程,在五个相互关联的维度上展开:身体、情感、认知、社会和精神。该模型不是将悲伤视为对离散事件的有限时间反应,而是强调对累积和持久形式的损失的适应,使其与慢性疾病特别相关。我们不建议悲伤作为糖尿病痛苦的替代品。相反,我们认为痛苦和悲伤代表了对同一生活现实的重叠但不同的观点。糖尿病痛苦强调了自我管理的压力和情绪负荷,而悲伤知情的观点则强调了随着时间的推移适应、意义创造和身份重新谈判的过程。将这些观点结合在一起,可以更有条理地理解糖尿病患者的情感生活,包括在筛查工具或常规临床遭遇中可能没有记录的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书