Jack Manners, Hannah Scott, Alisha Guyett, Nicole Stuart, Peter Catcheside, Eva Kemps
{"title":"Estimated sleep from an under-mattress device predicts next-day vigilance, working memory, and mental arithmetic performance.","authors":"Jack Manners, Hannah Scott, Alisha Guyett, Nicole Stuart, Peter Catcheside, Eva Kemps","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpag045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Sleep is vitally important to maintain cognitive function, particularly in shift-work contexts. Sleep trackers can reliably estimate sleep, but the relationship between estimated sleep and specific cognitive domains is unclear. This study examined associations between estimated sleep and subsequent cognitive performance during a simulated night-shift protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four participants (mean [<i>SD</i>] age = 28[9] years) attended the sleep laboratory twice, for an 8-day simulated shift-work experimental protocol under two lighting conditions (standard- vs. circadian-informed lighting). Following a baseline sleep, participants remained awake for 27 h and transitioned to sleeping between 10:00 and 19:00 with cognitive testing between 00:00 and 08:00 for four days. Tests included the Balloon Analogue Risk Task, Continuous Performance task, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Iowa Gambling task, Operation-Span task, Psychomotor Vigilance test, Stroop task, Tower of London task, and Trail Making test. Sleep was assessed using an under-mattress sensor (Withings Sleep Analyzer). Linear and non-linear models were used to test associations between estimated sleep and cognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant associations were found between sleep metrics and PVT reaction time (R<sup>2</sup> = .13, <i>p</i> = .008), Operation-Span arithmetic errors (.15, <i>p</i> = .023), proportion correct on DSST and Stroop tasks (.06, <i>p</i> = .045; .09, <i>p</i> = .003), and Stroop reaction time (.19, <i>p</i> = .004). Random forest models demonstrated that vigilance, working memory, and mental arithmetic were associated with estimated sleep architecture, snoring, and cardiovascular function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sleep trackers could inform next-day cognitive performance, particularly vigilance, mental arithmetic, and working memory. In so doing, they may enable more informed interpretations of device-derived sleep and management of sleep-related cognitive impairment in future models. <i>This paper is part of the Consumer Sleep Technology Collection</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":74808,"journal":{"name":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","volume":"7 2","pages":"zpag045"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13198724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpag045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objectives: Sleep is vitally important to maintain cognitive function, particularly in shift-work contexts. Sleep trackers can reliably estimate sleep, but the relationship between estimated sleep and specific cognitive domains is unclear. This study examined associations between estimated sleep and subsequent cognitive performance during a simulated night-shift protocol.
Methods: Twenty-four participants (mean [SD] age = 28[9] years) attended the sleep laboratory twice, for an 8-day simulated shift-work experimental protocol under two lighting conditions (standard- vs. circadian-informed lighting). Following a baseline sleep, participants remained awake for 27 h and transitioned to sleeping between 10:00 and 19:00 with cognitive testing between 00:00 and 08:00 for four days. Tests included the Balloon Analogue Risk Task, Continuous Performance task, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Iowa Gambling task, Operation-Span task, Psychomotor Vigilance test, Stroop task, Tower of London task, and Trail Making test. Sleep was assessed using an under-mattress sensor (Withings Sleep Analyzer). Linear and non-linear models were used to test associations between estimated sleep and cognitive performance.
Results: Significant associations were found between sleep metrics and PVT reaction time (R2 = .13, p = .008), Operation-Span arithmetic errors (.15, p = .023), proportion correct on DSST and Stroop tasks (.06, p = .045; .09, p = .003), and Stroop reaction time (.19, p = .004). Random forest models demonstrated that vigilance, working memory, and mental arithmetic were associated with estimated sleep architecture, snoring, and cardiovascular function.
Conclusions: Sleep trackers could inform next-day cognitive performance, particularly vigilance, mental arithmetic, and working memory. In so doing, they may enable more informed interpretations of device-derived sleep and management of sleep-related cognitive impairment in future models. This paper is part of the Consumer Sleep Technology Collection.
研究目标:睡眠对维持认知功能至关重要,尤其是在轮班工作的情况下。睡眠追踪器可以可靠地估计睡眠,但估计睡眠与特定认知领域之间的关系尚不清楚。这项研究调查了在模拟夜班协议中估计睡眠和随后的认知表现之间的关系。方法:24名参与者(平均[SD]年龄= 28岁)参加了两次睡眠实验室,在两种照明条件下(标准照明与昼夜节律照明)进行了为期8天的模拟倒班工作实验方案。在基线睡眠后,参与者保持清醒27小时,然后在10:00至19:00之间过渡到睡眠状态,并在00:00至08:00之间进行为期四天的认知测试。测试包括气球模拟风险任务、连续表现任务、数字符号替代测试、爱荷华赌博任务、操作跨度任务、精神运动警惕性测试、Stroop任务、伦敦塔任务和造迹测试。使用床垫下传感器(Withings睡眠分析仪)评估睡眠。线性和非线性模型被用来测试估计睡眠和认知表现之间的关系。结果:睡眠指标与PVT反应时间之间存在显著相关性(R2 =。13, p = .008), Operation-Span算术误差(。15, p = 0.023), DSST和Stroop任务的比例正确率(。06, p = 0.045;.9, p = .003), Stroop反应时间(p = .003)。19, p = .004)。随机森林模型表明,警惕性、工作记忆和心算与估计的睡眠结构、打鼾和心血管功能有关。结论:睡眠追踪器可以告知第二天的认知表现,特别是警觉性、心算和工作记忆。在这样做的过程中,他们可能会在未来的模型中对设备衍生睡眠和睡眠相关认知障碍的管理做出更明智的解释。这篇论文是《消费者睡眠技术合集》的一部分。