Wetland landscape transformation by beavers: responses of biodiversity and functional indicators at multiple scales.

IF 4.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Landscape Ecology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s10980-026-02303-4
Alan Law, Nigel J Willby, Tom Spencer, David Bryan, Garth N Foster, Lori Lawson Handley, Wenfei Liao, Graham S Sellers, Petri Nummi
{"title":"Wetland landscape transformation by beavers: responses of biodiversity and functional indicators at multiple scales.","authors":"Alan Law, Nigel J Willby, Tom Spencer, David Bryan, Garth N Foster, Lori Lawson Handley, Wenfei Liao, Graham S Sellers, Petri Nummi","doi":"10.1007/s10980-026-02303-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Landscape-scale restoration is needed to reverse declines in biodiversity, but the ecological processes that sustain biodiversity by boosting heterogeneity are often overlooked. Large herbivores are important drivers of heterogeneity and are increasingly being used to restore lost dynamic processes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>With beaver populations recovering from a historic low, we test what their ecosystem engineering potential means for biodiversity and ecosystem functioning at multiple scales.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We quantified 10 taxonomic groups at sample, site and landscape scale via in-situ surveys (plants and water beetles) and eDNA sampling (invertebrate and vertebrates) from nine beaver-created wetlands and nine wetlands unmodified by beavers (control wetlands) in Evo, Finland.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Per taxonomic group, the mean and total number of taxa at sample and site-scale was mostly similar between wetland types, though significantly higher in beaver wetlands at sample (true flies) and site-scale (plants and true flies). 63% of all taxa were shared by beaver-created and control wetlands. However, both wetland types supported unique taxa with beaver wetlands increasing the landscape taxon pool by an average of 19% (range 0-40%), most notably for plants, beetles, true flies and may/stone/caddisflies. Plant functional diversity was 55% higher in beaver compared to control wetlands.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Beaver wetlands are integral to reinstating dynamic ecological processes that provide refugia for multiple taxonomic groups, supporting taxa otherwise absent from the landscape. Our findings hint at the scale of past biodiversity loss associated with beaver-dependent wetlands, while offering a glimpse of what could be gained from their ongoing population recovery.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10980-026-02303-4.</p>","PeriodicalId":54745,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Ecology","volume":"41 6","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13190757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-026-02303-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Landscape-scale restoration is needed to reverse declines in biodiversity, but the ecological processes that sustain biodiversity by boosting heterogeneity are often overlooked. Large herbivores are important drivers of heterogeneity and are increasingly being used to restore lost dynamic processes.

Objectives: With beaver populations recovering from a historic low, we test what their ecosystem engineering potential means for biodiversity and ecosystem functioning at multiple scales.

Methods: We quantified 10 taxonomic groups at sample, site and landscape scale via in-situ surveys (plants and water beetles) and eDNA sampling (invertebrate and vertebrates) from nine beaver-created wetlands and nine wetlands unmodified by beavers (control wetlands) in Evo, Finland.

Results: Per taxonomic group, the mean and total number of taxa at sample and site-scale was mostly similar between wetland types, though significantly higher in beaver wetlands at sample (true flies) and site-scale (plants and true flies). 63% of all taxa were shared by beaver-created and control wetlands. However, both wetland types supported unique taxa with beaver wetlands increasing the landscape taxon pool by an average of 19% (range 0-40%), most notably for plants, beetles, true flies and may/stone/caddisflies. Plant functional diversity was 55% higher in beaver compared to control wetlands.

Conclusions: Beaver wetlands are integral to reinstating dynamic ecological processes that provide refugia for multiple taxonomic groups, supporting taxa otherwise absent from the landscape. Our findings hint at the scale of past biodiversity loss associated with beaver-dependent wetlands, while offering a glimpse of what could be gained from their ongoing population recovery.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10980-026-02303-4.

海狸对湿地景观的改造:多尺度生物多样性和功能指标的响应
背景:景观尺度的恢复是逆转生物多样性下降的必要条件,但通过增强异质性来维持生物多样性的生态过程往往被忽视。大型食草动物是异质性的重要驱动因素,越来越多地用于恢复失去的动态过程。目的:随着海狸数量从历史低点恢复,我们在多个尺度上测试它们的生态系统工程潜力对生物多样性和生态系统功能的意义。方法:通过对芬兰埃沃9个海狸改造湿地和9个未改造湿地(对照湿地)的原位调查(植物和水甲虫)和eDNA取样(无脊椎动物和脊椎动物),在样品、场地和景观尺度上对10个分类类群进行量化。结果:不同湿地类型在样地尺度和样地尺度上的分类群平均值和总数基本相似,但在样地尺度(真蝇)和样地尺度(植物和真蝇)上,海狸湿地的分类群平均值和总数显著高于海狸湿地。63%的类群由海狸创造的湿地和对照湿地共享。然而,这两种湿地类型都支持独特的分类群,其中海狸湿地平均增加了19%(范围0-40%)的景观分类群库,最显著的是植物、甲虫、真蝇和may/stone/ caddis蝇。河狸湿地的植物功能多样性比对照湿地高55%。结论:海狸湿地是恢复动态生态过程的重要组成部分,为多个分类类群提供了避难所,支持了景观中缺失的分类群。我们的研究结果暗示了过去与海狸依赖湿地相关的生物多样性丧失的规模,同时也提供了从它们正在进行的种群恢复中可以获得的一瞥。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s10980-026-02303-4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landscape Ecology
Landscape Ecology 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Landscape Ecology is the flagship journal of a well-established and rapidly developing interdisciplinary science that focuses explicitly on the ecological understanding of spatial heterogeneity. Landscape Ecology draws together expertise from both biophysical and socioeconomic sciences to explore basic and applied research questions concerning the ecology, conservation, management, design/planning, and sustainability of landscapes as coupled human-environment systems. Landscape ecology studies are characterized by spatially explicit methods in which spatial attributes and arrangements of landscape elements are directly analyzed and related to ecological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书