The Effectiveness of the Benson Relaxation Technique on Anxiety and Hemodynamic Parameters in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
{"title":"The Effectiveness of the Benson Relaxation Technique on Anxiety and Hemodynamic Parameters in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Selma Turan Kavradim, Şefika Tuğba Yangöz, Zeynep Özer","doi":"10.1177/10547738261442767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To reveal the effectiveness of the Benson's relaxation technique on the anxiety and hemodynamic parameters of patients with cardiovascular disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Eight electronic databases were searched. The Cochrane Handbook 2023 and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis 2020 guideline were used to perform the study. A random effects model was used to calculate the combined effects of the interventions, and the robustness of the pooled estimates was assessed through sensitivity analyses. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool version 2. The Grading of Recommendations, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis included 8 trials with 538 patients. The Benson's relaxation technique had moderate-quality evidence for anxiety (Hedge's <i>g</i> = -0.662, <i>p</i> < .001) and saturation (Hedge's <i>g</i> = 0.657, <i>p</i> = .001), low-quality evidence for heart rate (Hedge's <i>g</i> = -0.507, <i>p</i> = .006), and diastolic blood pressure (Hedge's <i>g</i> = -0.280, <i>p</i> = .036) and very-low-quality evidence for systolic blood pressure (Hedge's <i>g</i> = -0.687, <i>p</i> = .002). No significant effect was observed on respiratory rate (Hedge's <i>g</i> = -0.578, <i>p</i> = .051) with very low-quality evidence. Sensitivity analyses showed variable robustness. An additional subgroup analysis of the Benson's relaxation intervention's effect on anxiety in surgical and nonsurgical patient groups revealed that this intervention significantly reduced anxiety in nonsurgical patient groups (Hedge's <i>g</i> = -0.603, <i>p</i> < .001) and systolic blood pressure (Hedge's <i>g</i> = -0.822, <i>p</i> < .001), but it was not effective in the surgical patient population (<i>p</i> = .072 and <i>p</i> = .097, respectively). This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that, although the certainty of the evidence varies, Benson's relaxation techniques may offer potential benefits for certain outcomes. The current evidence supports cautious clinical interpretation and emphasizes the need for high-quality randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"332-348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738261442767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To reveal the effectiveness of the Benson's relaxation technique on the anxiety and hemodynamic parameters of patients with cardiovascular disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Eight electronic databases were searched. The Cochrane Handbook 2023 and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis 2020 guideline were used to perform the study. A random effects model was used to calculate the combined effects of the interventions, and the robustness of the pooled estimates was assessed through sensitivity analyses. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool version 2. The Grading of Recommendations, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis included 8 trials with 538 patients. The Benson's relaxation technique had moderate-quality evidence for anxiety (Hedge's g = -0.662, p < .001) and saturation (Hedge's g = 0.657, p = .001), low-quality evidence for heart rate (Hedge's g = -0.507, p = .006), and diastolic blood pressure (Hedge's g = -0.280, p = .036) and very-low-quality evidence for systolic blood pressure (Hedge's g = -0.687, p = .002). No significant effect was observed on respiratory rate (Hedge's g = -0.578, p = .051) with very low-quality evidence. Sensitivity analyses showed variable robustness. An additional subgroup analysis of the Benson's relaxation intervention's effect on anxiety in surgical and nonsurgical patient groups revealed that this intervention significantly reduced anxiety in nonsurgical patient groups (Hedge's g = -0.603, p < .001) and systolic blood pressure (Hedge's g = -0.822, p < .001), but it was not effective in the surgical patient population (p = .072 and p = .097, respectively). This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that, although the certainty of the evidence varies, Benson's relaxation techniques may offer potential benefits for certain outcomes. The current evidence supports cautious clinical interpretation and emphasizes the need for high-quality randomized controlled trials.
目的探讨本森放松法对心血管疾病患者焦虑及血流动力学参数的影响。随机对照研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。检索了8个电子数据库。采用Cochrane手册2023和首选的系统评价报告项目和元分析指南2020进行研究。采用随机效应模型计算干预措施的综合效应,并通过敏感性分析评估合并估计的稳健性。采用Cochrane风险偏倚工具第2版对纳入研究的方法学质量进行评估。采用推荐、发展和评价分级法评价证据的确定性。该系统综述和荟萃分析包括8项试验,538例患者。Benson's放松技术对焦虑有中等质量的证据(Hedge's g = -0.662, p g = 0.657, p =。0.001),低质量的心率证据(赫奇g = -0.507, p =。006),舒张压(Hedge’s g = -0.280, p =。036)和非常低质量的收缩压证据(Hedge’s g = -0.687, p = 0.002)。对呼吸频率无显著影响(Hedge’s g = -0.578, p =。051)证据质量很低。敏感性分析显示了可变稳健性。另一项针对本森放松干预对手术组和非手术组患者焦虑影响的亚组分析显示,该干预显著降低了非手术组患者的焦虑(Hedge's g = -0.603, p g = -0.822, p p =)。072和p =。097年,分别)。这一系统回顾和荟萃分析表明,尽管证据的确定性有所不同,但本森的放松技术可能为某些结果提供潜在的好处。目前的证据支持谨慎的临床解释,并强调需要进行高质量的随机对照试验。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).