Shahar Agami, Lili Sror, Shelly Levy-Tzedek, Iuly Treger, Michal Vered, Mindy F Levin, Sigal Berman
{"title":"Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.","authors":"Shahar Agami, Lili Sror, Shelly Levy-Tzedek, Iuly Treger, Michal Vered, Mindy F Levin, Sigal Berman","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2026.2674002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke is a leading cause of long-term sensorimotor disability, with upper limb deficits often persisting into the chronic stage. For many patients with stroke, the active muscle control zone, i.e., the angular range of typical muscle activation patterns, is reduced, leading to abnormal patterns and spasticity. When the displayed angle in a virtual environment is smaller than the actual angle, participants may implicitly perceive that their arm remains within the control zone. This discrepancy between visual and proprioceptive information may promote visuo-proprioceptive recalibration and sensorimotor adaptation. The current study included two preliminary investigations, one with healthy participants and one with participants with stroke, each divided into two groups (<i>offset</i>, <i>control</i>). Twenty-one healthy participants underwent a 30-min training session, after which they were tested with the actual elbow angle. Twelve hospitalized individuals with sub-acute stroke underwent three 30-min training sessions over one week. In both studies motion duration of participants who trained with an offset differed from motion of controls who trained with actual feedback. However, Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper limb scores in participants with stroke increased similarly for both groups. Additional testing is required to examine whether the method may be a potential direction for individualized impairment-based intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"492-502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2026.2674002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of long-term sensorimotor disability, with upper limb deficits often persisting into the chronic stage. For many patients with stroke, the active muscle control zone, i.e., the angular range of typical muscle activation patterns, is reduced, leading to abnormal patterns and spasticity. When the displayed angle in a virtual environment is smaller than the actual angle, participants may implicitly perceive that their arm remains within the control zone. This discrepancy between visual and proprioceptive information may promote visuo-proprioceptive recalibration and sensorimotor adaptation. The current study included two preliminary investigations, one with healthy participants and one with participants with stroke, each divided into two groups (offset, control). Twenty-one healthy participants underwent a 30-min training session, after which they were tested with the actual elbow angle. Twelve hospitalized individuals with sub-acute stroke underwent three 30-min training sessions over one week. In both studies motion duration of participants who trained with an offset differed from motion of controls who trained with actual feedback. However, Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper limb scores in participants with stroke increased similarly for both groups. Additional testing is required to examine whether the method may be a potential direction for individualized impairment-based intervention.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.