Conceptions of national identity and interreligious contact avoidance in differing domains: A multigroup analysis of majority and minority religious groups in India

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Kumar Yogeeswaran, Jessica Gale, Maykel Verkuyten
{"title":"Conceptions of national identity and interreligious contact avoidance in differing domains: A multigroup analysis of majority and minority religious groups in India","authors":"Kumar Yogeeswaran,&nbsp;Jessica Gale,&nbsp;Maykel Verkuyten","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current research examined how inclusive versus exclusive conceptions of national identity were associated with interreligious contact avoidance across relatively public (neighbours) versus private (marriage) domains among majority and minority religious groups. Using data from a large national sample (<i>N ~</i> 30,000) of Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Sikhs and Buddhists in the rarely studied context of India, we found that an inclusive and tolerant conception of Indian national identity was strongly endorsed among all groups, while an exclusive Hindu national identity was more strongly endorsed by the Hindu majority than religious minorities. Interreligious contact avoidance was consistently higher among all groups in the context of marriage than neighbours. Multigroup path analysis revealed that an inclusive national identity was associated with less interreligious avoidance as neighbours among majority and minority groups (except Buddhists), but it was unrelated to interreligious avoidance in the domain of marriage among all (except Sikhs). By contrast, an exclusive national identity was associated with more contact avoidance both as neighbours and through marriage among majority and minority religious groups (except Muslims). Collectively, these findings reveal that inclusive versus exclusive conceptions of national identity can be differentially associated with distinct forms of contact avoidance among majority and minority groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"65 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.70100","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.70100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current research examined how inclusive versus exclusive conceptions of national identity were associated with interreligious contact avoidance across relatively public (neighbours) versus private (marriage) domains among majority and minority religious groups. Using data from a large national sample (N ~ 30,000) of Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Sikhs and Buddhists in the rarely studied context of India, we found that an inclusive and tolerant conception of Indian national identity was strongly endorsed among all groups, while an exclusive Hindu national identity was more strongly endorsed by the Hindu majority than religious minorities. Interreligious contact avoidance was consistently higher among all groups in the context of marriage than neighbours. Multigroup path analysis revealed that an inclusive national identity was associated with less interreligious avoidance as neighbours among majority and minority groups (except Buddhists), but it was unrelated to interreligious avoidance in the domain of marriage among all (except Sikhs). By contrast, an exclusive national identity was associated with more contact avoidance both as neighbours and through marriage among majority and minority religious groups (except Muslims). Collectively, these findings reveal that inclusive versus exclusive conceptions of national identity can be differentially associated with distinct forms of contact avoidance among majority and minority groups.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

民族认同的概念和不同领域的宗教间接触避免:印度多数和少数宗教群体的多群体分析。
目前的研究考察了民族认同的包容性与排他性概念如何与多数和少数宗教群体相对公开(邻居)和私人(婚姻)领域的宗教间接触避免相关。在印度很少被研究的背景下,我们使用来自印度教徒、穆斯林、基督教徒、锡克教徒和佛教徒的大型国家样本(N ~ 30,000)的数据发现,包容和宽容的印度民族认同概念在所有群体中都得到了强烈支持,而排外的印度教民族认同则得到了印度教多数群体比宗教少数群体更强烈的支持。在婚姻背景下,所有群体的宗教间接触回避率始终高于邻居。多群体路径分析显示,在多数群体和少数群体(佛教徒除外)之间,包容性的民族认同与较少的宗教间回避有关,但在所有群体(锡克教徒除外)之间的婚姻领域,它与宗教间回避无关。相比之下,排他性的国家身份与更多的接触避免有关,无论是作为邻居还是通过多数和少数宗教团体(穆斯林除外)的婚姻。总的来说,这些发现表明,在多数群体和少数群体中,包容性和排他性的国家认同概念可能与不同形式的接触回避有不同的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Social Psychology publishes work from scholars based in all parts of the world, and manuscripts that present data on a wide range of populations inside and outside the UK. It publishes original papers in all areas of social psychology including: • social cognition • attitudes • group processes • social influence • intergroup relations • self and identity • nonverbal communication • social psychological aspects of personality, affect and emotion • language and discourse Submissions addressing these topics from a variety of approaches and methods, both quantitative and qualitative are welcomed. We publish papers of the following kinds: • empirical papers that address theoretical issues; • theoretical papers, including analyses of existing social psychological theories and presentations of theoretical innovations, extensions, or integrations; • review papers that provide an evaluation of work within a given area of social psychology and that present proposals for further research in that area; • methodological papers concerning issues that are particularly relevant to a wide range of social psychologists; • an invited agenda article as the first article in the first part of every volume. The editorial team aims to handle papers as efficiently as possible. In 2016, papers were triaged within less than a week, and the average turnaround time from receipt of the manuscript to first decision sent back to the authors was 47 days.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书