Prioritising time for communication in healthcare-a normative analysis.

IF 3.6 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s11019-026-10364-0
Joar Björk
{"title":"Prioritising time for communication in healthcare-a normative analysis.","authors":"Joar Björk","doi":"10.1007/s11019-026-10364-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modern healthcare faces a mismatch in terms of supply and demand which makes careful priority setting imperative. The debate on priority setting in healthcare has focussed on pharmaceuticals and other tangible medical interventions. This article instead looks at the time that healthcare professionals have at their disposal. How should healthcare professionals divide their time between tangible medical interventions and communication with patients? What communicative goals should be prioritised? This normative analysis focusses on situations which involve time consuming communication between professionals and patients, which cannot easily be carried out alongside other medical interventions or is itself the main intervention as in psychotherapy. The arguments brought forth are applicable across the healthcare panorama and apply to all healthcare professions. It is argued that there are many different communicative goals which cannot be reduced to one type. Some recommendations are given and defended regarding the priority setting of different communicative goals. For reasons of value coherence and formal equality, all patients should be given a baseline amount of time for communication and time beyond that should be prioritised based on healthcare needs. If accepted, the arguments here highlight that a substantive part of healthcare's (time) resources should be spent on communicative tasks. Indeed, it is time that we take time for communication seriously.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":"805-813"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13633962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-026-10364-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern healthcare faces a mismatch in terms of supply and demand which makes careful priority setting imperative. The debate on priority setting in healthcare has focussed on pharmaceuticals and other tangible medical interventions. This article instead looks at the time that healthcare professionals have at their disposal. How should healthcare professionals divide their time between tangible medical interventions and communication with patients? What communicative goals should be prioritised? This normative analysis focusses on situations which involve time consuming communication between professionals and patients, which cannot easily be carried out alongside other medical interventions or is itself the main intervention as in psychotherapy. The arguments brought forth are applicable across the healthcare panorama and apply to all healthcare professions. It is argued that there are many different communicative goals which cannot be reduced to one type. Some recommendations are given and defended regarding the priority setting of different communicative goals. For reasons of value coherence and formal equality, all patients should be given a baseline amount of time for communication and time beyond that should be prioritised based on healthcare needs. If accepted, the arguments here highlight that a substantive part of healthcare's (time) resources should be spent on communicative tasks. Indeed, it is time that we take time for communication seriously.

优先考虑医疗保健中的沟通时间-规范分析。
现代医疗保健面临着供需不匹配的问题,因此必须谨慎地确定优先事项。关于卫生保健领域确定优先事项的辩论侧重于药品和其他有形医疗干预措施。本文关注的是医疗保健专业人员可以支配的时间。医疗保健专业人员应该如何在有形的医疗干预和与患者沟通之间分配时间?哪些交际目标应该优先考虑?这种规范性分析侧重于涉及专业人员和患者之间耗时的沟通的情况,这种情况不容易与其他医疗干预措施一起进行,或者本身就是心理治疗中的主要干预措施。提出的论点适用于整个医疗保健全景,并适用于所有医疗保健专业。本文认为交际目的有很多,不能归结为一种类型。针对不同交际目标的优先级设置提出了一些建议,并进行了辩护。出于价值一致性和形式上平等的原因,应给所有患者一个基本的沟通时间,超过这个时间应根据医疗保健需求优先考虑。如果被接受,这里的论点强调了医疗保健(时间)资源的实质性部分应该花在沟通任务上。的确,现在是我们认真对待交流时间的时候了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy: A European Journal is the official journal of the European Society for Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care. It provides a forum for international exchange of research data, theories, reports and opinions in bioethics and philosophy of medicine. The journal promotes interdisciplinary studies, and stimulates philosophical analysis centered on a common object of reflection: health care, the human effort to deal with disease, illness, death as well as health, well-being and life. Particular attention is paid to developing contributions from all European countries, and to making accessible scientific work and reports on the practice of health care ethics, from all nations, cultures and language areas in Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书