When Safety Promotion Impairs Access to Care: Lessons From Endoscopy Across Canada.

Q2 Medicine
Simon Houston, Amanda Porter
{"title":"When Safety Promotion Impairs Access to Care: Lessons From Endoscopy Across Canada.","authors":"Simon Houston, Amanda Porter","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2026.27836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An informal review of existing conscious sedation policies across Canada shows that, following endoscopic procedures, many sites require that a patient be accompanied home and cared for by a support person. Though well-intended, these policies may act as a barrier to care for vulnerable persons or result in unnecessary hospital admissions. We argue that equity requires more flexibility, creativity and risk tolerance in the application or interpretation of safety-related rules in particular situations. Unexamined common practices can sometimes pull against our responsibility to promote greater equity and access to care. Revisiting these policies and practices could reduce inequities in healthcare accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"21 3","pages":"47-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13227526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2026.27836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An informal review of existing conscious sedation policies across Canada shows that, following endoscopic procedures, many sites require that a patient be accompanied home and cared for by a support person. Though well-intended, these policies may act as a barrier to care for vulnerable persons or result in unnecessary hospital admissions. We argue that equity requires more flexibility, creativity and risk tolerance in the application or interpretation of safety-related rules in particular situations. Unexamined common practices can sometimes pull against our responsibility to promote greater equity and access to care. Revisiting these policies and practices could reduce inequities in healthcare accessibility.

当安全宣传妨碍获得护理:来自加拿大各地内窥镜检查的经验教训。
对加拿大各地现有的有意识镇静政策的非正式审查表明,在内窥镜手术后,许多地方要求患者陪同回家并由支持人员照顾。虽然用意良好,但这些政策可能成为照顾弱势群体的障碍,或导致不必要的住院。我们认为,在特定情况下,公平要求在应用或解释安全相关规则时具有更大的灵活性、创造性和风险容忍度。未经审查的常见做法有时会阻碍我们促进更大公平和获得医疗服务的责任。重新审视这些政策和做法可以减少卫生保健可及性方面的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书