Must egalitarians oppose private healthcare?

IF 3.6 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s11019-026-10365-z
Johann Go
{"title":"Must egalitarians oppose private healthcare?","authors":"Johann Go","doi":"10.1007/s11019-026-10365-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A central tenet of health equity is that access to healthcare should be responsive to need rather than patients' socioeconomic status. The idea that ability to pay can enable some people to access faster, better, or more healthcare strikes many egalitarians as clearly objectionable. This paper argues that this view is more complicated than may initially appear. While there are egalitarian reasons to oppose private healthcare, these are often less decisive than they may initially appear and prohibiting private healthcare on egalitarian grounds is likely to run afoul of egalitarianism's liberal commitments. There are several important theoretical hurdles to pass through for a successful egalitarian argument against private healthcare, which this paper aims to highlight.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":"815-823"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13633964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-026-10365-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A central tenet of health equity is that access to healthcare should be responsive to need rather than patients' socioeconomic status. The idea that ability to pay can enable some people to access faster, better, or more healthcare strikes many egalitarians as clearly objectionable. This paper argues that this view is more complicated than may initially appear. While there are egalitarian reasons to oppose private healthcare, these are often less decisive than they may initially appear and prohibiting private healthcare on egalitarian grounds is likely to run afoul of egalitarianism's liberal commitments. There are several important theoretical hurdles to pass through for a successful egalitarian argument against private healthcare, which this paper aims to highlight.

平等主义者一定要反对私人医疗吗?
卫生公平的一个核心原则是,获得卫生保健应根据需要而不是根据患者的社会经济地位。支付能力可以让一些人获得更快、更好或更多的医疗服务,这种想法显然会遭到许多平等主义者的反对。本文认为,这种观点比最初看起来要复杂得多。虽然有平等主义的理由反对私人医疗保健,但这些理由往往不像最初看起来那样具有决定性,而且基于平等主义的理由禁止私人医疗保健可能与平等主义的自由承诺相冲突。有几个重要的理论障碍,通过一个成功的平等主义论点反对私人医疗保健,这篇论文的目的是强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy: A European Journal is the official journal of the European Society for Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care. It provides a forum for international exchange of research data, theories, reports and opinions in bioethics and philosophy of medicine. The journal promotes interdisciplinary studies, and stimulates philosophical analysis centered on a common object of reflection: health care, the human effort to deal with disease, illness, death as well as health, well-being and life. Particular attention is paid to developing contributions from all European countries, and to making accessible scientific work and reports on the practice of health care ethics, from all nations, cultures and language areas in Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书