Commentary: Gender Equity Is Essential for Optimal Surgical Prioritization: A Response to Quinn and Brennand.

Q2 Medicine
Alana M Flexman, Gianni R Lorello
{"title":"Commentary: Gender Equity Is Essential for Optimal Surgical Prioritization: A Response to Quinn and Brennand.","authors":"Alana M Flexman, Gianni R Lorello","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2026.27833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gender equity in surgical care remains an outstanding issue requiring coordinated, system-wide solutions. Persistent inequities are amplified by embedded systemic and structural biases, including full recognition of gynecology as equal surgical service, lower renumeration for gynecological procedures compared with equivalent urological procedures, the gender pay gap and the chronic deprioritization of gynecological conditions. The legacy of these historic inequities urgently needs to be addressed in contemporary practice, with enhanced accountability and transparency on surgical wait times, scheduling priorities and remuneration. Only with such reforms can we move toward full equity for patients and providers of gynecological care.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"21 3","pages":"70-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13227522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2026.27833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gender equity in surgical care remains an outstanding issue requiring coordinated, system-wide solutions. Persistent inequities are amplified by embedded systemic and structural biases, including full recognition of gynecology as equal surgical service, lower renumeration for gynecological procedures compared with equivalent urological procedures, the gender pay gap and the chronic deprioritization of gynecological conditions. The legacy of these historic inequities urgently needs to be addressed in contemporary practice, with enhanced accountability and transparency on surgical wait times, scheduling priorities and remuneration. Only with such reforms can we move toward full equity for patients and providers of gynecological care.

评论:性别平等对最佳手术优先级至关重要:对Quinn和Brennand的回应。
外科护理中的性别平等仍然是一个突出的问题,需要协调,全系统的解决方案。根深蒂固的系统性和结构性偏见加剧了持续的不平等,包括完全承认妇科是同等的外科服务,妇科手术的报酬低于同等的泌尿外科手术,性别工资差距以及妇科疾病长期被剥夺优先权。这些历史上不公平的遗留问题迫切需要在当代实践中得到解决,加强对手术等待时间、调度优先事项和薪酬的问责制和透明度。只有进行这样的改革,我们才能实现妇科护理对患者和提供者的完全平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书