[Chronic epidural electrical stimulation of lumbar enlargement for pain relief after ineffective neurolysis in patients with post-traumatic sciatic neuropathy].

Q4 Medicine
V P Kondratyev, A V Dekopov, E D Isagulyan, A A Tomskiy
{"title":"[Chronic epidural electrical stimulation of lumbar enlargement for pain relief after ineffective neurolysis in patients with post-traumatic sciatic neuropathy].","authors":"V P Kondratyev, A V Dekopov, E D Isagulyan, A A Tomskiy","doi":"10.17116/neiro20269003167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral nerveinjuries affect approximately 200.000 patients annually in Russia, and sciatic nerve injuries constitute about 8.3% (~16.600 cases). Many patients develop chronic neuropathic pain refractory to standard therapy. Surgical neurolysis provides adequate relief in only 50-80% of cases, and effective alternatives are needed for other patients. Chronic spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a promising modality for these patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate efficacy and safety of chronic SCS for chronic pain due to post-traumatic sciatic neuropathy refractory to conservative therapy and neurolysis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center study included 10 patients with persistent neuropathic pain despite prior pharmacotherapy and neurolysis. All patients underwent SCS with pain assessment. The primary efficacy criterion was reduction of VAS score ≥50% after test stimulation period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive responses were achieved in 9 out of 10 patients (90%). Mean VAS scores significantly decreased from 7.9±1.3 to 3.3±1.5 (<i>p</i>=0.007). Therapeutic effect was maintained in all responders throughout the follow-up period (3 months-2 years) without complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chronic SCS is a highly effective and safe treatment for chronic pain in patients with post-traumatic sciatic neuropathy resistant to standard therapies. These results justify SCS in such clinical scenarios and highlight the need for further prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":24032,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","volume":"90 3","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20269003167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral nerveinjuries affect approximately 200.000 patients annually in Russia, and sciatic nerve injuries constitute about 8.3% (~16.600 cases). Many patients develop chronic neuropathic pain refractory to standard therapy. Surgical neurolysis provides adequate relief in only 50-80% of cases, and effective alternatives are needed for other patients. Chronic spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a promising modality for these patients.

Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of chronic SCS for chronic pain due to post-traumatic sciatic neuropathy refractory to conservative therapy and neurolysis.

Material and methods: A retrospective single-center study included 10 patients with persistent neuropathic pain despite prior pharmacotherapy and neurolysis. All patients underwent SCS with pain assessment. The primary efficacy criterion was reduction of VAS score ≥50% after test stimulation period.

Results: Positive responses were achieved in 9 out of 10 patients (90%). Mean VAS scores significantly decreased from 7.9±1.3 to 3.3±1.5 (p=0.007). Therapeutic effect was maintained in all responders throughout the follow-up period (3 months-2 years) without complications.

Conclusion: Chronic SCS is a highly effective and safe treatment for chronic pain in patients with post-traumatic sciatic neuropathy resistant to standard therapies. These results justify SCS in such clinical scenarios and highlight the need for further prospective studies.

[慢性硬膜外电刺激腰大术治疗创伤后坐骨神经病变无效松解后疼痛缓解]。
简介:俄罗斯每年约有20万例周围神经损伤患者,其中坐骨神经损伤约占8.3%(约16600例)。许多患者发展为慢性神经性疼痛,标准治疗难治性疼痛。手术神经松解术仅在50-80%的病例中提供足够的缓解,其他患者需要有效的替代方案。慢性脊髓刺激(SCS)是一种很有前途的治疗方法。目的:评价慢性SCS治疗难以保守治疗和神经松解术的创伤后坐骨神经病变引起的慢性疼痛的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:一项回顾性的单中心研究纳入了10例既往有药物治疗和神经松解术的持续性神经性疼痛患者。所有患者均行SCS并进行疼痛评估。主要疗效标准为试验刺激期后VAS评分降低≥50%。结果:10例患者中有9例(90%)获得阳性反应。VAS平均评分由7.9±1.3分降至3.3±1.5分(p=0.007)。在整个随访期间(3个月-2年),所有应答者均保持治疗效果,无并发症。结论:慢性SCS是治疗标准治疗无效的创伤后坐骨神经病变患者慢性疼痛的一种高效、安全的治疗方法。这些结果证明了SCS在这种临床情况下的合理性,并强调了进一步前瞻性研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal. This publication covers the theoretical, practical and organizational problems of modern neurosurgery, the latest advances in the treatment of various diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system. Founded in 1937. English version of the journal translates from Russian version since #1/2013.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书